Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Mark Foo
NANOG: Look, the people posting here who are trashing Intercage are pure security analysts -- they know and understand the evil that is Intercage. STOP TRYING TO ASSIST INTERCAGE -- you are effectively aiding and abetting the enemy. Intercage/Atrivo hosts the malware cc botnets that DDoS your

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Paul Ferguson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe the blocks your referring to are their 85.255 Blocks? Registered to InHoster. I

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Russell Mitchell
] To: Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:11:39 PM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2008

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Paul Ferguson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry I didn't make this clear enough in the previous responses. The prefixes that are registered to Inhoster belong to Esthost. I'm not sure how or why you think those

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Pedram M
Wow, this topic has really gotten old. On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry I didn't make this clear enough in the previous

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Russell Mitchell
Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:08:21 PM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer NANOG: Look, the people posting here who are trashing Intercage are pure security analysts -- they know and understand the evil that is Intercage. STOP TRYING TO ASSIST

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Russell Mitchell
. - Original Message From: Pedram M [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:38:54 PM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer Wow, this topic has really gotten old. On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: -BEGIN

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Paul Ferguson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope soon, people will realise and accept the truth that we are a LEGITIMATE Company that DOES Operate in the USA. We are NOT directly or in-directly related to any

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Russell Mitchell
] To: Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:20:59 AM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Mark Foo
PROTECTED] Cc: Christopher Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@nanog.org; Joe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:08:21 PM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer NANOG: Look, the people posting here who are trashing Intercage are pure security

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Paul Ferguson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Mark Foo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Answer Ferg's question -- Why are you moving to CERNAL? Do you think this is going to work? That's just another of Emil's networks. Actually, I was not being coy. Okay, maybe I

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Russell Mitchell
12:27:50 AM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer Russell: Ferg was just being coy -- what you don't understand is there are about 3 other security mailing lists plotting to TAKE YOUR SERVICE DOWN. You FAIL. Law Enforcement might not take action against you (but appear

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Mark Foo
] To: Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Bruce Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Christopher Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@nanog.org; Joe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:27:50 AM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer Russell: Ferg was just

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Paul Wall
Russell, Thanks to the efforts of the people on this list, you've known Estdomains/Esthost was bad news for several weeks or more. Why are you only now shutting them down? Thank you for proving that our research was not for naught, and that Atrivo/Intercage is a black hat operation which needs

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Russell Mitchell
] To: Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Bruce Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Christopher Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@nanog.org; Joe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:27:50 AM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer Russell: Ferg was just

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! Thanks to the efforts of the people on this list, you've known Estdomains/Esthost was bad news for several weeks or more. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dig estdomains.com ; DiG 9.5.0-P2 estdomains.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id:

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Pedram M
, 2008 1:14:01 AM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer Russell: Oh I got the memo, you'll be getting served one soon too. I just wonder why you don't consider playing both sides of the fence -- with your knowledge of who's who in the cyber crime field, you could

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Pedram M
PROTECTED]; Christopher Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@nanog.org; Joe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 1:14:01 AM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer Russell: Oh I got the memo, you'll be getting served one soon too. I just wonder why you don't

RE: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread michael.dillon
It is clear to me -- at least -- that this entire criminal operation is being operated out of Eastern Europe, and their foothold in the U.S. is the major issue here. If you believe that this is a criminal operation then you should keep this discussion OFF THE LIST and discourage anyone from

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Russell Mitchell
, Inc. - Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 2:23:01 AM Subject: RE: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer It is clear to me -- at least -- that this entire criminal operation is being operated out

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Gadi Evron
PROTECTED]; Christopher Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@nanog.org; Joe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 1:14:01 AM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer Russell: Oh I got the memo, you'll be getting served one soon too. I just wonder why you don't

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Joe Greco
Hello Joe, If we can't power down the machine, due to evidence loss. We can't nullroute the IP, as stated, some malware will delete itself or alter itself when Net Access is lost. Now we can filter a single port, in the case of spam, phishing, etc? You can do whatever you need to, of

