Probably a TTL problem. Did you configure ebgp-multihop?
Eric Dugas
ZEROFAIL / AS40191
edu...@zerofail.com
-Original Message-
From: Philip Lavine [mailto:source_ro...@yahoo.com]
Sent: December 18, 2013 10:48 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: BGP from Juniper to Cisco ASR
Dec 18 07:46:33:
I was able to solve the issue by statically routing the connected /29 out the
connected interface, that way it overrode the BGP learned route for the same
subnet (unfortunately this might have been a multi-homing issue that resulted
in asymmetrical routing to the primary peer via the secondary
yes I tried multihop
even though my peer is on the same /29
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 8:10 AM, Eric Dugas edu...@zerofail.com wrote:
Probably a TTL problem. Did you configure ebgp-multihop?
Eric Dugas
ZEROFAIL / AS40191
edu...@zerofail.com
-Original Message-
From: Philip
On 18 December 2013 15:48, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dec 18 07:46:33: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor REMOTE PEER
active 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
Dec 18 15:46:33.615: BGP: ses global REMOTE PEER (0x7FB1CD209CF0:0) act
Receive NOTIFICATION 2/5
When I had that problem, it was because the max-prefixes on the Juniper router
was being triggered. If I remember correctly. It's a strange return message
for the wrong issue.
From: Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
5 matches
Mail list logo
