On 8 jun 2011, at 7:42, Christopher Palmer wrote:
I'm not an ISP - but I absolutely expect that IPv6 roll-outs have long
time-horizons and are fairly complex. So I hope folks are looking at IPv6
NOW, and not simply waiting for Google/Bing/Yahoo/Interwebz to enable
permanent content access
Anyone tried:
http://www.zarafa.com/
??
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 8:51 PM
To: Syed Waqqas Ahmed; Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Hotmail?
Can you customize the
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 00:59, Iljitsch van Beijnum iljit...@muada.com wrote:
BTW, how are you guys dealing with path MTU discovery for IPv6? I've seen a
few sites that have problems with this, such as www.nist.gov,
Speaking of www.nist.gov, I am getting the front page to load, but all
links
On 06/07/11 22:00, Joly MacFie wrote:
ISOC Hong Kong has a great World IPv6 Day event - Kickstart IPv6! -
starting at 2pm HKT = 0600UTC (around an hour from now) and
running 3 and a half hours.
It will be webcast live via the ISOC Chapters Livestream Channel on the
ISOC-HK site -
* Jay Ashworth (j...@baylink.com) wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Matt Ryanczak ryanc...@gmail.com
Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6 enabled but the user-agent on my phone
denies me an IPv6 experience.
I thought I'd heard that LTE transport was *IPv6 only*...
LTE supports both IPv4
On 8 jun 2011, at 8:15, Andrew Koch wrote:
Speaking of www.nist.gov, I am getting the front page to load, but all
links are returning a 404 Not Found when browsing via v6
Right. They seem to have solved their PMTUD issues, though.
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
Owen,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
LSN is required when access providers come across the following two
combined constraints:
1. No more IPv4 addresses to give to customers.
2.
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message
AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE763A3AC06@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet
.us, John van Oppen writes:
I was wondering the same thing... we have v6 enabled to about 700 users i=
n our native Ethernet to the home deployment here in
On Jun 7, 2011, at 10:42 PM, Christopher Palmer wrote:
The title of this ongoing thread is giving me heart palpitations.
Content access over IPv6 may help justify ISPs investing in IPv6, but it in
no means is a prerequisite technically.
LSNs are fine when deployed in parallel with IPv6
Yes, livestream.com notably absent from the list of participating organizations.
I'm guessing they use their own custom set up, but is there any reason
flash media server wouldn't operate over v6 if the dns was there?
j
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Michael Sinatra
mich...@rancid.berkeley.edu
On 8 Jun 2011, at 02:13, TJ wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:04, Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljit...@muada.comwrote:
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:31, TJ wrote:
... and Gmail, too ...
imap.gmail.com only has IPv4, though.
Good catch, applies to pop smtp as well. Baby steps, I guess?
/TJ
Sadly,
On 8 Jun 2011, at 04:46, Jared Mauch wrote:
We have seen a traffic increase but nothing like what I was expecting, nay
hoping to see. (i.e.: gigs and gigs of traffic - it does look like ~2x to me
in an unscientific eye-look at a chart).
Some of it may be down to client behaviour.
On 8 Jun 2011, at 02:05, David Swafford wrote:
This is amusing:
In case the formatting get's lost, their initial address includes
face:booc and one of the hops along the way is dead:beef. :-)
Cisco's is better...
$ ping6 www.cisco.com
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:630:d0:f103::c0:ffee --
Let me just step in here and say.. it's tough to build onto Zimbra.
At work, we support ~1000 users on Zimbra (network edition), with
hundreds of thousands of messages flowing through daily, and it
doesn't like you tinkering with stuff under the hood. Most of your
customizations get blown
It is really nice that folks where able to put records on their
websites for only 24 hours, but they forgot to put in the glue on their
nameservers.
As such, for the folks testing IPv6-only, a lot of sites will fail
unless they use a recursor that does the IPv4 for them.
The root is there,
Hi !
To all contributors to this wonderful IPv6 day, juste a short notice :
please avoid SLAAC adresses on your public servers !
