Thus spake Mike Hammett (na...@ics-il.net) on Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 05:02:22PM
-0600:
> While attempting to ascertain how big of switch buffers I needed in a 100G
> switch, I rediscovered this article where I first learned about switch
> buffers.
>
>
Threads like this are why I subscribe to this.
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 12:27 AM Saku Ytti wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 01:05, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> > It suggests that 60 meg is what you need at 10G. Is that per interface?
> Would it be linear in that I would need 600 meg at 100G?
>
> Not at
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 01:05, Mike Hammett wrote:
> It suggests that 60 meg is what you need at 10G. Is that per interface? Would
> it be linear in that I would need 600 meg at 100G?
Not at all.
You need to understand WHY buffering is needed, to determine how much
you want to offer buffering.
;Dave Taht"
To: "William Herrin"
Cc: "Mike Hammett" , "NANOG"
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2024 6:02:27 PM
Subject: Re: Sufficient Buffer Sizes
Hoo, boy. This is now such an old debate that I do not know where to
start anymore.
I am of the firm opinion nowa
Hoo, boy. This is now such an old debate that I do not know where to
start anymore.
I am of the firm opinion nowadays that if you are buffering more than
a few ms at these enormous speeds, you are doing it wrong, and
regardless https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.11693 seems to hold as for
highly
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:02 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> While attempting to ascertain how big of switch buffers I needed in a 100G
> switch, I rediscovered this article where I first learned about switch
> buffers.
>
>
While attempting to ascertain how big of switch buffers I needed in a 100G
switch, I rediscovered this article where I first learned about switch buffers.
7 matches
Mail list logo
