On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
I just thought this is amusing that in CSI: New York – Season 7,
Episode 17, they do a 'Remote Desktop' hack and they enter in the
following details…
http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg
Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Dodgy Address =
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
Is 127.0.0.1 / ::1 the Internet version of 555?
Not according to the RFC:s.
Given the use of 555 in the (North American) TV world, and the
regularity with which IETF defines specific example resources of
various sorts,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 06:35:35PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 20, 2011, at 6:29 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:44:50 +1100, Skeeve Stevens said:
On 21/03/2011 06:04, Martin Millnert wrote:
I assume it has been discussed and rejected. Can anyone enlighten us on why?
RFC 3849?
Nick
Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
But I'm surprised 1918 space was used as well.
172.12.0.0 is not RFC 1918 but it is unallocated.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at http://dotat.at/
Viking: Southwesterly 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8 in northwest Viking, veering
westerly 5 or
I would have used 192.0.2.0/24. It is the IPv4 version of
example.com.
--
Ina
Or even anything in 127.55.0.0 should be safe.
On Mar 20, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
one would almost expect there'd be 555-equivalent
address spaces defined by the IETF already.
In IPv6, I would expect the documentation example (2001:db8::/32) would suffice
for the purpose.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:44:50 +1100, Skeeve Stevens said:
http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg
Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Dodgy Address = Fail!
Intentional Fail, probably, similar to how most phone numbers on a TV show are
in the 555 exchange. You put a number on TV, and drunk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 20, 2011, at 6:29 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:44:50 +1100, Skeeve Stevens said:
http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg
Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Especially since 148.18 is Department of Defence - but it doesn't seem to be
routed at the moment.
...Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414
On 3/20/2011 11:44 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
All,
I just thought this is amusing that in CSI: New York – Season 7, Episode 17,
they do a 'Remote Desktop' hack and they enter in the following details…
http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg
Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Dodgy Address
- Original Message -
From: Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net
Is 127.0.0.1 / ::1 the Internet version of 555? Or will I hurt
myself, so now I'm going to sue you mean we can't even use that?
I'm a touch surprised that *you're* asking that question, Patrick. I
figured your chapeau
-Original Message-
From: Paul Graydon [mailto:p...@paulgraydon.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 9:02 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: CSI New York fake IPv6
But seriously. That a major TV show is actually using IPv6 addressing
(or pretending to) is an awesome thing in my
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Fouant sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net
Makes a good change from a 5 octet IP number I remember them using
in one episode revolving around an adult webcam website.
I remember seeing that show. I think they had Jim Fleming on as a
consultant. ;
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
No, there are several reserved stretches of both IPv4 and DNS space
for just such reasons. example.com is the most common and well known,
but see also RFC 3330 and RFC 5737, not necessarily in that order.
See also this
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Is 127.0.0.1 / ::1 the Internet version of 555? Or will I hurt myself, so now
I'm going to sue you mean we can't even use that?
It'd be nice if TV producers even knew that not all of 555 was to be
used for television shows*, let alone that there's an internet
On 3/20/2011 4:44 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Dodgy Address = Fail!
But seriously… That a major TV show is actually using IPv6 addressing (or
pretending to) is an awesome thing in my opinion.
More curious, for me, is their choice of a hardware vendor: Alacron,
Inc. (
17 matches
Mail list logo
