Re: AS 54271

2008-07-13 Thread Christian Koch
finding the >> one-sided mistake hard to believe. Either that or the folks at AS20922 >> haven't figured out that an open bgp peer isn't a great idea! :) >> >> Scott >> -Original Message----- >> From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sund

Re: AS 54271

2008-07-13 Thread Joel Jaeggli
x27;t figured out that an open bgp peer isn't a great idea! :) Scott -Original Message- From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 1:36 PM To: Marshall Eubanks Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: AS 54271 those prefixes all have ripe route object with origin

RE: AS 54271

2008-07-13 Thread Scott Morris
e. Either that or the folks at AS20922 haven't figured out that an open bgp peer isn't a great idea! :) Scott -Original Message- From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 1:36 PM To: Marshall Eubanks Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: AS 54271 tho

Re: AS 54271

2008-07-13 Thread manolo
This ip space is from Bahrain 89.148.0.0/19 but some how has ended up in Hungary from an unknown owner. Definitely looks suspicious in my book. Manolo Joel Jaeggli wrote: those prefixes all have ripe route object with origin AS 20922 all the routes I see for a given prefix look like the f

Re: AS 54271

2008-07-13 Thread Joel Jaeggli
those prefixes all have ripe route object with origin AS 20922 all the routes I see for a given prefix look like the following: 2914 1299 12301 8696 20922 54271 129.250.0.171 from 129.250.0.171 (129.250.0.12) Origin IGP, metric 1, localpref 100, valid, external Community: 2914:

Re: AS 54271

2008-07-13 Thread Jon Kibler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marshall Eubanks wrote: > As of this morning, I am seeing BGP from AS 54271 > > *> 62.77.196.0/22 38.101.161.1166991 0 174 3549 > 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i I would be willing to bet that the IP netblocks being advertise

Re: AS 54271

2008-07-13 Thread Fredy Kuenzler
Patrick W. Gilmore schrieb: On Jul 13, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: As of this morning, I am seeing BGP from AS 54271 Maybe someone mistyped "65271"? Which is still bad, but not at bad (IMHO). Interestingly, AS54271 is the last # of an unassigned block: 46080-47103Assigne

Re: AS 54271

2008-07-13 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Jul 13, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: As of this morning, I am seeing BGP from AS 54271 Maybe someone mistyped "65271"? Which is still bad, but not at bad (IMHO). -- TTFN, patrick *> 62.77.196.0/22 38.101.161.1166991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 869