Re: Any technical-network issues? (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site)

2019-04-18 Thread Roy
On 4/18/2019 3:44 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Sean Donelan wrote: The Special Counsel's report is expected to be posted on its website sometime between 11 a.m. and noon on Thursday, April 18, 2019. Its been about 7 hours since the report was released on the SCO web site and

Any technical-network issues? (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site)

2019-04-18 Thread Sean Donelan
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Sean Donelan wrote: The Special Counsel's report is expected to be posted on its website sometime between 11 a.m. and noon on Thursday, April 18, 2019. Its been about 7 hours since the report was released on the SCO web site and to the news media. Ignoring the content of

Re: We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site)

2019-04-18 Thread Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
>> Oops..the link would be helpful, sorry! >> >> We have made the full report available here, including conclusions (full >> report both embedded by iframe, and linked to the actual report at DOJ). > > The DOJ web site is hosted on Akamai's CDN. I don't think anyone's > had trouble getting

Re: We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site)

2019-04-18 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >Oops..the link would be helpful, sorry! > >We have made the full report available here, including conclusions (full >report both embedded by iframe, and linked to the actual report at DOJ). The DOJ web site is hosted on Akamai's CDN. I don't think anyone's had trouble

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-18 Thread Randy Bush
> If you want NANOG to devolve into a morass of political claptrap you mean it could improve?

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-18 Thread Marco Belmonte
Exactly. In other words, don't be a social retard. On 4/18/2019 7:23 AM, Mel Beckman wrote: Rich, If you want NANOG to devolve into a morass of political claptrap, keep posting comments like that. Personally, I want NANOG to remain a useful technical

We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site)

2019-04-18 Thread Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Oops..the link would be helpful, sorry! We have made the full report available here, including conclusions (full report both embedded by iframe, and linked to the actual report at DOJ). https://www.theinternetpatrol.com/the-mueller-report-online-text-of-the-mueller-report-and-analysis/ Anne P.

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-18 Thread Mel Beckman
B just announced that they are offering free downloads via their Nook reader. I noticed I couldn’t reach B via IPv6, and discovered the cause : nslookup > set type= > barnesandnoble.com Server: 4.2.2.1 Non-authoritative answer: *** Can't find barnesandnoble.com: No answer > set

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-18 Thread Mel Beckman
Rich, If you want NANOG to devolve into a morass of political claptrap, keep posting comments like that. Personally, I want NANOG to remain a useful technical resource, and leave the partisan crap to Facebook and its ilk. -mel beckman > On Apr 18, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: >

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-18 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:02:52PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote: > The Special Counsel's report is expected to be posted [...] Not quite. A *version* of the report that has been redacted by the President's hand-picked obedient lackey will be posted. I suspect that the full report will find its way

RE: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-18 Thread Naslund, Steve
Agreed, I remember the biggest problem when the Starr Report was released was that our dial-up PoPs had all lines busy. It was a different Internet then. Steven Naslund Chicago IL > Hey Mike. > > Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? > Should be highly cached

RE: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-18 Thread Kain, Rebecca (.)
I can’t believe p2p isn’t used more, even inside companies. It does have legit uses From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mark Seiden Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:27 PM To: fwessl...@succinctsystems.com; Mark Tinka via NANOG Subject: Re: Special Counsel Office report web site of course p2p

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-18 Thread Jared Mauch
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:25:32AM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote: > Hey Mike. > > Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? Should > be highly cached with a good ratio of served to pull bits. I'm willing to > bet you a beer its just another day on the Internet. However, I

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-17 Thread mike . lyon
Deal. Though, like you, i am assuming it’ll just be another day on the intarwebs as well... We shall see! -Mike > On Apr 17, 2019, at 21:25, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > Hey Mike. > > Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? Should > be highly cached with a good

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-17 Thread Martin Hannigan
Hey Mike. Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? Should be highly cached with a good ratio of served to pull bits. I'm willing to bet you a beer its just another day on the Internet. However, I could be wrong. Hope to see you in DC to collect! I already know Brett is

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-17 Thread mike . lyon
Oh spiffy! Will be interesting to see if there are any problems then. -Mike > On Apr 17, 2019, at 21:14, Brett Watson wrote: > > Or maybe do this (faster than nanog archives) :) > > > bash-3.2# dig cia.gov ns > > ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> cia.gov ns > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-17 Thread Brett Watson
Or maybe do this (faster than nanog archives) :) bash-3.2# dig cia.gov ns ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> cia.gov ns ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 33203 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-17 Thread Martin Hannigan
Check the nANOG archives for examples of whitehouse.gov, cia.gov etc. It certainly is. On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 23:34 wrote: > Isn’t this why god invented CDNs? Though, i doubt the govment is > Akamized... > > -Mike > > On Apr 17, 2019, at 20:26, Mark Seiden wrote: > > of course p2p is the

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-17 Thread mike . lyon
Isn’t this why god invented CDNs? Though, i doubt the govment is Akamized... -Mike > On Apr 17, 2019, at 20:26, Mark Seiden wrote: > > of course p2p is the way to distribute this but i doubt the justice > department can admit there is any positive legitimate use for p2p. > > (i’ve been

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-17 Thread Mark Seiden
of course p2p is the way to distribute this but i doubt the justice department can admit there is any positive legitimate use for p2p. (i’ve been surprised that it hasn’t made it to wikileaks or bittorrent yet.   “russiar, are you listening?”) (i sure hope there’s a signed version or at least a

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-17 Thread fwessling--- via NANOG
And we may still see the web stack being the ultimate cause of the delay. Parkinson's law always comes to the rescue:-) More faster and efficient processing architecture, Hyper transport buses, amd-64 Branch prediction. Massively faster storage subsystems and disk arrays, SSD slab caching for

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-17 Thread Sean Donelan
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: Things will probably be easier this time. The Internet has evolved ways of dealing with exactly this problem. (Avi used to call it “slash-dot insurance”, but the idea is the same.) Specifically: Yep, it will be interesting to see where the

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2019-04-17 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Apr 17, 2019, at 9:02 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: > > The Special Counsel's report is expected to be posted on its website sometime > between 11 a.m. and noon on Thursday, April 18, 2019. > > https://www.justice.gov/sco > > Since I helped with website for the Starr Report on September 11,