The older school of thought was to put all of the edge interfaces into the
IGP, and then carry all of the external routes in BGP.
I thought people where doing it because IGP converged faster than iBGP and
in case of an external link failure the ingress PE was informed via IGP that
it has to find
In a message written on Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:32:52AM +0200, Adam Vitkovsky
wrote:
I thought people where doing it because IGP converged faster than iBGP and
in case of an external link failure the ingress PE was informed via IGP that
it has to find an alternate next-hop.
Though now with
oops! i have a host directly on the linx on which i can give you
shell access
3, 2013 7:20:44 PM
Subject: Re: route for linx.net in Level3?
I noticed it too this morning from a AS3549 customer. Level 3 LG shows
no route for 195.66.232.0/22 on North American sites.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:52 PM, John Kemp
k...@network-services.uoregon.edu wrote:
Having trouble
In a message written on Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:57:11PM -0400, Jay Ashworth
wrote:
Yes. In the fallout from the Cloudflare attack of last week it was
announced that several IXs were going to stop advertising the
address space of their peering lan, which properly does not need to
be
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
But hey, this is a good thing because a DDOS caused issues, right?
Well, not so much. Even if the exchange does not advertise the
exchange LAN, it's probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at
least IBGP) of everyone
Leo Bicknell wrote:
Even if the exchange does not advertise the
exchange LAN, it's probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at
least IBGP) of everyone connected to it, and by extension all of
their customers with a default route pointed at them.
Actually, that may not be the case, and
On 2013-04-04, at 15:53, Brian Dickson brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com wrote:
Leo Bicknell wrote:
Even if the exchange does not advertise the
exchange LAN, it's probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at
least IBGP) of everyone connected to it,
I have experience of several networks
it and have a free transit.
Check out: http://www.bcp38.info
adam
-Original Message-
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 9:29 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: route for linx.net in Level3?
In a message written on Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:57:11PM -0400
Even if the exchange does not advertise the exchange LAN, it's
probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at least IBGP) of
everyone connected to it,
yikes! this is quite ill-advised and i don't know anyone who does
this, but i think all my competitors should.
I have experience of several
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk wrote:
Check out: http://www.bcp38.info
Right on. :-)
- ferg
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
Yeah, you wouldn't think that one should fall out.
It is possible that my 195.66.241.146 really should
be something sitting within: 195.66.232.0/22.
I'll have to talk with some of the LINX folks to
understand whether they are intending that 195.66.240.0/22
and 195.66.232.0/22 are treated
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Even if the exchange does not advertise the exchange LAN, it's
probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at least IBGP) of
everyone connected to it,
yikes! this is quite ill-advised and i don't know anyone who does
this, but
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Even if the exchange does not advertise the exchange LAN, it's
probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at least IBGP) of
everyone connected to it,
yikes! this is quite ill-advised and i don't know anyone who does
this, but
In a message written on Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 10:01:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
it's putting such things in one's igp that disgusts me. as joe said,
igp is just for the loopbacks and other interfaces it takes to make your
ibgp work.
While your method is correct for probably 80-90% of the ISP
Having trouble reaching route-views.linx.routeviews.org from AS3582.
I'm assuming that some folks stopped carrying
this particular linx.net address prefix
as of this morning. ?!?
$ whois -h whois.cymru.com -v 195.66.241.146
AS | IP | BGP Prefix | CC | Registry |
Hi John,
On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:52 AM, John Kemp k...@network-services.uoregon.edu
wrote:
Having trouble reaching route-views.linx.routeviews.org from AS3582.
I'm assuming that some folks stopped carrying
this particular linx.net address prefix
as of this morning. ?!?
Indeed LINX has
I noticed it too this morning from a AS3549 customer. Level 3 LG shows
no route for 195.66.232.0/22 on North American sites.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:52 PM, John Kemp
k...@network-services.uoregon.edu wrote:
Having trouble reaching route-views.linx.routeviews.org from AS3582.
I'm assuming
18 matches
Mail list logo
