- Original Message -
> From: "Bill Woodcock"
> Are all y’all allergic to Wikipedia or something?
Lots of people seem to be... :-}
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_recursive_name_server
I find it interesting that that article mentions alt-roots, but doesn't
have a column for
$ whois AS16589
No match found for a 16589.
* li...@benappy.com (Michel 'ic' Luczak) [Tue 02 Feb 2021, 14:48 CET]:
whois -r AS16589 # perhaps?
aut-num:AS16589
as-name:ELV-ANYCAST-NET
You skipped the most important line:
source: RIPE-NONAUTH
In other words, this
>
> $ whois AS16589
> No match found for a 16589.
>
whois -r AS16589 # perhaps?
aut-num:AS16589
as-name:ELV-ANYCAST-NET
Curious! (wkipedia random page look):
Comodo -> 8.26.56.26 && 8.20.247.20
as-path for those both:
174 23393 23393 16589
6762 3257 23393 23393 16589
$ whois AS16589
No match found for a 16589.
(https://bgp.he.net/AS16589#_whois)
So, sending your DNS queries into what sure looks like hijacked
Oh, Bill. If you’d use Wikipedia to check out Wikipedia, you’d be allergic too!
:)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source
-mel
On Feb 1, 2021, at 3:32 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Are all y’all allergic to Wikipedia or something?
> On Feb 1, 2021, at 5:26 PM, Kevin McCormick wrote:
>
> Nearly all of those seem to error out.
>
> Is that a wishful thinking list?
Those that do answer to anyone who asks are flagged "recursion-yes,” but I
don’t know how often it’s updated.
—Chris
Are all y’all allergic to Wikipedia or something?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_recursive_name_server
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Nearly all of those seem to error out.
Is that a wishful thinking list?
Thank you,
Kevin McCormick
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Chris
Boyd
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 4:17 PM
To: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: public open resolver list
> On Feb 1, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> Randy Bush wrote on 01/02/2021 18:16:
>> is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
>> etc.?
>
> https://public-dns.info/
There’s also a list of interesting resolvers at
On 10:49 01/02, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
> >> etc.?
> >
> > https://public-dns.info/
>
> interesting, but probably too broad.
>
> but i suspect my question was too broad.
>
> >> we have a measurement set which contains
>> is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
>> etc.?
>
> https://public-dns.info/
interesting, but probably too broad.
but i suspect my question was too broad.
>> we have a measurement set which contains resolvers, some of which we
>> suspect are intentionally
open resolver list?
CAUTION: This email originated from an external source. Verify the sender
before taking any actions.
Randy Bush wrote on 01/02/2021 18:16:
> is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
> etc.?
https://public-dns.info/
?
Nick
Randy Bush wrote on 01/02/2021 18:16:
is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
etc.?
https://public-dns.info/
?
Nick
is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
etc.?
we have a measurement set which contains a list of resolvers, some of
which we suspect are intentionally open, some unintentionally open,
and some not open. we are trying to filter that first set, the
intentionally open.
14 matches
Mail list logo
