Quoting D'Arcy J.M. Cain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Personally I think that the answer to this problem is to simply reply
automatically to these challenges positively no matter what. Puts the
job of filtering spam back on the first person.
I tend to click on the 'authorize' links i see in any
snip
I too think C-R spam 'prevention' is the lazy-mans approach at filtering
spam. People can easily create their own whitelists based on their
maillogs or mailhistory.
snip
Unfortunately, I feel the majority of the solutions offered cater to the
non-technical. The process of simplifying often
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:37:51 -0500
Michienne Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I too think C-R spam 'prevention' is the lazy-mans approach at filtering
spam. People can easily create their own whitelists based on their
maillogs or mailhistory.
snip
Unfortunately, I feel the majority of
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:44:57 EDT, D'Arcy J.M. Cain said:
I don't have any argument with making the end-user's experience simpler
and easier. I do complain when that simplification is at the expense
of others. It's the difference between software that does some of your
work and software that
On Oct 9, 2008, at 6:37 AM, Michienne Dixon wrote:
snip
I too think C-R spam 'prevention' is the lazy-mans approach at
filtering
spam. People can easily create their own whitelists based on their
maillogs or mailhistory.
snip
Unfortunately, I feel the majority of the solutions offered cater
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:16:22PM -0400, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
To prove that your message was sent by a human and not a computer, please
visit the URL below and type in the alphanumeric text you will see in the
image. You will be asked to do this only once for this recipient.
This
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:21:22 -0400
Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't look to me like phishing (although I can see the
similarities); it looks like yet another severely clueless site engaged
in challenge-response spamming. (C-R has long since been not only
completely
I just received the following:
Your message
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Fwd: cnn.com - Homeland Security seeks cyber
counterattacksystem(Einstein 3.0)
Date: 10/7/2008
has been just received by nanog.org mailserver.
To prove that
I received the same message
Subject : Challenge Response
Received: from mail.tcwireless.us ([67.108.86.20] verified)
Your message
...
has been just received by gmail.com mailserver.
I assumed that this is a phishing scam due to the from / mailserver
mismatch, which I think this confirms.
To: Howard C. Berkowitz
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Some odd harvesting going on?
I received the same message
Subject : Challenge Response
10 matches
Mail list logo
