Re: network name 101100010100110.net

2010-10-17 Thread Per Carlson
Technically, no. But you probably fancy annoying people. I wouldn't imaging anyone typing that right on the first attempt. On 17 Oct 2010 06:47, Day Domes daydo...@gmail.com wrote: I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data network. I am thinking of using

Re: network name 101100010100110.net

2010-10-17 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 08:07:41AM +0200, Per Carlson wrote: On 17 Oct 2010 06:47, Day Domes daydo...@gmail.com wrote: I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data network. I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see any issues with this?

Re: network name 101100010100110.net

2010-10-17 Thread Joe Hamelin
Matthew said: And imagine answering the phones... Bender's Big Score. Is this for Jewish Hospital (AS 22694)? And many years ago I had jh.org, but domains were $70 back then and my wife thought I had too many... -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474

Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption

2010-10-17 Thread Owen DeLong
On Oct 16, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Franck Martin wrote: You give a /64 to the end users (home/soho), and /48 to multi homed organization (or bigger orgs that use more than one network internally) and get a /32 if you are an ISP. Please DON'T do that. End users (home/soho) should get at least a

Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 (IPv6 STANDARDS)

2010-10-17 Thread Owen DeLong
On Oct 16, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote: On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote: Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:40:41 +1030 From: Mark Smith na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:31:22 +0100 Randy Bush

Re: 12 years ago today...

2010-10-17 Thread Dan White
On 16/10/10 09:09 -0700, Rodney Joffe wrote: I'm not sure about a documentary, but a group of us are working on identifying all the different independent archives that have records from the early years with the idea of creating a Smithsonian/national archive collection at some point. We'll

Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6

2010-10-17 Thread Warren Kumari
On Oct 16, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:56:28 +0100 From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt Drafts are drafts, and nothing more, aren't they? must be some blowhard i have plonked

Re: network name 101100010100110.net

2010-10-17 Thread James Hess
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Day Domes daydo...@gmail.com wrote: I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data network.  I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see any issues with this? The domain-name starts with a digit, which is not really

Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6

2010-10-17 Thread Kevin Oberman
From: Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:07:53 -0400 On Oct 16, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:56:28 +0100 From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt Drafts are

Re: network name 101100010100110.net

2010-10-17 Thread Steve Atkins
On Oct 17, 2010, at 7:16 PM, James Hess wrote: On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Day Domes daydo...@gmail.com wrote: I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data network. I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see any issues with this? The

Re: network name 101100010100110.net

2010-10-17 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 20101018024021.gc8...@vacation.karoshi.com., bmann...@vacation.kar oshi.com writes: On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 09:16:04PM -0500, James Hess wrote: On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Day Domes daydo...@gmail.com wrote: I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit

Re: network name 101100010100110.net

2010-10-17 Thread Joe Hamelin
That's why 3M registered mmm.com back in 1988. -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474 On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message 20101018024021.gc8...@vacation.karoshi.com., bmann...@vacation.kar oshi.com writes: On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at

36/8 and 42/8 allocated to APNIC

2010-10-17 Thread Leo Vegoda
Hi, The IANA IPv4 registry has been updated to reflect the allocation of two /8 IPv4 blocks to APNIC in October 2010: 36/8 and 42/8. You can find the IANA IPv4 registry at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml

Re: Enterprise DNS providers

2010-10-17 Thread Jonas Bj�rklund
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Ken Gilmour wrote: Hello any weekend workers :) We are looking at urgently deploying an outsourced DNS provider for a critical domain which is currently unavailable but are having some difficulty. I've tried contacting UltraDNS who only allow customers from US / Canada to

Re: Enterprise DNS providers

2010-10-17 Thread Jeffrey Lyon
We're using Afilias now, we had nothing short of a horrendous experience dealing with Neustar / UltraDNS and their uninformed, blood hungry sales team. Best regards, Jeff On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Jonas Björklund jo...@bjorklund.cn wrote: On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Ken Gilmour wrote: Hello