Re: Topic: Inter-AS BGP Local Preference Matrix

2010-10-31 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:55:06 PDT, "Rettke, Brian" said: > It's obviously something that each of us would need to do individually, but > I'm wondering if there is any way this could become a de facto standard, > or could be a method that the community at large could enforce somehow. Alice's Restau

Re: Topic: Inter-AS BGP Local Preference Matrix

2010-10-29 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: >> 5. All vendors should make an effort to standardize the values/value ranges >> offered with other vendors. >> 6. All vendors should offer a local preference matrix to their customers, >> listing the changes made to a specific AS (e.g. ano

Re: Topic: Inter-AS BGP Local Preference Matrix

2010-10-29 Thread Matthew Petach
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Rettke, Brian wrote: > My company is building a national backbone network, leveraging leased lines > and dark fiber from Tier 1/2/3 providers. What we've found is that when we > buy IP in the major markets, our traffic does not flow deterministically with > AS-P

Topic: Inter-AS BGP Local Preference Matrix

2010-10-29 Thread Rettke, Brian
My company is building a national backbone network, leveraging leased lines and dark fiber from Tier 1/2/3 providers. What we've found is that when we buy IP in the major markets, our traffic does not flow deterministically with AS-Path as the metric. This is because most of the major providers