>Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 05:52:17 +
>From: Nagarjun Govindraj
>To: "nanog@nanog.org"
>Subject: RPKI coverage statistics
>Message-ID:
>
>Content-Type: text/plain;
On 21/02/2017 08:22, Nagarjun Govindraj via NANOG wrote:
> I am trying to solve the problem of BGP IP prefix hijack detection for the
> AS we own using RPKI system.
> But IP addresses covered under RPKI system is very less under 10%.
> How is community dealing with UNKNOWN state for the prefixes
I am trying to solve the problem of BGP IP prefix hijack detection for the
AS we own using RPKI system.
But IP addresses covered under RPKI system is very less under 10%.
How is community dealing with UNKNOWN state for the prefixes when queried
against RPKI system.
Reply from the community members
Hi Nagarjun,
You can find some statistics on adoption, coverage and quality here:
http://certification-stats.ripe.net
https://lirportal.ripe.net/certification/content/static/statistics/world-roas.html
http://rpki.surfnet.nl
All the best,
Alex Band
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 06:52, Nagarjun
4 matches
Mail list logo