RE: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread James Thomas
Very well said. James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 5:23 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer It is clear to me -- at least -- that this entire criminal operation

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 04:19:16AM -0400, Paul Wall wrote: Thanks to the efforts of the people on this list, you've known Estdomains/Esthost was bad news for several weeks or more. Why are you only now shutting them down? several weeks? Try several years. And do note the rationale (below)

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-24 Thread Paul Wall
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Paul, Those are their IP Blocks. We were simply routing them, as they were our client. They've owned these blocks for quite a while. They seem to have moved that after a day of being down. You're not very

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Paul Wall
Hold the rejoicing, Atrivo is back, this time on UnitedLayer. I'd contact them, only they seem to change CTOs every month or two, does anybody know who's currently in charge? Thank you, and Drive Slow, Paul Wall

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Paul Ferguson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well, their management team is listed here: http://www.unitedlayer.com/team.html - - ferg On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Paul Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hold the rejoicing, Atrivo is back, this time on UnitedLayer. I'd contact them, only

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Russell Mitchell
Mitchell=0A=0AInterCage, Inc.=0A=0A= =0A=0A- Original Message =0AFrom: Paul Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]= =0ATo: Mark Foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]=0ACc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tues= day, September 23, 2008 5:46:58 PM=0ASubject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage= : NO Upstream depeer=0A=0AHold the rejoicing, Atrivo

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Joe Greco
5:46:58 PM=0ASubject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage= : NO Upstream depeer=0A=0AHold the rejoicing, Atrivo is back, this time on = UnitedLayer.=0A=0AI'd contact them, only they seem to change CTOs every mon= th or two,=0Adoes anybody know who's currently in charge?=0A=0AThank you, a= nd Drive

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Christopher Morrow
Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]= =0ATo: Mark Foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]=0ACc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tues= day, September 23, 2008 5:46:58 PM=0ASubject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage= : NO Upstream depeer=0A=0AHold the rejoicing, Atrivo is back, this time on = UnitedLayer.=0A=0AI'd contact them, only they seem

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Joe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would suggest a different Step 1. Instead of killing power, simply isolate the affected machine. This might be as simple as putting up a firewall rule or two, if it is simply sending outgoing SMTP spam, or it's probably

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Bruce Williams
using bolt cutters on cables has a certain satisfaction... On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Christopher Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Joe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would suggest a different Step 1. Instead of killing power, simply isolate the

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Russell Mitchell
Apologies, Yahoo was set to Rich Text :( - Hello All, It seems you all missed the memo.As of about 11PM PST Last night 09/22/08, Esthost has been ENTIRELY Shutdown. They no longer have ANY Machine on my network. I'm currently starting to monitor some of the public media, such as google,

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Paul Ferguson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Russ, While I think that is great and everything, can you explain why Cernel is now originating prefixes which were originally originated by Atrivo/Intercage? I'd be curious as to your explanation. Thanks, - - ferg On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Paul Ferguson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It may be true that Estdomains has moved a couple of the external-facing a hosting hosts into the a Netherlands hosting provider in conjunction with this whole situation -- folks are watching very carefully. estdomains.com A 94.102.49.3

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Russell Mitchell
for your time. Have a great day.  --- Russell Mitchell InterCage, Inc. - Original Message From: Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 9:22:03 PM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Russell Mitchell
Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 8:20:18 PM Subject: Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer Hello All,=0A=A0=0AIt seems you all missed the memo.=0AAs of about 11PM PST=   Last night 09/22/08, Esthost has been ENTIRELY Shutdown

Re: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

2008-09-23 Thread Paul Ferguson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Russell Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe the blocks your referring to are their 85.255 Blocks? Registered to InHoster. I believe those prefixes are an entity of their's, though I don't know for sure.