De-Aggregation: strict filtering /48s out of /32
RIR minimums.
.
/snip
Thoughts...?
Ben
-Original Message-
From: Ben S. Butler
Sent: 15 November 2012 00:05
To: 'Michael Smith'; William Herrin
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: What is BCP re De-Aggregation: strict filtering /48s out of /32
RIR minimums.
Hi,
Again, I thought the discussion was about
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Ben S. Butler
ben.but...@c2internet.net wrote:
Hi,
...
snip
...
What we need is a way to filter that says throw this prefix away if I can see
it inside of another prefix. Ie discard this /48 if it is part of a /32 (or
bigger) that I also have in my RIB and
Hi,
Ok. I am trying to encourage an inclusive exploration of an issue that seems to
be emergent. I am trying to get the community to articulate BCP not dictate it.
Would you want this logic to still apply if you have ::/0 in your table
anywhere?
Yes obviously limits would apply to the filter
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Ben S. Butler ben.but...@c2internet.netwrote:
3 Don't use filters, generate it from an IRR?
Given there is no right answer what is considered to be the best fit one?
This sounds like your best bet. Assuming you can find an IRR with
comprehensive enough
[mailto:ops.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 November 2012 13:25
To: Ben S. Butler
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: What is BCP re De-Aggregation: strict filtering /48s out of /32
RIR minimums.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Ben S. Butler
ben.but...@c2internet.netmailto:ben.but...@c2internet.net wrote:
3 Don't
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Ben S. Butler
ben.but...@c2internet.net wrote:
So what is the best answer.
1 Don't advertise islands of space under assignment minimum, without
providing a covering aggregate route?
2 Don't use strict filters, they don't work well and
On 11/14/2012 6:02 PM, William Herrin wrote:
and send a polite email to the POC to the effect of, Please beware
that because you have not offered a covering route matching your
allocation, your IPv6 network is not reachable from ours. IPv6 is not
IPv4: end users requiring /48s for multihoming
Habicht [mailto:ge...@geier.ne.tz]
Sent: 14 November 2012 16:56
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: What is BCP re De-Aggregation: strict filtering /48s out of /32
RIR minimums.
On 11/14/2012 6:02 PM, William Herrin wrote:
and send a polite email to the POC to the effect of, Please beware
-Aggregation: strict filtering /48s out of /32
RIR minimums.
On 11/14/2012 6:02 PM, William Herrin wrote:
and send a polite email to the POC to the effect of, Please beware
that because you have not offered a covering route matching your
allocation, your IPv6 network is not reachable from ours
In a message written on Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 01:10:57PM +, Ben S. Butler
wrote:
I am hoping for a bit of advice. We are rolling out IPv6 en mass now to
peers and I am finding that our strict IPv6 ingress prefix filter is
meaning a lot of peers are sending me zero prefixes. Upon
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Ben S. Butler
ben.but...@c2internet.net wrote:
Yes, nice. But... It does not address the case when this is
not the ISPs customers but the ISP (read content provider)
that operates globally but without a network interconnecting
their routers.
Hi Ben,
That case
On Nov 14, 2012, at 10:06 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Ben S. Butler
ben.but...@c2internet.net wrote:
Yes, nice. But... It does not address the case when this is
not the ISPs customers but the ISP (read content provider)
that operates globally
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Michael Smith mksm...@mac.com wrote:
I guess I'm confused. I have a /32 that I have broken up
into /47's for my discrete POP locations. I don't have a
network between them, by design. And, I won't
announce the /32 covering route because there is
no single
On Nov 14, 2012, at 1:50 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Michael Smith mksm...@mac.com wrote:
I guess I'm confused. I have a /32 that I have broken up
into /47's for my discrete POP locations. I don't have a
network between them, by design. And, I
is BCP re De-Aggregation: strict filtering /48s out of /32
RIR minimums.
On Nov 14, 2012, at 1:50 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Michael Smith mksm...@mac.com wrote:
I guess I'm confused. I have a /32 that I have broken up into /47's
for my
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Michael Smith mksm...@mac.com wrote:
On Nov 14, 2012, at 1:50 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Michael Smith mksm...@mac.com wrote:
I guess I'm confused. I have a /32 that I have broken up
into /47's for my discrete
17 matches
Mail list logo
