On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 09:45:09PM -0500, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On 10/16/12, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support
records. So we really aren't using it internally.
if the clutch in my car is broken, should i stop using vehicles?
On 18/10/2012, at 7:44 AM, Nicolai nicolai-na...@chocolatine.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:35:11AM +, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten
wrote:
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support
records. So we really aren't using it internally.
I assume you mean
Apologies for the empty reply, mobile typo machine at work :(
On 18/10/2012, at 7:44 AM, Nicolai nicolai-na...@chocolatine.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:35:11AM +, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten
wrote:
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:09:24PM +1100, Jay Mitchell wrote:
On 18/10/2012, at 7:44 AM, Nicolai nicolai-na...@chocolatine.org wrote:
I assume you mean stock djbdns doesn't support ip6, because it does
indeed support records.
Actually, it doesn't, as you so kindly pointed out. It
As an aside, you may want to fix your DNS, as some mail receivers don't
like this:
$ dig -x 72.249.91.101 +short
static.serversandhosting.com.
$ dig a static.serversandhosting.com +short
72.249.3.27
What is really meant to be said is that MTA's which require RFC compliance
won't talk to
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
What is really meant to be said is that MTA's which require RFC compliance
won't talk to you. Running an MTA which requires minimal RFC compliance
(particularly in respect of DNS configuration) eliminates 98% of spam.
In message 83452cbbe5c3c5439212c8a56346b...@mail.dessus.com, Keith Medcalf
writes:
As an aside, you may want to fix your DNS, as some mail receivers don't
like this:
$ dig -x 72.249.91.101 +short
static.serversandhosting.com.
$ dig a static.serversandhosting.com +short
72.249.3.27
In article 2801f5f8-b8e2-4a9f-9a89-02d7783cc...@josephholsten.com you write:
I want to like IPv6. I do. But I'm seriously considering turning off
IPv6 support from our servers.
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support
records. So we really aren't using it internally.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:35:11AM +, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten wrote:
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support
records. So we really aren't using it internally.
I assume you mean stock djbdns doesn't support ip6, because it does
indeed support records.
On 10/16/12, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support
records. So we really aren't using it internally.
if the clutch in my car is broken, should i stop using vehicles?
dump djbdns or get some diehard to tell you how to fix it.
Ah, but
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten wrote:
But today I noticed that we have a lot of traffic to our DNS cache, and
started to investigate. Turns out that every DNS request would start
with one for the record. Ah, no luck. Maybe you forgot the search
domain? Let's retry
Upgrade djbdns to support IPV6? Think there is a patch for it...
-mike
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 16, 2012, at 20:36, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten
jos...@josephholsten.com wrote:
I want to like IPv6. I do. But I'm seriously considering turning off IPv6
support from our servers.
First
On 2012-10-16 21:35, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten wrote:
I want to like IPv6. I do. But I'm seriously considering turning off IPv6
support from our servers.
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support records. So
we really aren't using it internally.
It sounds
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support
records. So we really aren't using it internally.
if the clutch in my car is broken, should i stop using vehicles?
dump djbdns or get some diehard to tell you how to fix it.
randy
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 21:59 -0600, Jima wrote:
FWIW, DJB's public take on IPv6 can be found here:
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/ipv6mess.html .
After a quick read, it seems that that statement completely fails to
consider dual stack as a transition mechanism.
Regards, K.
--
In message 2801f5f8-b8e2-4a9f-9a89-02d7783cc...@josephholsten.com, Joseph Ant
hony Pasquale Holsten writes:
I want to like IPv6. I do. But I'm seriously considering turning off
IPv6 support from our servers.
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support
records. So we
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:35:11 -0700, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten
jos...@josephholsten.com wrote:
I want to like IPv6. I do. But I'm seriously considering turning off
IPv6 support from our servers.
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support
records. So we
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten wrote:
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support
records. So we really aren't using it internally.
Sounds like a self-inflicted wound. You have alternatives.
I'm _this_ close to turning IPv6 off entirely. Anyone
On 17 Oct 2012, at 5:35 AM, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten
jos...@josephholsten.com wrote:
I want to like IPv6. I do. But I'm seriously considering turning off IPv6
support from our servers.
First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support records.
So we really aren't
19 matches
Mail list logo
