Re: Level 3 issues?

Was looking at an internal report not long ago. L3 NYC to Miami looked to be in really rough shape. As I was watching, things flipped inside L3 to go NYC->Boston, then handed off to Cogent.  Didn't dig further than that, but methinks they have something going on, yes.   Thanks, Beecher On

Re: Level 3 issues?

Yes; you should subscribe to outa...@outages.org for better reports. (Short summary - yes, no root cause/TTR yet). George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2016, at 12:49 PM, David Hubbard > wrote: > > Anyone seeing issues with Level 3

Re: Level 3 issues?

From: "David Hubbard" <dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 4:18 PM To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Level 3 issues? I just heard from someone there is suspicion that a fiber cut occurred in FL, possibly

Re: Level 3 issues?

I just heard from someone there is suspicion that a fiber cut occurred in FL, possibly Miami area, and it has revealed a capacity issue on the L3 network. Haven’t received official word on that yet, but I know our legacy TWTC connection is nearly as useless as our L3 connection thanks to the

Re: Level 3 issues?

Have been seeing issues since just after 3P. Had to swing my traffic over to another provider. Level3 says issues seen from Costa Rica on up to WDC. Thank you, Jordan Medlen Enterprise Communications Manager Bisk Education (813) 612-6207 On 5/16/16, 3:49 PM, "NANOG

RE: Level 3 issues?

I'm having trouble reaching my Birch connection from Verizon and another Birch site. But no issues from FPL Fibernet which passes through Level3. Regards, Ray Orsini – CEO Orsini IT, LLC – Technology Consultants VOICE DATA  BANDWIDTH  SECURITY  SUPPORT P: 305.967.6756 x1009 E:

Re: Level 3 issues in Miami/West Palm Beach

On 01/13/2015 03:18 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:52:49 -0600, Blair Trosper said: All packets traveling through customer edges and routers in Miami/Daytona seem to be incurring *extraordinary* latency (4+ seconds) all of a sudden. I'm impressed that the routers

Re: Level 3 issues in Miami/West Palm Beach

In this case, it appeared to be a customer's edge router, not a core/backbone router...although those did seem to have rather high latency (400ms and higher in some cases) and high packet loss (about 18-20%). On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Stephen Satchell l...@satchell.net wrote: On

Re: Level 3 issues in Miami/West Palm Beach

On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:52:49 -0600, Blair Trosper said: All packets traveling through customer edges and routers in Miami/Daytona seem to be incurring *extraordinary* latency (4+ seconds) all of a sudden. I'm impressed that the routers have sufficient buffer memory to do that.

Re: Level 3 issues

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 11:21:50AM -0800, Matthew Petach wrote: Given the lurking presence of wannabe press vultures here, I doubt you'll see anything forthcoming from the technical folks about what actually happened. This is not to say that people haven't been informed of the issue, it's

RE: Level 3 issues

, December 28, 2008 3:18 PM To: Alex H. Ryu Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Level 3 issues I have heard this story several times. The train derailment was yesterday in New York unless it has not made it to news.google.com on a search for train derail. Issues did not start until 1030 MST. It seems highly

RE: Level 3 issues

, 2008 12:22 PM Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues marco wrote: From what I heard, it was some some malfunction with a router in Washington D.C. which terminated a 100GB bundle from Paris. It was carring about 50GB at the time of the failure. Not sure why routes within the US would

Re: Level 3 issues

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Murphy, Jay, DOH jay.mur...@state.nm.us wrote: You know, it gets pretty thick through here, when all you people slam on someone, to justify pent up angst or whatever the cause may be. I worked for Level 3 as a NOC engr, and they follow standards as other

Re: Level 3 issues

I think that most of the anger was directed at the wanna-be reporters/journalists that visit this list. Todd Vierling wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Murphy, Jay, DOH jay.mur...@state.nm.us wrote: You know, it gets pretty thick through here, when all you people slam on someone,

