* Tony Hain
So take the relays out of the path by putting up a 6to4 router and a
2002:: prefix address on the content servers. Longest match will
cause 6to4 connected systems to prefer that prefix while native
connected systems will prefer the current prefix. The resulting IPv4
path will be
On 11 mei 2011, at 2:39, Karl Auer wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:19 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
For the record Apple's current iChat (the OS (10.6.7) is completely
up to date) fails such a test. It will try IPv6 and not fallback
to IPv4. End users shouldn't be seeing these sorts of errors.
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Frank Bulk wrote:
:: If I can anticipate Igor's response, he'll say that he'll whitelist those
:: IPv6-only networks and so he's just help 182,000 people.
That's a very good guess as to what I was going to say :)
-igor
:: -Original Message-
:: From: Owen DeLong
Luis Marta wrote on 2011-05-10:
In the EU you have Directive 2006/24/EC: http://eur-
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:105:0054:0063:EN:PDF
Article 6 - Periods of retention
Member States shall ensure that the categories of data specified in Article
5 are retained for
In article 5f713bd4b694ac42a8bb61aa6001a...@mail.dessus.com, Keith
Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com writes
Article 5 - Categories of data to be retained
1. Member States shall ensure that the following categories of data are
retained under this Directive:
(a) data necessary to trace and identify the
I wonder how things go if you challenge them in court. This is surely a
topic for another list, but it seems to me it'd be fairly difficult to
prove unless they downloaded part of the movie from your IP and verified
that what they got really was a part of the movie.
I have the netflow
In message 03c70cde-8169-437b-8394-26f839413...@muada.com, Iljitsch van Beijn
um writes:
On 11 mei 2011, at 2:39, Karl Auer wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:19 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
For the record Apple's current iChat (the OS (10.6.7) is completely
up to date) fails such a test. It
Hello,
This is sort of off-topic, but no where near as much as half of the
topics on NANOG. It is relevant to netops for anyone who has a
presence in Japan. Does anyone on NANOG have firsthand in-depth
knowledge of the electrical system in Japan? I know voltage varies
from town to town and
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:56:56AM +0800, Ong Beng Hui said:
while, I am not a lawyer, so what after they know who is using that
broadband connection for that IP. So, they have identified the 80yr old,
what next ? and what if i have a free-for-all wireless router in my
house which
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Michael Holstein
michael.holst...@csuohio.edu wrote:
I wonder how things go if you challenge them in court. This is surely a
topic for another list, but it seems to me it'd be fairly difficult to
prove unless they downloaded part of the movie from your IP and
Jeremy Kister wrote:
Does anyone know of a competent .io registrar who charges in the =
$75/yr area ?
I've been using tierra.net (domaindiscover.com) but they continually
break my domains.
this year, although their website says my domain expires 4/2012, my
domain stopped working today.
On 11 mei 2011, at 16:39, William Astle wrote:
I think the above two points illustrate precisely why so many networks
in North America simply cannot deploy IPv6 whether they want to or not.
We simply cannot obtain IPv6 transit from our upstreams. It's just not
available. And the old line
On 2011-May-11 16:39, William Astle wrote:
[..]
I think the above two points illustrate precisely why so many networks
in North America simply cannot deploy IPv6 whether they want to or not.
We simply cannot obtain IPv6 transit from our upstreams. It's just not
available. And the old line
(it's one in a billion to crack it! beyond a
reasonable doubt! we dont have anyone anywhere in our IT who could possibly
crack it!)
A billion iterations takes what fraction of a second using a high-end
multi-card gamer rig and CUDA? (or for the cheap/lazy, a S3/Tesla instance).
Even for
On 05/11/2011 09:50 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 11 mei 2011, at 16:39, William Astle wrote:
I think the above two points illustrate precisely why so many networks
in North America simply cannot deploy IPv6 whether they want to or not.
We simply cannot obtain IPv6 transit from our
I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1 companies
that should have already been full deployed. These are also some of the more
expensive providers on a per Mb basis. The one provider that was full IPv6
ready was Cogent. HE is also IPv6 (although we don't use them
On 5/11/2011 11:03 AM, ja...@jamesstewartsmith.com wrote:
I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1
companies that should have already been full deployed. These are also some
of the more expensive providers on a per Mb basis. The one provider that was
full IPv6
On May 10, 2011, at 8:30 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote:
On 5/10/11 9:07 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
A good reason why every ISP should have a published civil subpoena
compliance fee.
23,000 * $150 each should only cost them
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:16 AM, William Allen Simpson
william.allen.simp...@gmail.com wrote:
Courts like precedent. I choose Facebook's precedent. Seems reasonable to
me.
That's also roughly in line with Nextel and others for CALEA.
Hrm, I had thought that CALEA specifically removed the
On 2011-05-11 09:10, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 5/11/2011 11:03 AM, ja...@jamesstewartsmith.com wrote:
I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1
companies that should have already been full deployed. These are also some
of the more expensive providers on a per Mb
On 5/11/11 11:19 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On May 10, 2011, at 8:30 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Mark Radabaughm...@amplex.net wrote:
On 5/10/11 9:07 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
A good reason why every ISP should have a published civil subpoena
compliance fee.
Apparently the need for IPv6 isn't yet high enough to consider adding
a
transit provider. I've seen enough press releases from NTT and HE to
know there's at least two that can do this out there.
I believe the major holdup at this point is lack of v6 eyeballs. End
user CPE, particularly
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 10:08:00 AM Robert Boyle wrote:
I know voltage varies
from town to town and prefecture to prefecture. It seems most is
90V-110V.
Also, part of the country is 50Hz and part is 60Hz.
