On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Greg VILLAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an equivalent dilemma: I'm of course well educated about not
> de-aggregating and would like, as much as possible, to avoid it.
> I'm trying to build a small-bandwidth core across an MPLS VPN, and I haven't
> been ab
Sorry, typo'd the /21. He wants to carve into /22.
On 5/22/08 11:45 AM, "Joe Maimon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Yamasaki, Charles wrote:
>>> Make sure that your two location is inter-connected directly,
>>
>> Why is this required? If you put static routes to point the remote /21 to
>>
Yamasaki, Charles wrote:
Make sure that your two location is inter-connected directly,
Why is this required? If you put static routes to point the remote /21 to
the upstream provider on each side wouldn't that take care of the origin AS
loop?
Origin AS is easily handled by the allow-as-in
What if upstream connection - Internet - goes down?
If you have fully redundant system implemented from both locations, so
you don't need another site for operation,
that will be fine.
But in normal situation, there is some dependency.
Also, if you have massive backup and/or data transaction betwee
> Make sure that your two location is inter-connected directly,
Why is this required? If you put static routes to point the remote /21 to
the upstream provider on each side wouldn't that take care of the origin AS
loop?
On 5/22/08 10:45 AM, "Hyunseog Ryu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I I were
I I were you, I will advertise as following.
/21 Original ARIN allocation
/22 First half of ARIN allocation
/22 second half of ARIN allocation
In this case, you will have backup /21 route just in case of filtering
or something like that.
But in normal case, traffic will be routed based on more sp
On Thu, 22 May 2008, James Kelty wrote:
I'm looking for an opinion from the group. I have an ARIN /21 assignment and
a new requirement for a second data center. Rather than ask for another
assignment, I would like to advertise one /22 from one location and the other
/22 from the second locatio
James Kelty wrote:
Hey all,
I'm looking for an opinion from the group. I have an ARIN /21 assignment
and a new requirement for a second data center. Rather than ask for
another assignment, I would like to advertise one /22 from one location
and the other /22 from the second location both wit
fe is rarely as simple as ideals.
My 2e
Ben
-Original Message-
From: Scott Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 May 2008 17:49
To: 'James Kelty'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Splitting ARIN assignment
As long as your upstreams/partners are cool with that, ther
As long as your upstreams/partners are cool with that, there is no related
designation between how addresses are allocated versus how they are
announced.
In other words, TECHNICALLY you could advertise a whole bunch of /30's
You just run the risk of being filtered and/or ridiculed along the wa
10 matches
Mail list logo
