On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Murphy, Jay, DOH
wrote:
> In your humble opinion, which transmission method is more efficient, packet
> or cell? ...
> Trying to make a decision on the transport mode for cost, delay, jitter, ROI,
> etcetera.
It really depends on what your applications are.
I'
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:56:11 MST, "Murphy, Jay, DOH" said:
> In your humble opinion, which transmission method is more efficient, packet
> or cell?
In my humble opinion, if you care about actual in-the-field efficiency as
opposed to theoretical or in-the-lab results, I think you'll find that there
On 2009-01-14, at 15:56, Murphy, Jay, DOH wrote:
In your humble opinion, which transmission method is more efficient,
packet or cell?
When you say "transmission method" are you just interested in packet/
cell forwarding, or are you also including the effort involved in
segmentation and re
;
> -Original Message-
> From: Murphy, Jay, DOH [mailto:jay.mur...@state.nm.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:56 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Which is more efficient?
>
>
> All,
>
> In your humble opinion, which transmission method is more effi
better off with a variable length
packet, especially when bandwidth is less in demand than processing power.
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Jay, DOH [mailto:jay.mur...@state.nm.us]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:56 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Which is more
All,
In your humble opinion, which transmission method is more efficient, packet or
cell? Granted a cell is a fixed length packet and an IP packet is variable
lengthwould this necessarily only relate to a specific protocol, namely,
cell in ATM, and IP in Ethernet or other types of domai
6 matches
Mail list logo
