perhaps HC
PSUs etc
Regards
Paschal Masha | Engineering
Skype ID: paschal.masha
- Original Message -
From: "Nehul Patel"
To: "Mark Tinka via NANOG" , "nanog"
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 10:21:59 AM
Subject: Re: [NANOG] [Mailman List] Strange behavior on the
On 5/6/22 11:26, Saku Ytti wrote:
You are always here. You always need to understand your scale and how
much resources you have available, what is possible and what is not.
Of course, if this was the case with the global Internet, we'd have far
fewer problems making it work well than we
On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 12:17, Mark Tinka wrote:
> We have run into issues with platforms that have shipped with FIB's in favour
> of IPv4 and less for IPv6 and MPLS labels. Shifted around, you could give up
> whatever is left for IPv6 and ACL's to give more to IPv4, but you then end up
>
On 5/6/22 10:09, Saku Ytti wrote:
This seems like a strange position. The device has 16MB+16MB jtree
segments. The first is IP, the second is filters (Broadly).
OP has 16MB of first used.
OP has <5MB of second used.
What if the platform had originally shipped with a different balance
On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 10:59, Mark Tinka wrote:
> These are the reasons why I was saying that while there may be some commands
> to move FIB allocations around, it's a lot of admin. because the DFZ is very
> dynamic, and FIB programming issues due to lack of slots that affect
> different
On 5/5/22 21:50, Nick Olsen wrote:
His instance drove us crazy for a bit. The device would learn a route,
show that it was installed (show routes) but traffic to said prefix
would bounce net unreachable. We even pushed a static just for S's
and that still didn't resolve it. It was a single
l>
>
> Allocate more jtree memory for routing tables and Layer 3 VPNs.
>
> Mark.
> ------
>
> Visit Topic
> <https://community.nanog.org/t/strange-behavior-on-the-juniper-mx240/55213/27>
> to respond.
>
> To uns
On 5/5/22 21:48, Nehul Patel wrote:
ok mark got it currently we are using the following DPCE Cards
DPCE-R-4XGE-XFP
DPCE-R-Q-4XGE-XFP
When we tried using the command set chassis memory-enhanced route on
the current Junos version 10.4 it says the command is not supported
so we will need
day, May 5, 2022 6:40 PM
> *To:* Nick Olsen
> *Cc:* nanog@nanog.org
> *Subject:* Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> Thank you for the feedback on it. Would you please let me know which Juno
> OS version he had installed on the MX Chassis
Nehul,
He was running the 15 code train. I think 15.1R6.7. But don't take that as
fact. I just know it was 15 for sure.
From: Nehul Patel
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 6:40 PM
To: Nick Olsen
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240
s the DFZ grows). Eventually
> your only option will be to filter routes and rely on a default or upgrade.
> --
> *From:* NANOG on behalf of
> Nehul Patel
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 4, 2022 3:56 PM
> *To:* nanog@nanog.org
> *Subject:* Strange behavior on th
r upgrade.
From: NANOG on behalf of Nehul
Patel
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 3:56 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240
Hi NANOG,
We are seeing some strange behavior on our Juniper MX240 Chassis it is randomly
dropping the routes to the certain desti
> for Layer 2 (Ethernet framing + MAC look-up). Someone with a longer memory
> may need to chime in. Mark.
> --
>
> Visit Topic
> <https://community.nanog.org/t/strange-behavior-on-the-juniper-mx240/55213/21>
> to respond.
>
> To unsubscribe fro
On 5/5/22 17:24, Nehul Patel wrote:
Ok Mark thank you for the suggestion we are currently running on the
RE-S-1300 i am trying to check if juniper docs as the list of the DPCE
with the I-Chip but not able to find it yet if you know DPCE model
number let me know for it
If memory serves, I
;>
>> Mark.
>> --
>>
>> Visit Topic
>> <https://community.nanog.org/t/strange-behavior-on-the-juniper-mx240/55213/18>
>> to respond.
>>
>> To unsubscribe from these emails, click here
>> <https://community.nanog.org/email/unsubscribe/47c76e5320108f540dc1dd4ac05e9201c0f68c831c43bb950cbada13f53c33a9>
>> .
>>
>>
>
Ok got it saku we will got with the direct upgrade of it
On Wed, May 4, 2022, 22:34 Saku Ytti wrote:
> Almost always direct upgrade works. If you ask TAC, they will likely
> suggest a formal process and you'll be doing many upgrades, which
> itself isn't actually something that is guaranteed to
On 5/5/22 07:34, Saku Ytti wrote:
And like Jordan said, you are out of resources but can extend them
with the command given, which should give you more run rate. You may
want to look in more detail how long you can keep running DPCE until
you're really out.
