On 2/1/2011 10:10 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
We've sold routers for years, but make it clear to our customer that we are
doing this as a convenience to the customer and that we are not responsible
for it.
I agree with you, but I also know my telco's. It would go horribly wrong. :)
Jack
x27;re familiar with makes
it easier.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Dan White [mailto:dwh...@olp.net]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 9:51 AM
To: Jack Bates
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
On 31/01/11 09:28 -0600, Jack Bates
On 1/31/2011 9:51 AM, Dan White wrote:
That rules out 3rd party firmware like dd-wrt, since the customer is
unlikely to get support when calling the vendor.
At this point, I'd be happy with two good options (two different vendors)
to recommend. So far, D-link is looking good.
Yeah, don't get
On 31/01/11 09:28 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/31/2011 9:23 AM, Chris Conn wrote:
As for the DIR-615, it should, but it doesn't...At least, the E3/E4
revisions I had. I contacted D-LINK support and was able to get a beta
build that seems promising. But DHCP-PD over PPPoE works relatively
we
On 1/31/2011 9:23 AM, Chris Conn wrote:
As for the DIR-615, it should, but it doesn't...At least, the E3/E4
revisions I had. I contacted D-LINK support and was able to get a beta
build that seems promising. But DHCP-PD over PPPoE works relatively
well, minus a couple of little "features". I
On 27/01/11 08:17 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
looking for. The DIR-655 is a more affordable option.
Haven't had the chance to look at that one. Will check it out.
In regards to (2)
On 1/27/11 10:40 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> --- frnk...@iname.com wrote:
> From: "Frank Bulk"
>
> Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
> ---
>
>
>
> Ewww, yuck! "...this router utilizes dual active firewalls (SPI and NAT
On Thu, January 27, 2011 2:31 pm, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> On 1/27/11 10:01 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
>> For god's sake, stay away from the DIR-825(Rev A), which has been
effectively abandoned by DLINK support and has no IPv6 support at all.
> pretty sure you can't find those on the shelf...
> The current
unlike a simpler device you can actually turn that off.
in fact it has more knobs than you've likely seen in a consumer cpe...
joel
On 1/27/11 10:40 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> --- frnk...@iname.com wrote:
> From: "Frank Bulk"
>
> Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the thi
On 1/27/11 10:01 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
>
> For god's sake, stay away from the DIR-825(Rev A), which has been
> effectively abandoned by DLINK support and has no IPv6 support at all.
pretty sure you can't find those on the shelf...
The current model I bought on a lark for someone for christmas 2
--- frnk...@iname.com wrote:
From: "Frank Bulk"
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
---
Ewww, yuck! "...this router utilizes dual active firewalls (SPI and NAT) to
prevent potential attacks from across the Internet.
On 01/27/2011 12:46 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
On 1/27/11 7:33 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/27/2011 9:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
The DIR-825(Rev B) running firmware 2.05NA does. From the status screen:
IPv6 Connection Type : Autoconfiguration (SLAAC/DHCPv6)
Nice. New love for D-Link then.
On 1/27/11 7:33 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
>
>
> On 1/27/2011 9:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
>>
>> The DIR-825(Rev B) running firmware 2.05NA does. From the status screen:
>>
>> IPv6 Connection Type : Autoconfiguration (SLAAC/DHCPv6)
>
> Nice. New love for D-Link then. I've had DSL modem vendors s
@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
On 1/27/2011 9:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
>
> The DIR-825(Rev B) running firmware 2.05NA does. From the status screen:
>
> IPv6 Connection Type : Autoconfiguration (SLAAC/DHCPv6)
Nice. New love for D-Lin
Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 8:18 AM
To: frnk...@iname.com
Cc: Owen DeLong; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Have yo
On 1/27/2011 9:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
The DIR-825(Rev B) running firmware 2.05NA does. From the status screen:
IPv6 Connection Type : Autoconfiguration (SLAAC/DHCPv6)
Nice. New love for D-Link then. I've had DSL modem vendors sending me
their IPv6 stuff. It's been horrid. Luckily,
On 27/01/11 08:17 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
looking for. The DIR-655 is a more affordable option.
Haven't had the chance to look at that one. Will check it out.
In regards to (2),
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
looking for. The DIR-655 is a more affordable option.
Haven't had the chance to look at that one. Will check it out.
In regards to (2), is it even possible to do DHCPv6-PD on with
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Richard Barnes wrote:
Could you elaborate? Which circumstances?
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
It works for routing native IPv6 under some circumstances as well.
If the broadband service is provided with bridged mode (i.e. If your
router gets I
er.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:59 AM
To: Owen DeLong
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
I believe it has to do with IPv6 mechanisms for handling native
I believe it has to do with IPv6 mechanisms for handling native
addressing. I haven't had the opportunity to test it myself, but from
dealing with other vendors, I find that they all support subsets of
possible configurations. For example, we test the following with each
CPE device which suppor
I haven't done exhaustive testing, but, it has to do with certain combinations
of IPv4 configurations and IPv6 routing do work and other combinations
don't.
Owen
On Jan 26, 2011, at 4:41 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> Could you elaborate? Which circumstances?
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:23 AM,
Could you elaborate? Which circumstances?
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> It works for routing native IPv6 under some circumstances as well.
>
> Owen
>
> On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
>>
>>> What a
It works for routing native IPv6 under some circumstances as well.
Owen
On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
>
>> What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
>>
>> The IPv6 feature seems working, with
Hi,
Maybe a bit more to explain. Up to now I asked the vendors to provide certain
information before adding a box to the matrix. Apple was send a copy but they
never responded. In future we are going to build the matrix upon user supplied
data. See the article on the future of this work at
htt
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a basic IPv6
firewall.
Yes it is. I already reported to Marco.
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/content-ipv6-cp
What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a basic IPv6
firewall.
- Original Message -
From: "Mirjam Kuehne"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
Subject: Future of the I
27 matches
Mail list logo
