Naslund, Steve snasl...@medline.com writes:
From a Verizon press release last summer, all FIOS speeds are now symmetric.
And no one cares. I don't even see Verizon commercials crowing
about how great it is to have symmetry. If customers loved it that
much don't you think they would market
From a Verizon press release last summer, all FIOS speeds are now symmetric.
And no one cares. I don't even see Verizon commercials crowing about
how great it is to have symmetry. If customers loved it that much
don't you think they would market that way?
You must not get out much.
Naslund, Steve snasl...@medline.com writes:
From a Verizon press release last summer, all FIOS speeds are now symmetric.
And no one cares. I don't even see Verizon commercials crowing about
how great it is to have symmetry. If customers loved it that much
don't you think they would
Well, it's not quite that simple. I run a global network so I buy lots of
services in lots of countries and areas so I can tell you what out there even
though I don't see FIOS commercials on my local TV channels, we are quite aware
of the capabilities of FIOS and its competitors. I have lots
On March 2, 2015 at 13:21 na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) wrote:
The most important point is yes, that no one cares. If people wanted it, it
would be sold to them. End. of. story.
That presumes you can predict what will be sold tomorrow, which is
more what this discussion is about.
If
The backend is still symmetric. It's still something like 1.25 gigs up and 2.5
gigs down. You can only beat that going to AE.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Fletcher Kittredge fkitt...@gwi.net
To: NANOG
The backend is still symmetric. It's still something like 1.25 gigs up and 2.5
gigs down. You can only beat that going to AE.
Truth is, once the user is achieving what they consider to be acceptable
performance they don't care if it is symmetric or not.
Not a very informative discussion.
Damn A key... I mean asymmetric.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 1:00:04 PM
Subject: Re: Symmetry, DSL, and all
...@ics-il.net, NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 1:19:29 PM
Subject: RE: Symmetry, DSL, and all that
The backend is still symmetric. It's still something like 1.25 gigs up and 2.5
gigs down. You can only beat that going to AE.
Truth is, once the user is achieving what
On 03/02/2015 02:19 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
The backend is still symmetric. It's still something like 1.25 gigs up and 2.5
gigs down. You can only beat that going to AE.
Truth is, once the user is achieving what they consider to be acceptable
performance they don't care if it is symmetric
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 02:41:30PM -0500, Fletcher Kittredge wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote:
The most important point is yes, that no one cares. If people wanted it,
it would be sold to them. End. of. story.
I will repeat myself, speaking
11 matches
Mail list logo
