On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:56:09 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola wrote:
>I'm not sure I follow. Many of these aliens are in fact registered in
>RADB, so AFAICS, there that is no reason for them to be registered in
>RIPE DB.
>
>On the other hand, some want to register them in RIPE DB because some
>opera
> I'm not sure I follow. Many of these aliens are in fact registered in
> RADB, so AFAICS, there that is no reason for them to be registered in
> RIPE DB.
when ripe will not mirror the irr segment in which they do register.
randy
> I'm not sure I follow.
I agreed with you.
> Many of these aliens are in fact registered in
> RADB, so AFAICS, there that is no reason for them to be registered in
> RIPE DB.
>
> On the other hand, some want to register them in RIPE DB because some
> operators just want to use RIPE DB e.g. f
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Yes, RIPE rock. Please make it all not suck.
Unfortunately, RIPE DB will allow anyone to add any route objects for
prefixes that are not under the RIPE management :-(. For example,
anyone could add route objects for most of DNS root server prefixe
> > Yes, RIPE rock. Please make it all not suck.
>
> Unfortunately, RIPE DB will allow anyone to add any route objects for
> prefixes that are not under the RIPE management :-(. For example,
> anyone could add route objects for most of DNS root server prefixes.
Little details get used to avoid
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Herein is the value, the RIR (RIPE) is also the holder of the policy.
With ARIN, this is not the case, there is RADB and a number of other RR's
that are out there for varying reasons, some personal and some business.
Yes, RIPE rock. Please
Hi,
On Aug 14, 2008, at 6:38 AM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/08/experts-accuse.html
"The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority -- which coordinates the
internet -- has been prototyping a system to sign the root-zone file
for the last year, but they can't do th
> > My thoughts on the prefix filtering issue would be that we need some kind
> > of system that works along the same principles as DNSSEC and SPF, ie a
> > holder of IP space can publish that they would like everybody to filter
> > in a certain way for announcements for that perticular prefix,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:03:28AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>> How do we hinder this in the short term? I know there are a lot of long
>> term solutions that very few is implementing, but would the fact that
>> these mistakes are brought
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
How do we hinder this in the short term? I know there are a lot of long
term solutions that very few is implementing, but would the fact that
these mistakes are brought up into the (lime)light by a public shaming
list make ISPs shape up and perfor
10 matches
Mail list logo
