O'Rourke [mailto:mkorou...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:43 PM
To: Joel Jaeggli
Cc: George Bonser; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc.
Is the idea behind the /48 being looked at (keeping in mind a mixed IPv4/IPv6
environment
http://www.ietf.org/rfc
-Original Message-
From: Scott Leibrand
It sounds like you're on the right track. You discovered the 2009-5
Multiple Discrete Networks draft policy, which should allow you a
separate /48 for each discrete network. That is somewhat orthogonal to
the question of whether you should
I can't in good conscience justify a /32. That is just too much space.
Then you need to go back to IPv6 101.
I believe I can, however, justify a separate /48 in Europe and APAC with
my various offices and data centers in that region coming from the /48
for that region.
A /48 is for a
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dillon [mailto:wavetos...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 4:11 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc.
I can't in good conscience justify a /32. That is just too much
space.
Then you need
]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:43 PM
To: Joel Jaeggli
Cc: George Bonser; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc.
Is the idea behind the /48 being looked at (keeping in mind a mixed IPv4/IPv6
environment http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5375.txt
http://www.ietf.org
The assumption that networks will filter /48s is not the whole story.
The RIRs giving out /48s do so from a single pool that only contains /
48 assignments.
The RIRs give out /32s from a pool containing /32 or shorter prefixes
(ie /31, /30, etc. etc).
You will find that most networks
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Ward [mailto:na...@daork.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:34 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc.
The assumption that networks will filter /48s is not the whole story.
...
You will find that most
On 23/12/2009, at 3:52 PM, George Bonser wrote:
If you can justify getting a /32, then I suggest you do so, but if
not
then don't worry, a /48 will work just fine. The networks that do
filter you will pretty soon adapt I expect.
I can't in good conscience justify a /32. That is just too
I'm not an expert, but can/should you advertise ARIN IP space on APNIC
or RIPE, etc ? You are talking about having recieved ip space from
ARIN, tied to an ARIN AS I suppose it's probably more a matter of
form than anything else though.
This happens all the time with IPv4 space and AS
On 23/12/2009, at 4:04 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
I'm not an expert, but can/should you advertise ARIN IP space on
APNIC
or RIPE, etc ? You are talking about having recieved ip space from
ARIN, tied to an ARIN AS I suppose it's probably more a matter of
form than anything else though.
George Bonser wrote:
We have decided to initiate the process of becoming IPv6 capable. We
have requested and received a block of addresses which, after reading
some of the discussion here, I fear may be too small to suit our needs
(a /48). To better understand how to proceed and in an
11 matches
Mail list logo
