On 24/05/10 17:28, Allan Eising wrote:
In some ways, I find the MikroTik RouterOS routing filter syntax a little
more powerful than Cisco's route-maps. As routing filters work the same
way as firewall filters, you can group rules in chains and reuse parts
of your filters in other filters by
* George Bonser:
Well, I believe the original poster said that one of his colleagues
swore that BGP multihoming wouldn't work unless both feeds terminated on
the same router. I suppose said colleague has never heard of iBGP
between two routers of the local AS. Those two routers should
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:i...@xip.at]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 8:56 PM
To: Lorell Hathcock
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Mikrotik BGP Question
Dear Lorell,
We will implement OSPF.
so what arguments speak against 2 bgp upstreams?
Kind regards,
Ingo
* George Bonser:
Does this really work that well? Won't you still get loops or
blackholes unless the eBGP routes on all border routers are identical?
As opposed to what, injecting the entire BGP table into your igp?
As opposed to just injecting defaults.
Maybe there is a reason the legacy
On Sun, 23 May 2010 08:21:47 +0200, Graham Beneke wrote:
On 2010/05/21 11:56 PM, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
- Mikrotik still has some memory leaks in the BGP stack somewhere,
causing funny issues at times.
- Filters aren't adequate for my use, and lacking a lot on IPv4, but
even more on
: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of Learn RouterOS
-Original Message-
From: Allan Eising [mailto:allan.eising+gm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 11:29 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mikrotik BGP Question
On Sun, 23 May 2010 08:21:47 +0200
Dear Lorell,
We will implement OSPF.
so what arguments speak against 2 bgp upstreams?
Kind regards,
Ingo Flaschberger
On 2010-05-23 18:55, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
Dear Lorell,
We will implement OSPF.
so what arguments speak against 2 bgp upstreams?
It's not an either or proposition...
ospf carries your internal routes, ibgp carries you external routes
between internal routers. you can carry default
-Original Message-
From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joe...@bogus.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 10:27 PM
To: Ingo Flaschberger
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mikrotik BGP Question
On 2010-05-23 18:55, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
Dear Lorell,
We will implement OSPF.
so what
[mailto:i...@xip.at]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 6:43 PM
To: Lorell Hathcock
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mikrotik BGP Question
Dear Lorell,
My question is about BGP on the Mikrotik platform. The guy who I am
supplanting swears that we are supposed to be bringing the second internet
link
Dear Lorell,
We are putting a private PTP metro ethernet (fiber based) link between the
two locations. And both locations will have one internet connection.
this network between should be no problem,
what routing protocols do you use in your network? ospf?
Kind regards,
Ingo
Leviton Authorized Installer
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:i...@xip.at]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 6:07 PM
To: Lorell Hathcock
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Mikrotik BGP Question
Dear Lorell,
We are putting a private PTP metro ethernet (fiber based) link between
On 21/05/2010 13:16, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
job just fine. (And he's the same guy that has bridged this whole network,
so it is easy to disbelieve his opinion.)
ew. nasty.
So here's the question. Is there something about running BGP on a Mikrotik
platform that precludes having the
On 05/21/2010 08:23 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
I will refrain from making any smart-ass comments about Mikrotik and BGP,
but no: there is no reason whatever that you can't take your internet feeds
from different locations, so long as you have a good quality interior
network link between those two
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 21/05/2010 13:16, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
each other. Just make sure your boxes have enough RAM to cope with a full
dfz feed.
note that you do NOT have to have a full feed on either location, if
your goal is simply
On Friday 21 May 2010 05:16, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
I am inheriting a WISP network with Mikrotik equipment throughout. One of
my first duties is to make the network multihomed. We have our first
internet connection at one location and our second internet connection will
be delivered at a
On 21/05/10 13:39, Bret Clark wrote:
On 05/21/2010 08:23 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
I will refrain from making any smart-ass comments about Mikrotik and BGP,
but no: there is no reason whatever that you can't take your internet
feeds
from different locations, so long as you have a good quality
Tutorial: Introduction to BGP
http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/abstracts.php?pt=MTQ0MSZuYW5vZzQ3nm=nanog47
Tutorial: BGP 102
http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/abstracts.php?pt=MTUyMiZuYW5vZzQ4nm=nanog48
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:BGP_Case_Studies
On 2010-05-21
Dear Lorell,
My question is about BGP on the Mikrotik platform. The guy who I am
supplanting swears that we are supposed to be bringing the second internet
link to the same place as the first internet link for BGP to work properly.
Obviously that is not true with major brand routers which
19 matches
Mail list logo
