RE: www.RT.com bad dns record

2016-07-08 Thread Tony Hain
Matt Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:36:23PM -0700, Ca By wrote: > > On Thursday, July 7, 2016, Spencer Ryan wrote: > > > > > Dotted-quad notation is completely valid, and works fine. > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_address#Presentation > > > > > >

Re: www.RT.com bad dns record

2016-07-08 Thread Baldur Norddahl
On 2016-07-08 04:33, Matt Palmer wrote: On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:36:23PM -0700, Ca By wrote: On Thursday, July 7, 2016, Spencer Ryan wrote: Dotted-quad notation is completely valid, and works fine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_address#Presentation

Re: www.RT.com bad dns record

2016-07-07 Thread Matt Palmer
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:36:23PM -0700, Ca By wrote: > On Thursday, July 7, 2016, Spencer Ryan wrote: > > > Dotted-quad notation is completely valid, and works fine. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_address#Presentation > > > > http://[:::37.48.108.112] loads

Re: www.RT.com bad dns record

2016-07-07 Thread Ca By
On Thursday, July 7, 2016, Spencer Ryan wrote: > Dotted-quad notation is completely valid, and works fine. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_address#Presentation > > http://[:::37.48.108.112] loads fine in my browsers. > > > Spencer, It may be legit on your network,

Re: www.RT.com bad dns record

2016-07-07 Thread Spencer Ryan
Dotted-quad notation is completely valid, and works fine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_address#Presentation http://[:::37.48.108.112] loads fine in my browsers. *Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sr...@arbor.net *Arbor Networks* +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m)