Peace,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:54 AM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> Those were all helpfully routed, until quite recently, to Mr. Cohen
The person with exactly the same name now runs for the RIPE NCC
Executive Board membership.
* r...@tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) [Fri 20 Sep 2019, 00:50 CEST]:
Leaving aside the minor quibble that "Dutch" is not, as far as I am
aware, a "race" per se, I do apologize for having improperly and
quite wrongly generalized the apparent confluence of of certain
events and actions
In message <20190919084649.gc30...@jima.tpb.net>,
niels=na...@bakker.net wrote:
>* r...@tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) [Thu 19 Sep 2019, 10:05 CEST]:
>>I never like to generalize to entire populations, and I will
>>therefore refrain from suggesting any endemic or widespread defect
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:43 AM William Herrin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 7:58 AM Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>>
>> What I'm asking is: "there is already repair for the harmed parties,
>> if they are not taking advantage of this then I don't think we need to
>> spend more time on
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 7:58 AM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> What I'm asking is: "there is already repair for the harmed parties,
> if they are not taking advantage of this then I don't think we need to
> spend more time on this topic"
>
Hi Chris,
I respectfully disagree with the assertion that
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:05 AM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
>
> In message
>
> Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
> >"who cares about the sale?"
>
> My apologies. I see that I have failed to be adequately clear.
>
I was misunderstood I think.
What I'm asking is: "there is already repair for the
* r...@tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) [Thu 19 Sep 2019, 10:05 CEST]:
I never like to generalize to entire populations, and I will
therefore refrain from suggesting any endemic or widespread defect
in the Dutch national psyche, but I cannot help but note that, as
pointed out in the
In message
Christopher Morrow wrote:
>"who cares about the sale?"
My apologies. I see that I have failed to be adequately clear.
There was no "sale". There was only theft, and then stolen goods
being passed from hand to hand to hand, ultimately ending up in the
hands of Mr. Cohen, who has
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:19 PM Ben Cannon wrote:
> With the difficulty of getting IPs off SPAM RBLs being what they are, I’m
> not sure I like the bone-chilling idea of accepting null-routing entire
> ranges as standard practice.
>
I didn't say spam-rbl.
>
> Same reasons, no central
With the difficulty of getting IPs off SPAM RBLs being what they are, I’m not
sure I like the bone-chilling idea of accepting null-routing entire ranges as
standard practice.
Same reasons, no central repository, no easy/quick/objective/cheap way to
remove an illegitimate entry - and then the
I tried to ask this earlier, I think, but...
"who cares about the sale?"
I ask this because I think getting wrapped around that axle is the
wrong place to spend resources.
If the outcome of 'someone' controlling IP space is that there is
abusive activity coming from that space and either no
It would be good to see some receipts, offered by the selling party.
12 matches
Mail list logo
