Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-10 Thread Christopher Morrow
... -Chris -Andy -Original Message- From: Dylan Ebner [mailto:dylan.eb...@crlmed.com] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:31 AM To: Andrew Nusbaum; Jim Cowie; Adam Kennedy Cc: NANOG Subject: RE: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16 I thought that may be the case

Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-10 Thread ML
Matthew Huff wrote: About 4 hours ago BGPmon picked up a rogue announcement of 129.77.0.0 from AS9035 (ASN-WIND Wind Telecomunicazioni spa) with an upstream of AS1267 (ASN-INFOSTRADA Infostrada S.p.A.). I don't see it now on any looking glass sites. Hopefully this was just a typo that was

Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-10 Thread christian
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:24 PM, ML m...@kenweb.org wrote: Matthew Huff wrote: About 4 hours ago BGPmon picked up a rogue announcement of 129.77.0.0 from AS9035 (ASN-WIND Wind Telecomunicazioni spa) with an upstream of AS1267 (ASN-INFOSTRADA Infostrada S.p.A.). I don't see it now on any

Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-09 Thread Wouter Prins
Hi Matthew, You are not the only one having this issue. They are announcing some other prefixes as well! 2009/10/9 Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com About 4 hours ago BGPmon picked up a rogue announcement of 129.77.0.0 from AS9035 (ASN-WIND Wind Telecomunicazioni spa) with an upstream of AS1267

Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-09 Thread Adam Kennedy
Agreed. Our prefixes at AS40060 were announced as well. I received a notification around 7:00am EDT that our prefixes were detected announced from AS9035 with the same upstream AS1267. On 10/9/09 8:34 AM, Wouter Prins w...@null0.nl wrote: Hi Matthew, You are not the only one having this

RE: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-09 Thread Dylan Ebner
We also received a notification that our IP block 67.135.55.0/24 (AS19629) is being annouced by AS9035. Hopefully someone is receiving my emails. Thanks Dylan Ebner, Network Engineer Consulting Radiologists, Ltd. 1221 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55403 ph. 612.573.2236 fax. 612.573.2250

Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-09 Thread Jim Cowie
Lots of people were affected, but none significantly. They originated 86,747 networks very briefly (less than a minute at 7:23 UTC), and I don't think anyone outside Telecom Italia's customer cone even saw them. So the impact was really, really limited. The correct origins were being

Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-09 Thread sjk
We are seeing the same ting with 66.146.192.0/19 66.251.224.0/19. According to cyclopes this is still continuing. . . Dylan Ebner wrote: We also received a notification that our IP block 67.135.55.0/24 (AS19629) is being annouced by AS9035. Hopefully someone is receiving my emails. Thanks

RE: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-09 Thread Dylan Ebner
the long delay is frustrating. Thanks Dylan Ebner -Original Message- From: Jim Cowie [mailto:co...@renesys.com] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:11 AM To: Adam Kennedy Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16 Lots of people were affected, but none

RE: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-09 Thread Dylan Ebner
I just received confirmation from AS9035 that they are not annoucing my IP block. Dylan Ebner, Network Engineer -Original Message- From: sjk [mailto:s...@sleepycatz.com] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:20 AM Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035

RE: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-09 Thread Andrew Nusbaum
[mailto:dylan.eb...@crlmed.com] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:23 AM To: Jim Cowie; Adam Kennedy Cc: NANOG Subject: RE: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16 Does anyone know why it takes BGPMon so long to send out an email. It looks like it BGPMon detected the AS9035 announcements

RE: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-09 Thread Dylan Ebner
...@mindspark.com] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:27 AM To: Dylan Ebner; Jim Cowie; Adam Kennedy Cc: NANOG Subject: RE: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16 Usually I get alerts from BGPMon within about 20 minutes of an event being detected. Not so much with the event

Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-09 Thread christian
this type of detection, so the long delay is frustrating. Thanks Dylan Ebner -Original Message- From: Jim Cowie [mailto:co...@renesys.com] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:11 AM To: Adam Kennedy Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16 Lots

RE: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16

2009-10-09 Thread Andrew Nusbaum
Message- From: Andrew Nusbaum [mailto:andrew.nusb...@mindspark.com] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:27 AM To: Dylan Ebner; Jim Cowie; Adam Kennedy Cc: NANOG Subject: RE: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16 Usually I get alerts from BGPMon within about 20 minutes of an event