On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:58:20 PM Petter Bruland wrote:
We contacted Level3 a few weeks back, and were told that
they do not provide any filtering service. I've not been
able to confirm this from anyone else, besides the
Level3 customer service rep we spoke with.
We've received such
I would personally look at leaving Level 3 over that kind of response.
I consider it basic service to throw a 1 line acl on an interface
temporarily in exceptional circumstances. Transit guys can argue if
they wish, but it won't change my expectations as a customer.
Eventually I'll find a carrier
You can't really have your cake, and eat it too.
If this is a deal breaker for anyone, getting it in writing within the
contract should be the most basic of steps to undertake. Asking
beforehand will also actually let you know who will and won't do this,
thus avoid surprises like these
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 03:51:56 PM Blake Dunlap wrote:
I would personally look at leaving Level 3 over that kind
of response. I consider it basic service to throw a 1
line acl on an interface temporarily in exceptional
circumstances. Transit guys can argue if they wish, but
it won't change
We contacted Level3 a few weeks back, and were told that they do not provide
any filtering service.
I've not been able to confirm this from anyone else, besides the Level3
customer service rep we spoke with.
Currently looking into a DDoS protection service from Akamai. Sounds awesome
what they
Are you asking a transit network to filter specific ports as an end user
or as an ISP who has Level 3 as a transit provider?
I haven't seen a specific port could be dropped by any networkOnly
aware of BGP community string like, 3356: - black hole (discard all
traffic for specific IP
Not specific ports, but something more like:
'deny udp any my.target.slash.25 0.0.255.255'
BGP blackholing will obviously impact all traffic to a target.
-chris
2014-05-12 15:20 GMT-07:00 Bob Evans b...@fiberinternetcenter.com:
Are you asking a transit network to filter specific ports as an
Ahh, Yep, same thing port and/or protocol for an address range. I haven't
seen that accomplished via BGP. I know ATT will do it - they want about 2K
more per month for that ability. All your traffic is redirected (extra
hops ) through a firewall. So, it's a basic expensive firewall service.
We
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Bob Evans wrote:
Ahh, Yep, same thing port and/or protocol for an address range. I haven't
seen that accomplished via BGP. I know ATT will do it - they want about 2K
more per month for that ability. All your traffic is redirected (extra
hops ) through a firewall. So, it's
On May 12, 2014 6:53 PM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org
wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Bob Evans wrote:
Ahh, Yep, same thing port and/or protocol for an address range. I
haven't
seen that accomplished via BGP. I know ATT will do it - they want about
2K
more per month for that
10 matches
Mail list logo
