Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread rcheung
David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease remote connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the Datalink (private VPN) service, which separates your aircard traffic from other customers within a VRF, obviating the need to run a separate VPN client. -RC

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread rcheung
David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease remote connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the Datalink (private VPN) service, which separates your aircard traffic from other customers within a VRF, obviating the need to run a separate VPN client. -RC

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
A very flexible solution can be done with the Mikrotik family of routerssee this as an example for more details.. http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/BR09/3G_Applications.pdf Faisal On Nov 15, 2011, at 6:34 AM, rche...@rochester.rr.com wrote: David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a

RE: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread Ryan Finnesey
, November 15, 2011 6:41 AM To: nanog@nanog.org; David Hubbard Subject: Re: Cell-based OOB management devices David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease remote connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the Datalink (private VPN) service, which separates your aircard

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread PC
, 2011 6:41 AM To: nanog@nanog.org; David Hubbard Subject: Re: Cell-based OOB management devices David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease remote connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the Datalink (private VPN) service, which separates your aircard

RE: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread Ryan Finnesey
We pay $4 per SIM with att then about $2.50 per MB. Cheers Ryan From: PC [mailto:paul4...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:15 PM To: Ryan Finnesey Cc: rche...@rochester.rr.com; nanog@nanog.org; David Hubbard Subject: Re: Cell-based OOB management devices Second

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-07 Thread Cameron Byrne
On Nov 6, 2011 10:15 PM, David Hubbard dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote: Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for out of band management during emergencies. I was wondering if anyone had experiences with such devices

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-07 Thread Joe Hamelin
On Nov 6, 2011 10:15 PM, David Hubbard dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote: Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for out of band management during emergencies. I've used the Digi devices for Clearwire site OOB

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-07 Thread Edward Salonia
I would look into Uplogix. I've seen them demo their products at Cisco Live a couple of times and they seem very good. - You can connect a cellular modem to them. - They can store backup device configs. - They can store IOS images. - They can even xmodem an image to a device if it gets stuck in

RE: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-07 Thread ebarrios

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-06 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 11/6/11 10:14 PM, David Hubbard wrote: Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for out of band management during emergencies. I was wondering if anyone had experiences with such devices they could share? Devices I've

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-06 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Nov 7, 2011, at 1:14 PM, David Hubbard wrote: Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for out of band management during emergencies. Some of the lower-end Cisco routers have '3G' interfaces available as an option, I