It’s the “remote capture” that scares me.
I was testing some Meraki kit, called their NOC to try to debug some Radius
issues, tech tells me “oh yes, I can see your traffic going hither and yon
between the test client and test server that are both in your office, and
looking at the packet
Honestly, in a lot of cases you don't even need a device to support
packet capture as a feature to add it as a feature once its
compromised. This is just FUD IMHO.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Paul Nash p...@nashnetworks.ca wrote:
I love the built-in remote packet captures,
You, the NSA,
I love the built-in remote packet captures,
You, the NSA, and lots and lots of hackers, ALL love the remote packet capture.
If Meraki support can turn it on, so can someone who penetrates their systems
(by getting a job there or by hacking), and then they get to see everything
happening
I happen to administer a deployment of almost exclusively Meraki gear; ~140
switches (mix of MS42 and MS22) and ~400 AP's (almost all MR16's).
I would *not* recommend them for this situation. If you've got a low-usage
scenario, they might be fine. The tech support quality has noticeably
declined
That's it. Step 1, buy the equipment at full price. Step 2, pay for the cloud
management license, yearly. Step 3, no extended warranty option, so pay full
price if equipment from step one fails.
As long as you're doing step 2 (which you *have* to, otherwise it's a brick),
isn't step 3 report
Of Mike Lyon
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:17 AM
To: Manuel Marín
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
Check out Xirrus
On Jan 28, 2015 9:08 PM, Manuel Marín m...@transtelco.net wrote:
Dear nanog community
I was wondering if you can recommend or share
Consultant
(407) 257-5115
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Lyon
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:17 AM
To: Manuel Marín
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
Check out Xirrus
On Jan 28, 2015
To: Eric C. Miller e...@ericheather.com
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2015 8:41:52 AM
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
We are substantially larger and use Aruba, but I am wondering why no one
has mentioned Meraki (now cisco-meraki). We tried one
: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 9:55 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
I try to avoid anything that Cisco has touched.
Also not a fan of their stop paying our recurring fee and the device
AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
I try to avoid anything that Cisco has touched.
Also not a fan of their stop paying our recurring fee and the device becomes a
brick policy.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Manuel Marín m...@transtelco.net wrote:
I was wondering if you can recommend or share your experience with APs that
you can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend recommended me
Ruckus Wireless, it would be great if you can share your experience
+1 on Xirrus or Ruckus if you care to sleep at night. Just my 2cents
Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com
On 1/30/15, 8:19 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
Paul Nash p...@nashnetworks.ca writes:
Ruckus is also *way* easier to configure than Cisco. Some of the
Cisco folk that I know think that that is a point in favour of
Cisco, as it adds to job security :-)
That matches my experience with Cisco 802.11 kit. Way too many knobs
exposed, and
level reliability.
Eric Miller, CCNP
Network Engineering Consultant
(407) 257-5115
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Lyon
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:17 AM
To: Manuel Marín
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400
Manuel MarÃn m...@transtelco.net writes:
I was wondering if you can recommend or share your experience with APs that
you can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend recommended me
Ruckus Wireless, it would be great if you can share your experience with
Ruckus or with a similar
: Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org
To: Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:34:46 AM
Subject: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
I had a bad experience with it one time at a tradeshow environment. 6
access points setup for public wifi
Subject: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
I had a bad experience with it one time at a tradeshow environment. 6
access points setup for public wifi. The radio levels were quite good in
various areas of the tradeshow however traffic would keep dropping out
at
random intervals
Hammett
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 10:53 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
Did you figure out why it was dropping out? All of it dropping out? Just some
APs dropping? Just some users dropping?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing
Hammett na...@ics-il.net,
nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:02:20 AM
Subject: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
Ruckus should work fine for you. You need to have a controller and need a good
RF plan but as far as capacity, throughput, roaming etc they are really
. Their
association with the AP would stay in tact
Paul
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 10:53 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
Did you figure out why
: Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org
To: Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:34:46 AM
Subject: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
I had a bad experience with it one time at a tradeshow environment. 6
access points setup for public wifi
Open – it was just for a trade show setting .. few years ago ….
Thanks,
Paul
From: Mike Lyon [mailto:mike.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:07 PM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: Mike Hammett; NANOG
Subject: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
Just curious, were
Mikrotik's also a rather good choice for the Wireless AP side...
