On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 1:57 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/18/22 06:21, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
> >
> > The mean depth of the worlds oceans is around ~3700 meters below MSL
> > which means most service calls involve deploying to the proximate
> > location of the fault, fishing around for a
On 3/18/22 06:21, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
The mean depth of the worlds oceans is around ~3700 meters below MSL
which means most service calls involve deploying to the proximate
location of the fault, fishing around for a while and then carefully
re-laying several kilometers of cable on a
I was reading an article in the Economist about a new fiber route down the
Red Sea from Israel and wondered if there were any branches off of those
lines and where the routers were for them. The route kind of made it look
like it was completely at sea, but it would kind of make sense to leave
On 3/17/22 18:42, Michael Thomas wrote:
I was reading an article in the Economist about a new fiber route down
the Red Sea from Israel and wondered if there were any branches off of
those lines and where the routers were for them. The route kind of
made it look like it was completely at sea,
On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 19:59 -0700, H.Shrikumar wrote:
> Schroedinger Routers .. now that's what I want to see. Deflection
> routing taken to its logical conclusion. But you can never tell if it
> worked or not.
Yes, you can. But you can't see if they are *working*. :-)
Regards, K.
--
t;nanog@nanog.org"
> Subject: RE: are underwater routers a thing?
>
>
>
> it look like it was completely at sea, but it would kind of make sense
> to leave them at sea if you could put a router there.
>
>
>
> First thing that comes to mind is power, how would you power them?
>
Surprisingly it is power that primarily limits repeater count in undersea spans.
Ie, most available power is going to be eaten up budget wise by the repeaters,
leaving none for routers.
It’s not terribly clear that a router would substantially benefit things that a
ROADM could not also
John's probably seen this but I think it addresses power on cables and
branching nodes (which are just optical /roadm devices)
https://youtu.be/H9R4tznCNB0
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022, 22:40 John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Jerry Cloe said:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >it look like it was completely
High voltage DC from landing stations to the underwater amps and submarine
branching units.
jms
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022, 22:46 Karl Auer wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 21:26 -0500, Jerry Cloe wrote:
> > First thing that comes to mind is power, how would you power them?
>
> Hydroelectricity (or
On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 21:26 -0500, Jerry Cloe wrote:
> First thing that comes to mind is power, how would you power them?
Hydroelectricity (or wave energy), *obviously*. Sheesh.
:-)
Regards, K.
--
~~~
Karl Auer
It appears that Jerry Cloe said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>it look like it was completely at sea, but it would kind of make sense
>to leave them at sea if you could put a router there.
>
>First thing that comes to mind is power, how would you power them?
Undersea cables have had power for repeaters since
> On Mar 17, 2022, at 9:26 PM, Jerry Cloe wrote:
>
>
> it look like it was completely at sea, but it would kind of make sense
> to leave them at sea if you could put a router there.
>
> First thing that comes to mind is power, how would you power them?
Undersea cables absolutely carry
it look like it was completely at sea, but it would kind of make sense
to leave them at sea if you could put a router there.
First thing that comes to mind is power, how would you power them?
I was reading an article in the Economist about a new fiber route down
the Red Sea from Israel and wondered if there were any branches off of
those lines and where the routers were for them. The route kind of made
it look like it was completely at sea, but it would kind of make sense
to leave
14 matches
Mail list logo
