It appears that Lukas Tribus said:
>Yes... point your default coordinates to a safe location, please!
>
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/08/10/lawsuit-how-a-quiet-kansas-home-wound-up-with-600-million-ip-addresses-and-a-world-of-trouble/
>
>https://arstechnica.com/tech-poli
On 10/21/21 06:59, Sean Donelan wrote:
Has anyone published "safe" geo-location defaults? By safe I mean
default lat/lon coordinates for a country, state/province, city, postal
code which do not resolve near a residence.
It seems like too many people use "Find My " or
cipated traffic volume.
> On Oct 21, 2021, at 09:02, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> Has anyone published "safe" geo-location defaults? By safe I mean default
> lat/lon coordinates for a country, state/province, city, postal code which do
> not resolve near a residence.
>
&
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 15:59, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> Has anyone published "safe" geo-location defaults? By safe I mean default
> lat/lon coordinates for a country, state/province, city, postal code which
> do not resolve near a residence.
>
> It seems like too many pe
Has anyone published "safe" geo-location defaults? By safe I mean default
lat/lon coordinates for a country, state/province, city, postal code which
do not resolve near a residence.
It seems like too many people use "Find My " or other geo-location
services, and then go t
5 matches
Mail list logo
