If memory serves me right, Randy Bush wrote:
> is there a freebsd pam tacacs+ hack?
Yep. Haven't actually used it though.
PAM_TACPLUS(8) FreeBSD System Manager's Manual
PAM_TACPLUS(8)
NAME
pam_tacplus -- TACACS+ authentication PAM module
Bruce.
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:38 AM, John Levine wrote:
>
>> > Are passwords still the only lowest-common-denominator?
>>
>> There's OpenID, where a provider can use any verification process it
>> wants, but all the OpenID providers I know use o
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Since this plays nicely with eap-tls, 802.1x. ike, ssl/tls, and s/mime
it seems like a shoe-in, once you have a uniform authentication system
one is inclined to use it for everything. obviously being involved in
several of these with with multiple ca's is
cards and tokens are a proxy for the use of a certificate authentication
system...
You can in fact do certificate auth without the use of cards or tokens
or mix and match physical tokens and other private key storage depending
on need with the same authentication backend (typically ldap).
Since t
is there a freebsd pam tacacs+ hack?
randy
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:38 AM, John Levine wrote:
> > Are passwords still the only lowest-common-denominator?
>
> There's OpenID, where a provider can use any verification process it
> wants, but all the OpenID providers I know use ordinary passwords.
>
http://yubico.com/developers/openid/
I'
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:58:27PM -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> So it works as a standalone password vault also?
I don't know. My only experience with it has been as an OpenID
endpoint/provider/whatever, and it was on that basis that I replied
originally.
- Matt
So it works as a standalone password vault also?
Jeff
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:06:48PM -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
>> I was pretty excited about this post until I found out that myvidoop
>> only works on older version of FF.
>
> I can onl
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:06:48PM -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> I was pretty excited about this post until I found out that myvidoop
> only works on older version of FF.
I can only find something about the plugin not working on FF 3.5, but I
don't use the plugin since I only use it as an OpenID en
I was pretty excited about this post until I found out that myvidoop
only works on older version of FF.
Jeff
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 02:38:32PM -, John Levine wrote:
>> > Are passwords still the only lowest-common-denominator?
>>
>> T
[Sightly off-topic - solution specific] Some European countries have
long figured out logistics of smartcard distribution and management in
their healthcare systems - some being at the second generation,
already.
In fact this is a subject "dear" to my heart, as I've researched and
attempted a prop
Sadly, passwords are the least common denominator. The biggest problems
with 2 factor devices (smart cards, OTPs, etc) is having to buy, configure,
and distribute them; plus get them to work with all the myriad of
applications.
Certificates that are issued to computers/web browsers suffer from
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 02:38:32PM -, John Levine wrote:
> > Are passwords still the only lowest-common-denominator?
>
> There's OpenID, where a provider can use any verification process it
> wants, but all the OpenID providers I know use ordinary passwords.
myvidoop.com does OpenID auth base
John Levine wrote:
Are passwords still the only lowest-common-denominator?
There's OpenID, where a provider can use any verification process it
wants, but all the OpenID providers I know use ordinary passwords.
Yeah, and every ISP would probably use key authentication, except
there's not a
> Are passwords still the only lowest-common-denominator?
There's OpenID, where a provider can use any verification process it
wants, but all the OpenID providers I know use ordinary passwords.
R's,
John
15 matches
Mail list logo
