RE: (Network Orchestrators evaluation) : tail-f vs Anuta vs UBIqube vs OpenDaylight

Haven't looked at Cisco DNA yet? -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Kasper Adel Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 8:02 PM To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: (Network Orchestrators evaluation) : tail-f vs Anuta vs UBIqube vs OpenDaylig

Re: (Network Orchestrators evaluation) : tail-f vs Anuta vs UBIqube vs OpenDaylight

choose it – not because it was flawed, it just wasn’t what we needed for the project we had in mind). Like ODL it is just for mass configuration and essentially and zero touch provisioning. You need to glue it to the rest of your OSS stack probably via the API. Tail-f - seeing as they were gobb

Re: (Network Orchestrators evaluation) : tail-f vs Anuta vs UBIqube vs OpenDaylight

> On 9 Aug 2017, at 22:01, Kasper Adel wrote: > > We are a group of networking engineers less experience with software) in > the middle of the process of procuring a network automation/orchestration > controller, if that is even a good definition and we are clueless on

(Network Orchestrators evaluation) : tail-f vs Anuta vs UBIqube vs OpenDaylight

Hi, This is not a vendor bashing thread. We are a group of networking engineers less experience with software) in the middle of the process of procuring a network automation/orchestration controller, if that is even a good definition and we are clueless on how to evaluate them. Other than the

Re: Tail-F

Conor, Tail-f will give you a global view of your network configurations, and will keep the local database in sync with the devices. This gives you the ability to search and update config across devices. If you want to see the live status, then you can compile an snmp mib and attach

Tail-F

Is anyone using Tail-f software or know anything similar? We are looking for a solution that is vendor agnostic. Can do simple command like show interface so even non-network techs and CSR's can get basic is the port up or down type stats without having to directly login to the network.

Re: Tail-F

--- colton.co...@gmail.com wrote: From: Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com Can do simple command like show interface so even non-network techs and CSR's can get basic is the port up or down type stats without having to directly login to the network.

Re: Tail-F

: On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote: Is anyone using Tail-f software or know anything similar? We are looking for a solution that is vendor agnostic. Can do simple command like show I've only read of this, but my understanding is the Tail-F product

Re: Tail-F

you need and how much work you want to put into it. Phil On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote: Is anyone using Tail-f software or know anything similar? We are looking

Re: Tail-F

On 11/02/2014 03:56 PM, Colton Conor wrote: Some of the show interface commands are fairly basic, but others like on a DSL port show much more information like sync rate, signal loss, etc. Yes, the information in SNMP is pretty well spread out, because a SNMP get request returns a single

Tail-F NCS? (Or similar network configuration management.)

Looking for real-world experience with Tail-f NCS (or similar network configuration management.) Not looking for rancid, we have a homebrew config collection that works well. Looking for something significantly better than I can write myself. Not looking for sales either, I have people