Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-07 Thread Mark Tinka
On 7/May/18 02:31, Aaron Gould wrote: > I'm not sure what you are taking about with ORR, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-16 Mark.

Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-06 Thread Aaron Gould
I'm not sure what you are taking about with ORR, but I use dual RR's for a redundant cluster with me ASR9k's in IOS XR, and I have them handling routes for ... Family l2vpn VPLS Family vpnv4 Family vpnv6 ...so my 6PE mpls l3vpn has been working fine Aaron > On May 6, 2018, at 7:20 AM, Mark

Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-06 Thread Mark Tinka
On 6/May/18 12:29, Nick Hilliard wrote: >   > one option potentially worth looking at here would be optimal route > reflection.  "Potentially" because vendors haven't been shipping ORR > for long and some implementations are still working themselves through > the design kink stage. So our good

Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-06 Thread Nick Hilliard
Mark Tinka wrote: On 4/May/18 08:01, Erik Sundberg wrote: My questions is how do I get traffic to go directly between the PE's without going to the Core Routers? 1. Can I enable iBGP between the PE's in a full mesh to allow traffic between the PE's without going to the core's. Or does this

RE: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-05 Thread Erik Sundberg
te Reflector Client Design Question On 4/May/18 08:01, Erik Sundberg wrote: My questions is how do I get traffic to go directly between the PE's without going to the Core Routers? 1. Can I enable iBGP between the PE's in a full mesh to allow traffic between the PE's without going to the cor

Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-05 Thread Mark Tinka
On 4/May/18 08:01, Erik Sundberg wrote: > My questions is how do I get traffic to go directly between the PE's without > going to the Core Routers? > > 1. Can I enable iBGP between the PE's in a full mesh to allow traffic between > the PE's without going to the core's. Or does this break the

RE: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-04 Thread Erik Sundberg
y, May 4, 2018 9:16 AM To: Erik Sundberg <esundb...@nitelusa.com> Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question Erik, Before I email my suggestions, can you clarify the followings; Do Core1 and Core2 also provide the function of BDRs peering wit

RE: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-04 Thread Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
You could optimize the packet hop count by making smaller but more rings. For example, make one ring with CORE1, CORE2, PE1, PE2, PE3. And another ring with CORE1, CORE2, PE4, PE5. If you configure "route-reflector-client" on the CORE, and mesh the clients, then you can additionally configure

Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-04 Thread Ahad Aboss
Erik, Before I email my suggestions, can you clarify the followings; Do Core1 and Core2 also provide the function of BDRs peering with your upstream/s? Or Just acting as Core/RRs with 500Mbps of traffic traversing through them? Cheers Ahad On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Erik Sundberg

Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-04 Thread James Bensley
On 4 May 2018 at 07:01, Erik Sundberg wrote: > 1. Can I enable iBGP between the PE's in a full mesh to allow traffic between > the PE's without going to the core's. Or does this break the Route Reflector > model? If I have understood your design correctly then don't use

RE: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-04 Thread michalis.bersimis
.org] On Behalf Of Erik Sundberg Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 9:02 AM To: NANOG Subject: Route Reflector Client Design Question I have a RR Client design question.. CORE1---2x10G---C

Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-04 Thread Ca By
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:03 PM Erik Sundberg wrote: > I have a RR Client design question.. > > > CORE1---2x10G---CORE2 > | > | > | > | > |10G Ring > | > | > | > | >

Re: Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-04 Thread Spyros Kakaroukas
Hey Erik, 1) This messes up the design and introduces unnecessary complexity. As your issue is not directly caused by having a RR topology, I’d avoid doing that. 2) That, IMHO, would be the optimal solution, assuming you don’t have enough internal routes to overflow the TCAM of your PEs in the

Route Reflector Client Design Question

2018-05-04 Thread Erik Sundberg
I have a RR Client design question.. CORE1---2x10G---CORE2 | | | | |