On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 01:20:33AM +0400, Musa Stephen Honlue wrote:
> Personally I recommend dropping them invalids.
100%
> However, you could set local preferences as follows:
> - Valids routes get the highest local pref
> - unknown routes get a medium local pref
> - Invalids routes get the
Hi Steve,
On 10/28, s...@iu.edu wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We seek input on best practices for implementing RPKI ROV in a transit
> (partial transit) network. The Internet2 network provides partial
> transit for many of the K-12 and higher education institutions in the
> US. Our customer routes
Personally I recommend dropping them invalids.
However, you could set local preferences as follows:
- Valids routes get the highest local pref
- unknown routes get a medium local pref
- Invalids routes get the lowest local pref
In this way, if you have competing routes, the one with the higher
Hello,
On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 21:35, wrote:
> Given that some routes may have mistaken ROAs that resolve to an
> invalid state, is there a standard/best practice for processing exceptions?
There is no point in ROV, unless you are dropping invalid routes.
Not dropping invalid routes is
Greetings,
We seek input on best practices for implementing RPKI ROV in a transit (partial
transit) network. The Internet2 network provides partial transit for many of
the K-12 and higher education institutions in the US. Our customer routes
number just over 6,000. We work with our customers
5 matches
Mail list logo
