This is a complete aside, but still germane given todays date.
For the youngsters among us, the title of this RFC is a sarcastic homage to one
of the landmark computer papers of the 1960s: “Go To Statement Considered
Harmful“, by legendary computer scientist Edsger Dijkstra. Published to the
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 3:12 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> If there's a bug in an ISP's implementation of RFC2549 carrier
> 'equipment', is that considered a software bug, hardware, or subject of
> ornithological research?
>
>
Certainly that would depend on what part of the pipeline was involved, no?
If there's a bug in an ISP's implementation of RFC2549 carrier 'equipment',
is that considered a software bug, hardware, or subject of ornithological
research?
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 10:40, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's super official now: no more software bugs in networking
Hi all,
It's super official now: no more software bugs in networking gear.
Sorry it took so long to document what the best current practise is!
Kind regards,
Job / Chris / Remco
- Forwarded message from rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org -
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:
4 matches
Mail list logo
