Guys,
on recent days I've seen an UDP attack a couple of times. The attack is fairly
simple, a full
load of UDP packets filled with X. The attacks comes from various sites from
the other side
of the pond (46.165.197.xx, 213.152.180.yy).
Has anyone seen this kind of attack? Basically, the
On Sep 27, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Miguel Mata wrote:
Guys,
on recent days I've seen an UDP attack a couple of times. The attack is
fairly simple, a full
load of UDP packets filled with X. The attacks comes from various sites
from the other side
of the pond (46.165.197.xx,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:55:58AM -0600,
Miguel Mata mm...@intercom.com.sv wrote
a message of 30 lines which said:
Guys,
No gals on NANOG?
The attacks comes from various sites from the other side of the pond
(46.165.197.xx, 213.152.180.yy).
How can you be sure? With UDP, you have zero
On Sep 27, 2012, at 11:34 , Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:55:58AM -0600, Miguel Mata mm...@intercom.com.sv
wrote
a message of 30 lines which said:
Guys,
No gals on NANOG?
Many. Although in fairness, some people use guys in a gender-neutral
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:12:50PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Sep 27, 2012, at 11:34 , Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:55:58AM -0600, Miguel Mata
mm...@intercom.com.sv wrote
No gals on NANOG?
Many. Although in fairness, some people use
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:12:50PM -0400,
Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote
a message of 32 lines which said:
I do not know of any name servers that reply to queries with UDP
packets filled with only the letter X. The DNS Headers alone
require more than the letter X.
Yes, you're
On Sep 27, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Sep 27, 2012, at 11:34 , Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:55:58AM -0600, Miguel Mata
mm...@intercom.com.sv wrote
a message of 30 lines which said:
Guys,
No gals on
7 matches
Mail list logo