Certainly an option, but this
On 5/5/22 05:08, Nehul Patel wrote:
Ok, thank you all for the feedback we are going to start with the
Junos OS upgrade first on it but have to open the ticket with JTAC
since currently on the juniper support website they have the Junos
15.1 is available so not sure we can directly jump
On 5/5/22 04:11, Jordan wrote:
Your line cards (not RE's) are running out of route-storage memory.
As a short-term mitigation, you could try borrowing from segment 1,
normally dedicated to filters,
set chassis memory-enhanced route
but this option may not exist in the version of JunOS
On 5/4/22 21:56, Nehul Patel wrote:
Hi NANOG,
We are seeing some strange behavior on our Juniper MX240 Chassis it is
randomly dropping the routes to the certain destination IP address
getting the following errors on the MX240 Chassis
If Someone has seen these errors before please
ineering
> Skype ID: paschal.masha
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Nehul Patel"
> *To: *"Jordan"
> *Cc: *"nanog"
> *Sent: *Thursday, May 5, 2022 06:08:05 AM
> *Subject: *DMARC ViolationDKIM ViolationRe: Strange behavior on the
>
Almost always direct upgrade works. If you ask TAC, they will likely
suggest a formal process and you'll be doing many upgrades, which
itself isn't actually something that is guaranteed to work (like in
WRL9 case, but that is vmhost RE, not yours).
And like Jordan said, you are out of resources
quot;Jordan"
Cc: "nanog"
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 06:08:05 AM
Subject: DMARC ViolationDKIM ViolationRe: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240
Ok, thank you all for the feedback we are going to start with the Junos OS
upgrade first on it but have to open the ticket with JTAC
Ok, thank you all for the feedback we are going to start with the Junos OS
upgrade first on it but have to open the ticket with JTAC since currently
on the juniper support website they have the Junos 15.1 is available so not
sure we can directly jump from 10.4 to 15.1 maybe we have to do step by
Your line cards (not RE's) are running out of route-storage memory.
As a short-term mitigation, you could try borrowing from segment 1,
normally dedicated to filters,
set chassis memory-enhanced route
but this option may not exist in the version of JunOS you're
running, which as already
- On May 4, 2022, at 6:58 PM, Tony Wicks t...@wicks.co.nz wrote:
Hi,
> Dude, JunOS 10.4 end of support - 06/08/2014. You have an almost 8 years past
> end of Vendor support O/S still in production! No, just no.
Now I'm really interested in the uptime of that box...
Thanks,
Sabri
Dude, JunOS 10.4 end of support - 06/08/2014. You have an almost 8 years past
end of Vendor support O/S still in production! No, just no.
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Nehul Patel
Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2022 9:35 am
To: Paschal Masha
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: Strange behavior on the Juniper
; - Original Message -
> From: "Nehul Patel"
> To: "nanog"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 10:56:14 PM
> Subject: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240
>
>
> Hi NANOG,
>
> We are seeing some strange behavior on our Juniper MX240 Chassis it is
>
> >
> > Hi NANOG,
> >
> > We are seeing some strange behavior on our Juniper MX240 Chassis it is
> randomly dropping the routes to the certain destination IP address getting
> the following errors on the MX240 Chassis
> >
> > If Someone has seen these errors be
> 'show jnh N pool summary'
> 'show jnh N pool usage'
>
> On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 23:31, Nehul Patel wrote:
>
> Hi NANOG,
>
> We are seeing some strange behavior on our Juniper MX240 Chassis it is
> randomly dropping the routes to the certain destination IP address gettin
What JUNOS version are you running?
Regards
Paschal Masha | Engineering
Skype ID: paschal.masha
- Original Message -
From: "Nehul Patel"
To: "nanog"
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 10:56:14 PM
Subject: Strange behavior on the Juniper MX240
Hi NANOG,
We are
gt; >
> > Hi NANOG,
> >
> > We are seeing some strange behavior on our Juniper MX240 Chassis it is
> > randomly dropping the routes to the certain destination IP address getting
> > the following errors on the MX240 Chassis
> >
> > If Someone has seen these
'show route summary'
'start shell pfe network fpcX'
'show jnh N pool summary'
'show jnh N pool usage'
On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 23:31, Nehul Patel wrote:
>
>
> Hi NANOG,
>
> We are seeing some strange behavior on our Juniper MX240 Chassis it is
> randomly dropping the rou
Hi NANOG,
We are seeing some strange behavior on our Juniper MX240 Chassis it is
randomly dropping the routes to the certain destination IP address getting
the following errors on the MX240 Chassis
If Someone has seen these errors before please suggest how to resolve it
May 4 12:42:00 cr01
34 matches
Mail list logo
