On 2014-01-16, at 18:21, Jeroen Massar jer...@massar.ch wrote:
On 2014-01-16 23:11, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 16/01/2014 21:22, Jon Lewis wrote:
Also, at least of the ones I've dealt with, there is no verification of
records as they're entered.
on the RIPE IRRDB, there is validation, so you
]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:31 PM
To: Blake Hudson; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc
On 15/01/2014 21:22, Blake Hudson wrote:
I have emailed Level3 about the incorrect entries in their IRR with no
response. I have also emailed Cogent about their incorrect
On 16/01/2014 14:32, Blake Hudson wrote:
Thanks for the responses, these objects are all older. However, none of
them are stale or from previous owners, allocations, etc. Each of these
objects were posted to their respective IRR's after the IP space was
allocated to us. This leads me to
On 16/01/2014 14:32, Blake Hudson wrote:
Thanks for the responses, these objects are all older. However, none of
them are stale or from previous owners, allocations, etc. Each of these
objects were posted to their respective IRR's after the IP space was
allocated to us. This leads me to
courtneysm...@comcast.net wrote the following on 1/16/2014 12:26 PM:
On 16/01/2014 14:32, Blake Hudson wrote:
Thanks for the responses, these objects are all older. However, none of
them are stale or from previous owners, allocations, etc. Each of these
objects were posted to their respective
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Eric Krichbaum wrote:
I 100% agree with Nick. But, in dealing with Level3, you need Level3
Members Remarks in your objects to deal with multiple registries etc.
They have an ok system that is a nightmare to pull from different
datasources with them and they've churned
On 16/01/2014 21:22, Jon Lewis wrote:
Also, at least of the ones I've dealt with, there is no verification of
records as they're entered.
on the RIPE IRRDB, there is validation, so you can't just go in and
register route: objects for someone else's allocations or assignments. Not
sure about
On 2014-01-16 23:11, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 16/01/2014 21:22, Jon Lewis wrote:
Also, at least of the ones I've dealt with, there is no verification of
records as they're entered.
on the RIPE IRRDB, there is validation, so you can't just go in and
register route: objects for someone else's
On 15/01/2014 21:22, Blake Hudson wrote:
I have emailed Level3 about the incorrect entries in their IRR with no
response. I have also emailed Cogent about their incorrect entry in RADb,
also with no response.
Should I be concerned about these entries? Do these entries give someone
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Or perhaps this indicates that no one pays attention to what is in the
RAdb, and therefore makes a statement about the RAdb itself?
No idea myself...
- - ferg
On 1/15/2014 1:22 PM, Blake Hudson wrote:
Can someone provide a little guidance on
; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc
On 15/01/2014 21:22, Blake Hudson wrote:
I have emailed Level3 about the incorrect entries in their IRR with no
response. I have also emailed Cogent about their incorrect entry in
RADb, also with no response.
Should I
Blake,
If you find that an RADb maintainer is unresponsive about removing
stale/incorrect objects in the RADb, we will review your request
and can remove the objects in question.
Regards,
Larry Blunk
Merit
- Original Message -
Can someone provide a little guidance on RADb
12 matches
Mail list logo
