-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On a related note, another great way to keep track of new ICANN
registry agreements is the gTLD Tech mailing list:
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-tech
...and the gTLD Notification list:
Patrick:
On 3/15/14, 12:42 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
(As if the US has control anyway)
It's all over the popular press, strange I haven't seen it here.
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/200889-us-to-relinquish-internet-control
Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote on 03/15/2014 06:07:33 PM:
From: Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: 03/15/2014 06:09 PM
Subject: Re: US to relinquish control of Internet
On 3/15/2014 7:39 AM, Bob Evans wrote:
Was I being a pollyanna?
Yep, way
* John R. Levine:
Let's hope you're right, but I note that the ITU isn't an
inter-governmental organization,
It was able to obtain a delegation for ITU.INT, so it's
inter-governmental enough in DNS terms.
Let's hope you're right, but I note that the ITU isn't an
inter-governmental organization,
It was able to obtain a delegation for ITU.INT, so it's
inter-governmental enough in DNS terms.
Yes, it was delegated a month before TPC.INT was. Could you clarify
the point you're making?
R's,
John
(As if the US has control anyway)
It's all over the popular press, strange I haven't seen it here.
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/200889-us-to-relinquish-internet-control
On 3/15/2014 7:39 AM, Bob Evans wrote:
It's nice of the DoC to relinquish control, but I really don't see it
changing much other than quieting down some hype from countries that were
saying they were pissed at the US for controlling the Internet. And I
couldn't really see those countries doing
Bob Evans wrote:
(As if the US has control anyway)
It's all over the popular press, strange I haven't seen it here.
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/200889-us-to-relinquish-internet-control
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:17 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
Let's hope you're right, but I note that the ITU isn't an
inter-governmental organization,
It was able to obtain a delegation for ITU.INT, so it's
inter-governmental enough in DNS terms.
Yes, it was delegated a month
The ITU is an agency of the United Nations.Which is an organization
created by treaty, of which various nations' governments are members.
Actually, the ITU is more than twice as old as the UN, and merged with the
UN in 1947. As noted in a previous message, the ITU has both government
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 08:08:47PM -0400, John R. Levine wrote:
The ITU is an agency of the United Nations.Which is an organization
created by treaty, of which various nations' governments are members.
Actually, the ITU is more than twice as old as the UN, and merged with the
UN in
What's the worst they can do at this point? Make .bobtodd and
.bubbagump TLDs? This is different from some of the crap we've got now
in what way??
Well, ICANN has come pretty close to delegating .HOME and .CORP to domain
speculators, despite the vast amount of informal use which would get
What's the worst they can do at this point? Make .bobtodd and
.bubbagump TLDs? This is different from some of the crap we've got now
in what way??
I’m not too worried about what they could do to TLDs… It would be hard to make
a bigger mess than ICANN already has.
On the other hand, I am
Owen DeLong wrote:
What's the worst they can do at this point? Make .bobtodd and
.bubbagump TLDs? This is different from some of the crap we've got now
in what way??
I’m not too worried about what they could do to TLDs… It would be hard to make
a bigger mess than ICANN already has.
On the
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On the other hand, I am very concerned about what they would do to the
numbers side of things..
Just keep their grubby paws off the IETF and the internet standards
process. I doubt there's much reason for concern. IPv4
Was I being a pollyanna?
I look forward to the ITU equitably allocating domain names and IP
addresses.
R's,
John
On Mar 14, 2014, at 9:19 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I look forward to the ITU equitably allocating domain names and IP
addresses.
While it is not possible to know what will happen in the future, we do
have some idea of what _won't_ happen:
From
I look forward to the ITU equitably allocating domain names and IP
addresses.
NTIA will not accept a proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a
government or an inter-governmental organization solution.
Let's hope you're right, but I note that the ITU isn't an
inter-governmental
On Mar 14, 2014, at 11:13 PM, John R. Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
NTIA will not accept a proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a
government or an inter-governmental organization solution.
Let's hope you're right, but I note that the ITU isn't an inter-governmental
organization, it's
On Mar 14, 2014, at 8:13 PM, John R. Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I look forward to the ITU equitably allocating domain names and IP
addresses.
NTIA will not accept a proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a
government or an inter-governmental organization solution.
Let's hope
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
(As if the US has control anyway)
It's all over the popular press, strange I haven't seen it here.
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/200889-us-to-relinquish-internet-control
21 matches
Mail list logo
