Re: RPKI coverage statistics

2017-03-02 Thread Montgomery, Douglas (Fed)
>Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 05:52:17 + >From: Nagarjun Govindraj >To: "nanog@nanog.org" >Subject: RPKI coverage statistics >Message-ID: > >Content-Type: text/plain;

Re: RPKI coverage statistics

2017-02-20 Thread Hank Nussbacher
On 21/02/2017 08:22, Nagarjun Govindraj via NANOG wrote: > I am trying to solve the problem of BGP IP prefix hijack detection for the > AS we own using RPKI system. > But IP addresses covered under RPKI system is very less under 10%. > How is community dealing with UNKNOWN state for the prefixes

Re: RPKI coverage statistics

2017-02-20 Thread Nagarjun Govindraj via NANOG
I am trying to solve the problem of BGP IP prefix hijack detection for the AS we own using RPKI system. But IP addresses covered under RPKI system is very less under 10%. How is community dealing with UNKNOWN state for the prefixes when queried against RPKI system. Reply from the community members

Re: RPKI coverage statistics

2017-02-20 Thread Alex Band
Hi Nagarjun, You can find some statistics on adoption, coverage and quality here: http://certification-stats.ripe.net https://lirportal.ripe.net/certification/content/static/statistics/world-roas.html http://rpki.surfnet.nl All the best, Alex Band > On 20 Feb 2017, at 06:52, Nagarjun