On 11 mei 2011, at 19:01, George Bonser wrote:
A couple of things you can do to check. First of all look for requests
to your DNS servers for records and note where those are coming
from.
Firefox has for a long time done both A and lookups even if the system
doesn't have IPv6. I
On May 11, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 11 mei 2011, at 19:01, George Bonser wrote:
A couple of things you can do to check. First of all look for requests
to your DNS servers for records and note where those are coming
from.
Firefox has for a long time done
* Iljitsch van Beijnum
Firefox has for a long time done both A and lookups even if the
system doesn't have IPv6.
They fixed that in version 4.0, by calling getaddrinfo() with the
AI_ADDRCONFIG flag (like most other browsers do).
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=614526
--
Now you're counting DNS servers. Because the provisioning of IPv6 DNS
addresses has been such a mess and still is problematic, many dual
stack systems do this over IPv4. And the DNS servers they talk to may
be IPv4-only, or IPv4-only users may talk to dual stack DNS servers.
Which is why I
On 11 mei 2011, at 19:32, George Bonser wrote:
If the results of world IPv6 day are as we expect and only 0.1 - 0.2 %
or less of all people have problems, I think the best way forward would
be to have a second world IPv6 day where we again enable IPv6 industry-
wide but this time we don't
On May 11, 2011 10:09 AM, Robert Boyle rob...@tellurian.com wrote:
Hello,
I know voltage varies from town to town and prefecture to prefecture.
No, it doesn't. Japan has two systems, both 100v, western Japan has 60Hz,
eastern Japan has 50Hz.
On Wed, 11 May 2011 10:32:54 PDT, George Bonser said:
0.1% of users is a HUGE number if you have 1,000,000 subscribers. Are
you prepared to field 1,000 helpdesk calls or lose 1,000 customers? Now
imagine 100,000,000 subscribers. Are you ready for 10,000 support calls
or the loss of 10,000
Folks,
At NANOG 43, Jay Adelson had a video clip in his presentation which celebrated
the hilarity that customers create for network engineers. Does anyone have a
link to the video? A review of the abstract
(http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog43/abstracts.php?pt=NDMmbmFub2c0Mw==nm=nanog43)
and
On 5/11/11 8:26 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:16 AM, William Allen Simpson
william.allen.simp...@gmail.com wrote:
Courts like precedent. I choose Facebook's precedent. Seems reasonable to
me.
That's also roughly in line with Nextel and others for CALEA.
Hrm, I
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Robert Boyle rob...@tellurian.com wrote:
Does anyone on NANOG have firsthand in-depth knowledge of the electrical
system in Japan?
I do not. However:
http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2225.html
The voltage in Japan is 100 Volt
The frequency of electric current is
On 05/11/2011 11:21, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Unless you have a captive audience for customers, you probably have a churn
rate higher than 0.1%*anyhow*.
This argument has already been refuted many times. Let's assume that
you're right about the churn rate. The issue is enterprises not
http://bitcast-b.bitgravity.com/bitgravity/nanog_5Mbit_720p_30fps.mov
I believe this is it
--
kris
On May 11, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Tom Daly wrote:
Folks,
At NANOG 43, Jay Adelson had a video clip in his presentation which
celebrated the hilarity that customers create for network engineers.
On 5/11/11 11:39 AM, George Bonser wrote:
It depends. There are other things to take into account. If you
increase the time it takes a mobile device to complete a transaction by
only a couple of seconds, if you multiply those couple of seconds by
all of the users in a large metro area, you
So what's the alternative? Never change anything?
Of course not. But the best course forward is going to be different for
different folks. What might work best for me might not (probably WILL
not) work best for everyone else. One has to look at their situation
and plan the best path for their
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 5/11/11 8:26 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:16 AM, William Allen Simpson
william.allen.simp...@gmail.com wrote:
Courts like precedent. I choose Facebook's precedent. Seems reasonable to
me.
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Wed May 11 13:22:18
2011
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:21:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Japan electrical power?
From: Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com
To: Robert Boyle rob...@tellurian.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
On May 11, 2011 10:09 AM, Robert
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:39 AM, George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
There are other things to take into account. If you
increase the time it takes a mobile device to complete a transaction by
only a couple of seconds, if you multiply those couple of seconds by
all of the users in a
I agree that seconds sometimes matters, but the latency of a transaction
doesn't have a linear relationship with radio or battery usage on a
mobile device. Because of the timers involved in the state transitions
(eg CELL_FACH - CELL_DCH), a few seconds of extra latency often is
On 11 mei 2011, at 20:39, George Bonser wrote:
So what's the alternative? Never change anything?
Of course not. But the best course forward is going to be different for
different folks. What might work best for me might not (probably WILL
not) work best for everyone else. One has to look
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
No business is entitled to protection of its business model.
Unless it has a market monopoly, deep pockets, and lobbyist friends.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Michael Holstein
michael.holst...@csuohio.edu wrote:
I have the netflow records to prove this is NOT the case. All
MediaSentry (et.al.) do is scrape the tracker. We have also received a
number of takedown notices that have numbers transposed, involve parts
Tim Durack wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
No business is entitled to protection of its business model.
Unless it has a market monopoly, deep pockets, and lobbyist friends.
On 5/11/2011 11:03 AM, ja...@jamesstewartsmith.com wrote:
I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1 companies
that should have already been full deployed. These are also some of the more
expensive providers on a per Mb basis. The one provider that was full IPv6
At 21:43 11/05/2011 -0400, Vytautas Valancius wrote:
Hi NANOG,
From May 18th to June 18th Georgia Tech will conduct an Internet
routing study using AS-PATH poisoning. We will insert AS numbers into
one of our announcements to route around some networks.
The study will *only* affect the the
47 matches
Mail list logo
