Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-02-15 Thread Tony Finch
I like Ben Goldacre's take on stupid email disclaimers: "READ CAREFULLY. By reading this email, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, c

Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-02-13 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:53:19 EST, Dean Anderson said: (One of these days, somebody will find a way to correct things for the benefit of those googling and reading the thread in the list archives in the future, without feeding the trolls) > Robert Bonomi appears to have no valid premise of first s

Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-02-13 Thread Jay Hennigan
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. NOTICE: This communication may co

Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-02-13 Thread Randy Bush
> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence > Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the > CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are > requested to contact the sender and delete the email. you have sent a message to me

Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-02-13 Thread Robert Bonomi
[ getting afield from 'operational' issues, off-list responses recommended ] > From: Barry Shein > Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:43:17 -0500 > Subject: Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > > On February 13, 2010 at 12:12 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu > (valdis.kletni..

Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-02-13 Thread Barry Shein
On February 13, 2010 at 12:12 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu (valdis.kletni...@vt.edu) wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:02:48 +0800, "Wilkinson, Alex" said: > > > IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence > > Organisation > > Have fun trying to enforce that after post

Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-02-13 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:02:48 +0800, "Wilkinson, Alex" said: > IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence > Organisation Have fun trying to enforce that after posting to a public mailing list in North America, with recipients all over the world. Care to cite any relevan

Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-02-12 Thread Brandon Galbraith
Transparent dns rewriter inline on the network On 2/12/10, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: > > 0n Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 06:15:02AM +0800, Randy Bush wrote: > > >i just lost ten minutes debugging what i thought was a server problem > >which turned out to be a dns trapper on the wireless in the c

Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-02-12 Thread John Levine
>Whats a "dns trapper" ? A "transparent" proxy that intercepts DNS requests and provides edited results intended to improve your customer experience, typically defined as returning A records for web servers full of advertisements when you were expecting something else. The unfortunate fact is tha

Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-02-12 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
0n Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 06:15:02AM +0800, Randy Bush wrote: >i just lost ten minutes debugging what i thought was a server problem >which turned out to be a dns trapper on the wireless in the changi sats >lounge. this is not the first time i have been caught by this. Whats a "d