On 7/21/2015 4:05 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:13:48 -0400, Curtis Maurand
wrote:
At least in Maine where I am, TWC does allow you to bring your own
modem as long as it's DOCSIS 3 compliant and there's lots of those
from motorola, netgear and others. You're not stuck with th
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:13:48 -0400, Curtis Maurand
wrote:
At least in Maine where I am, TWC does allow you to bring your own modem
as long as it's DOCSIS 3 compliant and there's lots of those from
motorola, netgear and others. You're not stuck with the Ubee.
You are ignoring the "BUSINESS
Furst rule of dealing with $CABLECO — If you don’t like the answer you get on
this phone call, redial. The next person will probably give you a different
answer. Certainly you can almost always get the answer you are looking for
(even if it’s wrong) within 5 calls if you are that patient.
Owen
On 7/20/2015 5:59 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 06:45:43 -0400, Seth Mos wrote:
For now, all the customers with the Ubee in bridge mode are SOL. It's
not clear what the reason is, but Ubee in bridge mode with IPv6 is
listed on the road map. If that's intentional policy or that th
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 06:45:43 -0400, Seth Mos wrote:
For now, all the customers with the Ubee in bridge mode are SOL. It's
not clear what the reason is, but Ubee in bridge mode with IPv6 is
listed on the road map. If that's intentional policy or that the
firmware isn't ready yet is not clear
The best way to "complain" is to simply move the service to another
provider (when possible). 50 bucks a month of revenue to them is not worth
the hassle of having a tech user asking for all sorts of non-standard
configs. It shouldn't be that way, but that's how it usually goes. Think
about it, eve
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> I had to beat up on AT&T quite a bit, but instead of letting them "make
> notes", escalate to tier-2 because you can't reach work. Explain that you
> must have IPv6 to reach work to the tier-2. If they won't help demand to
> be escalated fur
I had to beat up on AT&T quite a bit, but instead of letting them "make
notes", escalate to tier-2 because you can't reach work. Explain that you
must have IPv6 to reach work to the tier-2. If they won't help demand to
be escalated further. Your time on the phone costs them money.
On Sat, Jul 1
Ricky Beam schreef op 18-7-2015 om 1:14:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 06:25:26 -0400, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
mean that your UBee has to do dhcpv6? (or the downstream thingy from
the UBee has to do dhcpv6?)
The Ubee "router" is in bridge mode. Customers have ZERO access to the
thing, even when it i
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 06:25:26 -0400, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
mean that your UBee has to do dhcpv6? (or the downstream thingy from
the UBee has to do dhcpv6?)
The Ubee "router" is in bridge mode. Customers have ZERO access to the
thing, even when it is running in routed mode. So I have no i
On 7/17/15, 6:25 AM, "Christopher Morrow" wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:20:11 -0400, Lee Howard wrote:
>>>
>>> Business Class DOCSIS customers get a prefix automatically (unless you
>>> provide your own gateway and DHCPv6 isn¹t enabled).
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:20:11 -0400, Lee Howard wrote:
>>
>> Business Class DOCSIS customers get a prefix automatically (unless you
>> provide your own gateway and DHCPv6 isn¹t enabled).
>
doesn't the last paranthetical here
>
> I looked last
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:20:11 -0400, Lee Howard wrote:
Business Class DOCSIS customers get a prefix automatically (unless you
provide your own gateway and DHCPv6 isn¹t enabled).
I looked last night at the office in Cary, NC. NO RAs are seen on the link
coming from the Ubee (bridged) providing
On 7/13/15, 3:43 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Ricky Beam"
wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 17:32:33 -0400, Ca By wrote:
>> Yes, move your business to TWC. TWC has a proven v6 deployment and is
>> actively engaged in the community, as where vz Fios is not.
>
>Yes, because TWC-BC's IPv6 support is stella
From: Mel Beckman [mailto:m...@beckman.org]
>
> David,
> Did you consider running an IPv6 tunnel through HE.net?
>
We couldn't get the desired throughput via HE tunnel. We tried it, then
switched to v6 through VPN using a slice of our own allocation, but
ultimately didn't want that overhead ei
On Jul 13, 2015, at 1:57 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> David,
> Did you consider running an IPv6 tunnel through HE.net?
