My favorite is 12.8tbps Capacityz on the second slide.
On 11/2/2013 3:44 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Yeah. I reported that to them over the Summer... hopefully their cable
laying crew is more attentive to detail. ;-) -Jim P.
--
Jon Sands
John Levine wrote:
I expect we'll hear lots of pontification, quietly fading away when
someone explains to the pontificators just how expensive it would be
to do what they want, and ask where the money is coming from.
For countries other than US, mandating domestic servers prevents
money
This is not 100% true, the economics of hosting and providing layer 7
services are not longer strictly defined by geographic boundaries, also
some local companies (global or not) provide services locally regardless of
the location (or multiple locations) of the servers.
There is no field on the
Jorge Amodio wrote:
There is no field on the IP packet header to indicate to which
political mandate the packet belongs.
If a service provider violates some local regulation, the
provider will be punished, which is the political
mandate.
That is, the service provider should better observe
That is correct (not everywhere) but it has no direct relationship with the
economics plus violating local or international laws is way above layer 7
Also there is no uniform and universal standard that defines what is or is not
a violation.
-Jorge
On Nov 4, 2013, at 7:17 AM, Masataka Ohta
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 8:37 AM
To: Masataka Ohta
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: How anti-NSA backlash could fracture the Internet along
national borders - The Washington Post
That is correct (not everywhere) but it has no direct relationship with the
economics plus violating local
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Eric Tykwinski eric-l...@truenet.com wrote:
Just wanted to add something to the discussion:
http://www.renesys.com/2013/10/google-dns-departs-brazil-ahead-new-law/
Basically, they are claiming possible new laws in Brazil have left Google to
shut down DNS
Casual comment:
This scheme, have a problem.
USA is friend of country A,and country B. A is spying on B, and share the
results with USA. B is spying on A and share the results with USA.
A and B can make a network, but will be all but private.
--
--
ℱin del ℳensaje.
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't be the only one to have been following this 12.8TB of neat-o-ness:
http://www.bricscable.com/
34 000 km, 2 fibre pair, 12.8
In article ee045d19-797d-4346-8793-b854e528f...@email.android.com you write:
The balkanizing of the Net?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/01/how-anti-nsa-backlash-could-fracture-the-internet-along-national-borders/
I expect we'll hear lots of pontification, quietly
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
In article ee045d19-797d-4346-8793-b854e528f...@email.android.com you write:
The balkanizing of the Net?
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
In article ee045d19-797d-4346-8793-b854e528f...@email.android.com you
write:
The balkanizing of the Net?
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
In article ee045d19-797d-4346-8793-b854e528f...@email.android.com you
Saying that advocating for an open and global Internet is a nog part of USG's
cyber-espionage efforts is completely preposterous.
-Jorge
On Nov 2, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
The balkanizing of the Net?
I'm afraid I can't glark 'nog' in that sentence from context...
Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote:
Saying that advocating for an open and global Internet is a nog part of
USG's cyber-espionage efforts is completely preposterous.
-Jorge
On Nov 2, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Jay Ashworth
LOL, I was typing on an iPad and didn't notice, s/nog/big/
Thanks for the catch.
-J
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
I'm afraid I can't glark 'nog' in that sentence from context...
Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote:
Saying that advocating for an
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:12:54PM -0400,
Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote
a message of 8 lines which said:
The balkanizing of the Net?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/01/how-anti-nsa-backlash-could-fracture-the-internet-along-national-borders/
So, to host
I've never seen a byte claiming any nationality, Internet network topology is
not geopolitical (at least a vast percentage of it) and routing policy !=
politics. When now in a cloud world your data may get replicated anywhere,
trying to create islands (which btw are not immune to
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't be the only one to have been following this 12.8TB of neat-o-ness:
http://www.bricscable.com/
34 000 km, 2 fibre pair, 12.8 Tbit/s
so you can get 80 waves on a single pair, 80 100g waves? that's 8tbps
where's
19 matches
Mail list logo