RE: Level 3 issues

:20 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues I think that most of the anger was directed at the wanna-be reporters/journalists that visit this list. Todd Vierling wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Murphy, Jay, DOH jay.mur...@state.nm.us wrote: You know, it gets pretty

Re: Level 3 issues

On 12/29/08, marco ma...@zero11.com wrote: I think that most of the anger was directed at the wanna-be reporters/journalists that visit this list. Yes. A nice set of examples of why that anger exists can be found here: http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/search?p=petach+kablooie :( Matt

Re: Level 3 issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yo Matt! On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Matthew Petach wrote: Yes. A nice set of examples of why that anger exists can be found here: http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/search?p=petach+kablooie Well... I sorta liked that story. I did not think you came

RE: Level 3 issues

What country, location, where you fed from?? -Original Message- From: marco [mailto:ma...@zero11.com] Sent: December 28, 2008 12:59 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Level 3 issues is anyone having issues with Level3?

Re: Level 3 issues

http://www.internetpulse.net/ (if you can get to it). Does not look pretty for L3. I can't get to most web sites if I go via Level3 (Cleveland, OH). Ping/traceroute look good though. marco wrote: is anyone having issues with Level3?

Re: Level 3 issues

Yes. We just experienced an outage in Philadelphia. We shut down the circuit pending further investigation. On Dec 28, 2008, at 12:58 PM, marco wrote: is anyone having issues with Level3?

Re: Level 3 issues

jajog...@gmail.com wrote: Yes sir. -Original Message- From: marco [mailto:ma...@zero11.com] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 12:59 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Level 3 issues is anyone having issues with Level3? do you have any more details?

Re: Level 3 issues

marco a écrit : is anyone having issues with Level3? hi, theplanet.com and many websites (cnn.com ; amazon.com ; ... ) have not been accessible from France (Orange, home connection) for about 30 minutes. Don't know if there is a link with your question, but . Pierre-Henri

Re: Level 3 issues

marco a écrit : is anyone having issues with Level3? hi, theplanet.com and many websites (cnn.com ; amazon.com ; ... ) have not been accessible from France (Orange, home connection) for about 30 minutes. Don't know if there is a link with your question, but it's strange... Pierre-Henri

RE: Level 3 issues

: December 28, 2008 1:06 PM To: marco Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues marco a écrit : is anyone having issues with Level3? hi, theplanet.com and many websites (cnn.com ; amazon.com ; ... ) have not been accessible from France (Orange, home connection) for about 30 minutes. Don't know

RE: Level 3 issues

: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:06 AM To: marco Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues marco a écrit : is anyone having issues with Level3? hi, theplanet.com and many websites (cnn.com ; amazon.com ; ... ) have not been accessible from France (Orange, home connection) for about 30 minutes

Re: Level 3 issues

: December 28, 2008 1:06 PM To: marco Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues marco a écrit : is anyone having issues with Level3? hi, theplanet.com and many websites (cnn.com ; amazon.com ; ... ) have not been accessible from France (Orange, home connection) for about 30 minutes

Re: Level 3 issues

[mailto:phac...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:06 AM To: marco Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues marco a écrit : is anyone having issues with Level3? hi, theplanet.com and many websites (cnn.com ; amazon.com ; ... ) have not been accessible from France

Re: Level 3 issues

I'm showing significant latency and loss over my L3 stuff. interetpulse.net showing the same thing too, seems to be a substantial problem. Pierre-Henri wrote: marco a écrit : is anyone having issues with Level3? hi, theplanet.com and many websites (cnn.com ; amazon.com ; ... ) have not

Re: Level 3 issues

until something looks better -Original Message- From: Pierre-Henri [mailto:phac...@gmail.com] Sent: December 28, 2008 1:06 PM To: marco Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues marco a écrit : is anyone having issues with Level3? hi, theplanet.com and many