Tunnels work, but they really are getting old. I have run 3ffe:: 6bone, HE
tunnels, and (currently) aiccu. They all work very reliably, and I have
immense gratitude towards the
David,
Did you consider running an IPv6 tunnel through HE.net?
-mel via cell
> On Jul 13, 2015, at 1:46 PM, David Hubbard
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Paul B. Henson wrote:
>>
>> Seems to be a lot less noise on this iteration of the shake fist at
>> Verizon's lack of IPv6 thread, I gue
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> Seems to be a lot less noise on this iteration of the shake fist at
> Verizon's lack of IPv6 thread, I guess everybody is pretty much burned
> out and given up 8-/. Verizon should just update their IPv6 status
> page with a link to hurricane electric
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Paul B. Henson wrote:
Seems to be a lot less noise on this iteration of the shake fist at
Verizon's lack of IPv6 thread, I guess everybody is pretty much burned out
and given up 8-/. Verizon should just update their IPv6 status page with a
link to hurricane electric's tunnel
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 17:32:33 -0400, Ca By wrote:
Yes, move your business to TWC. TWC has a proven v6 deployment and is
actively engaged in the community, as where vz Fios is not.
Yes, because TWC-BC's IPv6 support is stellar. Sorry, I misspelled
"non-existent".
Their "DIA" (metro-e) stuff
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:06:56 -0700
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> > From: John Peach
> > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 5:02 AM
> >
> > smtps was deprecated years ago and is not implemented in postfix,
> > hence the need for stunnel. I should have said they don't implement
> > STARTTLS on either 25 or 5
> From: John Peach
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 5:02 AM
>
> smtps was deprecated years ago and is not implemented in postfix, hence
> the need for stunnel. I should have said they don't implement STARTTLS
> on either 25 or 587.
Oh, ok; I assumed you were talking about a client, not an MTA. Why a
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:38:13 -0700
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 05:35:35PM -0400, John Peach wrote:
> > and I wouldn't hold my breath over IPv6; I have to run stunnel so I
> > can send email from home because they don't even use TLS. Having
>
> Hmm, I just recently set u
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, Paul B. Henson wrote:
I think it's been about a year and a half since I last looked (and
cried) at the status of FIOS IPv6. As far as I can tell, there's been no
new official news since 2013. We're deploying IPv6 at the university I
work at, so IPv6 at home is moving from "w
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:31:54AM +, Mel Beckman wrote:
> Just set up the tunnel. It works beautifully.
Yeah, I probably will. Shouldn't expose my bluff, but I probably won't
switch to business cable, I actually use my upstream 8-/. But I needed
to get in one last rant before I went that wa
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 05:35:35PM -0400, John Peach wrote:
> and I wouldn't hold my breath over IPv6; I have to run stunnel so I
> can send email from home because they don't even use TLS. Having
Hmm, I just recently set up my mail client to use Verizon's smtp
servers, and TLS seemed to work
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 02:32:33PM -0700, Ca By wrote:
> Yes, move your business to TWC. TWC has a proven v6 deployment and is
> actively engaged in the community, as where vz Fios is not.
>
> Business only understand $
Yah, cheap bastards :). I've got 50/50 fios right now; TWC can match the
do
Just set up the tunnel. It works beautifully.
And thank you, HE.net, for being such a stellar tech leader!
-mel
> On Jul 12, 2015, at 2:26 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
>
> I think it's been about a year and a half since I last looked (and
> cried) at the status of FIOS IPv6. As far as I can tel
The only reason I have FIOS is because they gave me a 2 year deal of
15/15 internet for $30/month. Their advertising is basically just lies
and I wouldn't hold my breath over IPv6; I have to run stunnel so I can
send email from home because they don't even use TLS. Having said
that, I have an H
On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I think it's been about a year and a half since I last looked (and
> cried) at the status of FIOS IPv6. As far as I can tell, there's been no
> new official news since 2013. We're deploying IPv6 at the university I
> work at, so IPv6 at home is mo
30 matches
Mail list logo
