Cameron Byrne allegedly wrote on 10/10/2010 15:38 EDT:
LTE provides some latency benefits on the wireless interface, but the
actual packet core architecture is very similar to GSM / UMTS.
and it's going to be a long time before Local Breakout gets noticeably
deployed.
-
From: Holmes,David A [mailto:dhol...@mwdh2o.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 9:42 PM
To: Seth Mattinen; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Mobile Operator Connectivity
Some large telcos with wireless and wireline operations in the US
maintain 2 separate backbones: one that I call wired
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 10/9/10 5:08 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
I have been working on a similar project and I am finding it very hard
to get the mobile operators to understand why we want as little latency
as possible and they are not very open
On 10/10/10 12:38 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 10/9/10 5:08 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
LTE provides an opportunity to move the bottleneck.
LTE provides some latency benefits on the wireless interface, but the
actual packet
.
-Original Message-
From: Holmes,David A [mailto:dhol...@mwdh2o.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 9:42 PM
To: Seth Mattinen; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Mobile Operator Connectivity
Some large telcos with wireless and wireline operations in the US
maintain 2 separate backbones: one
What is the IPX service?
-Original Message-
From: Jared Geiger [mailto:ja...@compuwizz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:58 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mobile Operator Connectivity
I would suggest getting on the GRX network. As an enterprise you should
be able to get IPX
I think the service Equinix hosts is for data roaming
-Original Message-
From: Leo Woltz [mailto:leo.wo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:16 PM
To: Jared Geiger
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mobile Operator Connectivity
Hi Jared
Is this different then the service
: Mobile Operator Connectivity
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Jared Geiger ja...@compuwizz.net
wrote:
I would suggest getting on the GRX network. As an enterprise you
should be able to get IPX service from any number of providers.
Belgacom, Syniverse, and Sybase365 all offer IP data service onto
I would suggest getting on the GRX network. As an enterprise you
should be able to get IPX service from any number of providers.
Belgacom, Syniverse, and Sybase365 all offer IP data service onto the
GRX. Then you aren't limited to just the US carriers, you'll be able
to reach most all carriers
Hi Jared
Is this different then the service at Equinix?
Leo
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jared Geiger ja...@compuwizz.net wrote:
I would suggest getting on the GRX network. As an enterprise you
should be able to get IPX service from any number of providers.
Belgacom, Syniverse, and
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Jared Geiger ja...@compuwizz.net wrote:
I would suggest getting on the GRX network. As an enterprise you
should be able to get IPX service from any number of providers.
Belgacom, Syniverse, and Sybase365 all offer IP data service onto the
GRX. Then you aren't
With the assumption that you will have a wired backhaul to your HQ over
which the retail access-layer devices connect to commerce servers, make
sure that the wireless carrier's gateways to their wired network (where
the wired backhaul is connected to) are geographically well-dispersed
such that
On 9/25/2010 13:37, Leo Woltz wrote:
I am looking for some guidance from the list. We will soon be deploying
wireless payment devices (CDMA/GSM). We are looking at options on where to
locate the servers that will run the backend payment gateways; we would like
the least amount of latency
13 matches
Mail list logo