Re: Level 3 issues

Confirmed here as well. Jon - Original Message - From: Jason Cheslock sangrevie...@gmail.com To: marco ma...@zero11.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 1:35:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: Level 3 issues According to L3, this issue should be fixed

RE: Level 3 issues

Seems to be normalizing here in Colorado as well, however still having occasional packet loss to NY. -Original Message- From: Jon Wolberg [mailto:j...@defenderhosting.com] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:40 AM To: Jason Cheslock Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues

Re: Level 3 issues

occasional packet loss to NY. -Original Message- From: Jon Wolberg [mailto:j...@defenderhosting.com] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:40 AM To: Jason Cheslock Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues Confirmed here as well. Jon - Original Message - From: Jason

RE: Level 3 issues

Any word on the actual cause of the issue? From: Derek Bodner [mailto:subscribedli...@derekbodner.com] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:53 AM To: Blake Pfankuch Cc: Jon Wolberg; Jason Cheslock; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues Looks like most providers here in the east coast

Re: Level 3 issues

Blake Pfankuch wrote: Any word on the actual cause of the issue? From: Derek Bodner [mailto:subscribedli...@derekbodner.com] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:53 AM To: Blake Pfankuch Cc: Jon Wolberg; Jason Cheslock; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues Looks like most providers

Re: Level 3 issues

On 12/28/08, Blake Pfankuch bpfank...@cpgreeley.com wrote: Any word on the actual cause of the issue? Given the lurking presence of wannabe press vultures here, I doubt you'll see anything forthcoming from the technical folks about what actually happened. This is not to say that people haven't

Re: Level 3 issues

marco wrote: From what I heard, it was some some malfunction with a router in Washington D.C. which terminated a 100GB bundle from Paris. It was carring about 50GB at the time of the failure. Not sure why routes within the US would be effected. We connect to level3 in Ashburn/DC and saw

Re: Level 3 issues

We saw our bandwidth drop on our Level3 OC-48 to about half of what we were doing. We had to stop announcing our subnets to Level3 to get traffic to fail over properly throughout the world. We have a ticket open with Level3's NOC but have not received word on what happened or when to expect a

Re: Level 3 issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 IMHO, this is exactly what service providers love to hear in order for them not to be forth coming. regards, /virendra Matthew Petach wrote: On 12/28/08, Blake Pfankuch bpfank...@cpgreeley.com wrote: Any word on the actual cause of the issue?

Re: Level 3 issues

; Jason Cheslock; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues Looks like most providers here in the east coast are routing through level3 again, and I'm not seeing any packet loss or latency anymore. On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch bpfank...@cpgreeley.commailto:bpfank

RE: Level 3 issues

. -Original Message- From: Alex H. Ryu [mailto:r.hyuns...@ieee.org] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 2:44 PM To: Blake Pfankuch Cc: Derek Bodner; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues It seems that there was fiber cut because of train derailment around NY area. Alex Blake Pfankuch

Re: Level 3 issues

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 17:17, Blake Pfankuch bpfank...@cpgreeley.com wrote: It seems highly unlikely that a train derailment yesterday caused major network issues today. Have you ever seen cleanup efforts after a major accident. Cleanup usually involves more backhoes, and other major

Re: Level 3 issues

On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, Jim Popovitch wrote: On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 17:17, Blake Pfankuch bpfank...@cpgreeley.com wrote: It seems highly unlikely that a train derailment yesterday caused major network issues today. Have you ever seen cleanup efforts after a major accident. Cleanup usually

RE: Level(3) Issues

Can you post a couple of IP's ? We're out of Level(3) Detroit node and don't see anything towards Disney.com etc Paul -Original Message- From: James Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 8:01 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Level(3) Issues Is anyone

RE: Level(3) Issues

Gainesville, FL 32611 321-663-0421 Cell -Original Message- From: Paul Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 9:17 AM To: James Baldwin; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Level(3) Issues Can you post a couple of IP's ? We're out of Level(3) Detroit node