I believe there is no Federal requirement that there be a Provider of Last
Resort (POLR). State law might require it, but in at least some states
there is possible to have areas without a POLR. At the national level the
regulatory theory is that when there is sufficient competition in a market,
On 4/10/19 1:55 PM, Jeff Shultz wrote:
It seems like_someone_ has to be the CLEC and "Carrier of Last
Resort" for the area. Not that that means you are going to get the
service you want.
Where I live, you can get AT POTS from the ILEC of record. Sometimes
it even works...when their cross
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 7:43 PM david raistrick wrote:
>
> folks,
>
> I've been away from nanog for a long time - and away from the ISP world for
> longer.
>
> Looking at a house in a new area, at copper splice box out front, bellsouth
> fiber markers as well (yes, that's usually just passing
t;
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 2:28:05 PM
Subject: Re: residential/smb internet access in 2019 - help?
On 3/27/19 7:50 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> https://broadbandnow.com/Florida/Micanopy?zip=32667#
>
> You might want to try neighboring ZIP codes to see what other fixed
> wirel
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 2:05 PM Bryan Fields wrote:
> Looking at the typical equipment used (64 QAM, 20 MHz channel), you're going
> to have a raw bitrate of around 80 mbit/s. Couple this with overhead and some
> inevitable interference and an access point will have about 50 mbit's of large
>
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:18:02 -0400, Bradley Burch said:
> Wisp here.
>
> Our subscribers can get 100mbps bi directional.
>
> But we also know what we are doing.
And being honest here - what percent of WISP operators out there are in your
category, as opposed to the under-capitalized and RF
Wisp here.
Our subscribers can get 100mbps bi directional.
But we also know what we are doing.
Technology is getting better, so speeds are getting better.
> On Mar 27, 2019, at 4:04 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
>
>> On 3/27/19 3:30 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
>> You are way out of line, and grouping
> and CBRS is eclipsing these licensed operators shortly.
Yeah what about that?
https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/google-courts-wisps-tailored-cbrs-solutions
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
On 3/27/19 3:30 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
> You are way out of line, and grouping a whole industry into your experience
> with (probably) one hack
I don't think I'm out of line, I'm relating what I've seen time and time
again. Most WISP's are poorly capitalized and have to run extremely lean.
Most
You are way out of line, and grouping a whole industry into your experience
with (probably) one hack
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:28 PM Bryan Fields wrote:
> On 3/27/19 7:50 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > https://broadbandnow.com/Florida/Micanopy?zip=32667#
> >
> > You might want to try neighboring
On 3/27/19 7:50 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> https://broadbandnow.com/Florida/Micanopy?zip=32667#
>
> You might want to try neighboring ZIP codes to see what other fixed
> wireless providers might be convinced to expand.
>
> http://svic.net/wireless-broadband-north-florida/
You really want to
-
From: "david raistrick"
To: "NANOG List"
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:41:30 PM
Subject: residential/smb internet access in 2019 - help?
folks,
I've been away from nanog for a long time - and away from the ISP world for
longer.
Looking at a house in a
>
> Agreedthis is why monopolies are bad and municipal fiber is good.
>
It's not like municipal fiber has some magic spell to make last mile
affordable though. On OP's instance he would run into the same issue and
would be paying that five figure amount to bring FTTP. Municipal fiber is
only
Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "david raistrick"
To: "NANOG List"
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:41:30 PM
Subject: residential/smb internet access in 2019 - help?
folks,
I've been away from nanog for a long time - and awa
On 3/26/19 10:41 PM, david raistrick wrote:
> Looking at a house in a new area, at copper splice box out front,
> bellsouth fiber markers as well (yes, that's usually just passing by. but
> it's there). Owners since '82 said the telephone company was AT - but
> the New AT apparently no longer
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 12:30 AM Mike Bolitho wrote:
> Agreedthis is why monopolies are bad and municipal fiber is good.
>>
>
> It's not like municipal fiber has some magic spell to make last mile
> affordable though. On OP's instance he would run into the same issue and
> would be paying that
Is there any chance LEO operators like OneWeb etc will make a difference on
this front, and, if so, when?
joly
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:57 PM Ross Tajvar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 11:34 PM david raistrick
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:29 PM Ross Tajvar wrote:
>>
>>
>>> But
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 11:34 PM david raistrick wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:29 PM Ross Tajvar wrote:
>
>
>> But most likely you're just out of luck.
>>
>
> it's really amazing that this is still the case, with our effectively
> internet based economy now.
>
>
Agreedthis is why
term on
top of an already four figure MRC. 50Mbps service in the end.
Probably not worth it for most.
Ray
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Ross Tajvar
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 8:29 PM
To: david raistrick
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: residential/smb internet access
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:29 PM Ross Tajvar wrote:
> But most likely you're just out of luck.
>
it's really amazing that this is still the case, with our effectively
internet based economy now.
This is a common problem with no good solution. Fiber buildouts are almost
always insanely expensive. If you can get one at a more reasonable cost, or
more likely if you can sign a contract of a sufficient length to convince
the carrier to subsidize it, you may be able to get good service that
folks,
I've been away from nanog for a long time - and away from the ISP world for
longer.
Looking at a house in a new area, at copper splice box out front,
bellsouth fiber markers as well (yes, that's usually just passing by. but
it's there). Owners since '82 said the telephone company was AT
22 matches
Mail list logo
