Dear Pascal:
Have not heard your follow-up thoughts and comments.
It would be much appreciated if we can carry this dialog forward.
Regards,
Abe (2022-05-05 11:23 EDT)
On 2022-04-21 17:38, Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
Dear Pascal:
0) Thanks for your clarification. It enabled me to study your
Dear Pascal:
0) Thanks for your clarification. It enabled me to study your draft a
little closer and came up with the following observations to share.
1) "Yes, this is plain IP in IP. For a router does not know about
YADA, this looks like the most basic form of tunnel you can get.":
Dear Abe:
Yes, this is plain IP in IP. For a router does not know about YADA, this looks
like the most basic form of tunnel you can get. Which is where the inner/outer
terminology comes from. All very classical. We could do an over-UDP variation
if people want it.
I used a condensed format to
Dear Pascal:
1) I had a quick look at the below updated draft. I presume Figure 2
is intended to address my request. Since each IPv4 address has 4 bytes,
what are the 12 bytes allocated for IPv4 header fields (outer) and
(inner), each? Aren't they the standard first 12 bytes of packet
Dear all
Following advice from thus list, I updated the YADA I-Draft (latest is
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thubert-v6ops-yada-yatt-03.html, more to
come soon if feedback is heard) and proposed it to the v6ops WG at the IETF.
For memory, the main goal here is to find a compromise as
5 matches
Mail list logo