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Eduardo Schoedler lis...@esds.com.br
wrote:
+1 Ruckus+ZoneDirector
--
Eduardo
Em quinta-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2015, Tyler Mills tylermi...@gmail.com
escreveu:
Have had a lot of
+1 Ruckus+ZoneDirector
--
Eduardo
Em quinta-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2015, Tyler Mills tylermi...@gmail.com
escreveu:
Have had a lot of experience with Ruckus(and Unifi unfortunately). The
Ruckus platform is one of the best. If you will be responsible for
supporting the deployment, it will
Aruba Networks is also good for wireless. I support ~2000 users spread out
over 50+ buildings on a small college campus. Lots of add on options like
Clearpass for NAC and guest provisioning and Airwave for historical data and RF
planning.
Good Luck!
Aaron Smith
- Original Message -
Make that +2. I am halfway through an install for about 800 users spread
through a multi-story building with around 100 R700 access points and ZD 3000.
Once you understand the basics, it is trivial to set up, easy to manage,
performance is superb.
Using RADIUS auth you can assign different
What problems have you had with UBNT?
It's zero hand-off doesn't work on unsecured networks, but that's about the
extent of the issues I've heard of other than stadium density environments.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original
Just curious. What kind of problems have you seen with the Ubiquiti solution?
I've had a few units in for testing a potential managed wireless for
rural libraries and so far they've been pretty rock solid for the
price. My biggest critique is that they don't support many features
and are fairly
...@paulstewart.org
To: Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:34:46 AM
Subject: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
I had a bad experience with it one time at a tradeshow environment. 6
access points setup for public wifi. The radio
Op 29 jan. 2015, om 17:18 heeft Tyler Mills tylermi...@gmail.com het volgende
geschreven:
Most of the issues are related to firmware. Most of my UBNT experience was
with the UAP-Pro and the UAP-AC, and it wasn't a good experience.
Production firmwares seem to be of beta quality.
It’s meh,
Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org
To: Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:34:46 AM
Subject: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
I had a bad experience
Fiske c...@bloomcounty.org
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:12:23 PM
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
Anyone played with/deployed any Mimosa gear? I’m not a “real” wireless guy so
I’ll spare folks any armchair speculation. Just looks
Yeah, most people ignore ZH. UBNT marketing hyped it up quite a bit,
and for a residential deployment it can work OK, but if you have any
kind of background in wireless you'll understand that it goes out the
window for a non-trivial deployment due to the requirement of all APs
sharing a channel.
[mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:23 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
What problems have you had with UBNT?
It's zero hand-off doesn't work on unsecured networks, but that's about the
extent
ian.sl...@saic.com | 703.676.5234
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Smith
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 7:13 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
Aruba Networks is also good for wireless. I
...@ics-il.net, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:34:46 AM
Subject: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
I had a bad experience with it one time at a tradeshow environment. 6 access
points setup for public wifi. The radio levels were quite good in various areas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
+1 Xirrus
On 01/29/2015 08:17 AM, Paul Nash wrote:
Make that +2. I am halfway through an install for about 800 users
spread through a multi-story building with around 100 R700 access
points and ZD 3000. Once you understand the basics, it is
-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:23 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
What problems have you had with UBNT?
It's zero hand-off doesn't work on unsecured networks
, January 29, 2015 10:18:31 AM
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
Most of the issues are related to firmware. Most of my UBNT experience was with
the UAP-Pro and the UAP-AC, and it wasn't a good experience. Production
firmwares seem to be of beta quality.
For features
: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
I had a bad experience with it one time at a tradeshow environment. 6
access points setup for public wifi. The radio levels were quite good in
various areas of the tradeshow however traffic would keep dropping out at
random intervals as soon
: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:34:46 AM
Subject: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
I had a bad experience with it one time at a tradeshow environment. 6 access
points setup for public wifi. The radio levels were quite good in various areas
of the tradeshow however traffic would
: Thursday, January 29, 2015 1:50:20 PM
Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
I have had this same behavior at my UniFi pilot site. What I discovered in my
case was a combination of bad behaviors in both the UniFi unit and Android.
Long story short Android
Check out Xirrus
On Jan 28, 2015 9:08 PM, Manuel Marín m...@transtelco.net wrote:
Dear nanog community
I was wondering if you can recommend or share your experience with APs that
you can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend recommended me
Ruckus Wireless, it would be great if
Have had a lot of experience with Ruckus(and Unifi unfortunately). The
Ruckus platform is one of the best. If you will be responsible for
supporting the deployment, it will save you a lot of frustration when
compared with UBNT.
On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 12:18:54 AM Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com
44 matches
Mail list logo
