RE: Dns sometimes fails using Google DNS / automatic dnssec

2012-11-19 Thread MailPlus| David Hofstee
fixed... --- David Hofstee -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Yunhong Gu [mailto:g...@google.com] Verzonden: donderdag 15 november 2012 18:29 Aan: Jay Ford CC: MailPlus| David Hofstee; nanog@nanog.org Onderwerp: Re: Dns sometimes fails using Google DNS / automatic dnssec

Re: Dns sometimes fails using Google DNS / automatic dnssec

2012-11-15 Thread Yunhong Gu
Hi, David I work at Google Public DNS and will take a look at this issue. No RRSIG should be returned unless the client set the DO bit to ask for it. Thanks Yunhong On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:12 AM, MailPlus| David Hofstee da...@mailplus.nl wrote: Hi, We've been seeing automatic RRSIG records

RE: Dns sometimes fails using Google DNS / automatic dnssec

2012-11-15 Thread MailPlus| David Hofstee
- Van: Yunhong Gu [mailto:g...@google.com] Verzonden: donderdag 15 november 2012 15:47 Aan: MailPlus| David Hofstee CC: nanog@nanog.org Onderwerp: Re: Dns sometimes fails using Google DNS / automatic dnssec Hi, David I work at Google Public DNS and will take a look at this issue. No RRSIG should

RE: Dns sometimes fails using Google DNS / automatic dnssec

2012-11-15 Thread Jay Ford
It looks like if the server has the RRSIG RR, it returns it. For example, a query with +dnssec will cause it to cache the RRSIG, after which it returns it even if +dnssec not specified. Jay Ford, Network Engineering Group,

Re: Dns sometimes fails using Google DNS / automatic dnssec

2012-11-15 Thread Yunhong Gu
Hi, we have found the bug that caused this problem. It was introduced in a very recent release. The fix is on its way. Thanks very much for the report, Yunhong On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Jay Ford jay-f...@uiowa.edu wrote: It looks like if the server has the RRSIG RR, it returns it. For

RE: Dns sometimes fails using Google DNS / automatic dnssec

2012-11-15 Thread Tony Finch
Jay Ford jay-f...@uiowa.edu wrote: It looks like if the server has the RRSIG RR, it returns it. For example, a query with +dnssec will cause it to cache the RRSIG, after which it returns it even if +dnssec not specified. It's weird. If you repeatedly query 8.8.4.4 without the DO bit, you get