Hi all,
the replication point is a good one, I did not think about that. However, I
still believe that on the road to v6 adoption, databases are far from being
our most pressing roadblock.
Thanks all!
Carlos
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jerry B. Altzman jba...@altzman.comwrote:
Only to
IMHO you should never, ever make your MySQL accesible over the public
Internet, which renders the issue of MySQL not supporting IPv6 correctly
mostly irrelevant. You could even run your MySQL behind your web backend
using RFC1918 space (something I do recommend).
Moreover, if you need direct
Public or not, if someone wants to run IPv6 only, they shouldn't have to
have the v4 stack just for the database. Databases must work on the v6
stack.
On 10/22/2010 10:02 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
IMHO you should never, ever make your MySQL accesible over the public
Internet, which
Hello...
I've been following the recent IPv6 threads with interest. I decided
to test the M in LAMP for IPv6 support (Although it was really a FreeBSD
server not Linux). It seems than only newer versions (5.5 rc) of MySQL
support IPv6 network connections. Worse is that although it will
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:53:49PM -0700, Christopher McCrory wrote:
Network operations content:
Will We're running MySQL and Postgress servers that do not support
IPv6 be a valid reason for rejecting IPv6 addresses from ISPs or
hosting providers?
First, it's not like the flag day
On 10/21/2010 3:53 PM, Christopher McCrory wrote:
Network operations content:
Will We're running MySQL and Postgress servers that do not support
IPv6 be a valid reason for rejecting IPv6 addresses from ISPs or
hosting providers?
Why not have v4 and v6? There's never a reason to reject v6,
In a message written on Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:53:49PM -0700, Christopher
McCrory wrote:
open to the world. After a few google searches, it seems that
PostgreSQL is in a similar situation.
I don't know when PostgreSQL first supported IPv6, but it works just
fine. I just fired up a stock
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Dan White dwh...@olp.net wrote:
On 21/10/10 14:43 -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:53:49PM -0700, Christopher
McCrory wrote:
open to the world. After a few google searches, it seems that
PostgreSQL is in a similar
On 10/21/10 2:59 PM, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Dan White dwh...@olp.net wrote:
On 21/10/10 14:43 -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:53:49PM -0700, Christopher
McCrory wrote:
open to the world. After a few google
9 matches
Mail list logo