First, in case of an hardware crash, the recovery will be done under
presure and most will forget about forcing the new server's mac adress
to the old one, wich will
More here: http://ipv6.blizzard.com/
To test IPv6 in World of Warcraft, you'll need to edit your
config.wtf file and add the following line:
SET unlockIPv6 1
This will activate the IPv6 features. If your computer has
a valid IPv6 address, you'll
Interesting, I'm having that same issue w/ www.nist.gov this morning. Front
page loads fine, but all links return a 404. Here's my tracert if it
helps:
tracert www.nist.gov
Tracing route to nist.gov [2610:20:6060:aa::a66b]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
11 ms1 ms1 ms
I pulled out this one quote from Geoff Huston
http://isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=2210
entire archive is at
http://www.livestream.com/internetsocietychapters/folder?dirId=d43f898a-0e06-http://www.livestream.com/internetsocietychapters/folder?dirId=d43f898a-0e06-4f7b-a359-43b55a540aa1
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:28, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote:
It is really nice that folks where able to put records on their
websites for only 24 hours, but they forgot to put in the glue on their
nameservers.
agreed, but still better than juniper.net at the moment, glue seems to
Martin Hepworth max...@gmail.com wrote:
Have a look at the Hermes mail system at cam.Ac.uk, built buy among
people Philip Hazel of exam fame
Philip did not in fact have much to do with Hermes other than writing
Exim. (I think he might have had a hand in early versions of our user
That is one of the issues that I believe RIPE is capturing -- how many
dual-stacked sites have all their objects dual-stacked.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: David Hill [mailto:dh...@mindcry.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 12:10 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is
Ah...I saw the same thing at 6:01 Central. Lost DNS resolution of
ipv6.juniper.net, and couldn't get A or NS records of juniper.net. Had to
flush the cache on my DNS servers.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Verlouw [mailto:dan...@shunoshu.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 6:10
On Jun 8, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
On 8 Jun 2011, at 04:46, Jared Mauch wrote:
We have seen a traffic increase but nothing like what I was expecting, nay
hoping to see. (i.e.: gigs and gigs of traffic - it does look like ~2x to
me in an unscientific eye-look at a chart).
Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
stack at home (well, mostly, like most folks, VZ gives me a single
address and I live behind that with NATv4, but otherwise, I loves me
some FiOS) and yesterday went by for me without a hitch, including
accessing Facebook (I'd
As long % IPv6 content % IPv6 eyeballs, I think the eyeball counts will
naturally go up over time. As we're seeing today, content providers can add
IPv6 access to a greater percentage of their content in a few months than
what ISPs can do with a percentage of their customer base.
Frank
On 2011-Jun-08 13:40, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
stack at home (well, mostly, like most folks, VZ gives me a single
address and I live behind that with NATv4, but otherwise, I loves me
some FiOS) and yesterday went by for me without
I have the same setup as you, except a Linux box that does the firewalling.
The actiontec is pretty bad-ass, hardware-wise, and latest firmware versions
give you a bit more freedom.
Eth0 is the public addr and eth1 is the private addr. On Eth1 I've got a
address from the routed /48 and then
If Verizon would offer v6 on FiOS, I'd already be there. They don't, so
I've got a tunnel coming out of HE's Ashburn, VA POP. As far as me
losing a day (or is it gaining?), blah...too early in the morning. It
really is only Wednesday isn't it?
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen
The Actiontec is underpowered and if you put too many hosts behind it
will run out of memory for its NAT tables and your connectivity goes to
hell. My router is a D-Link not a Linksys. When I last upgraded my home
router, the D-Links were plainly v6 capable; the Linksys may or may not
have been,
TJ trej...@gmail.com wrote:
... and Gmail, too ...
Except they are not relaying mail over v6.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at http://dotat.at/
South Utsire: Variable 3 or 4, but in far southeast, easterly 5 at first and
becoming westerly 5 to 7 later. Slight or moderate. Rain then
In message b7872a58-de28-4cc2-8929-931fd3ce0...@delong.com, Owen DeLong write
s:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
=20
In message =
AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE763A3AC06@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet
.us, John van Oppen writes:
I was wondering the same thing... we
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
Owen,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
LSN is required when access providers come across the following two
combined constraints:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Cameron Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
Owen,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
LSN is required when
Cameron,
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Cameron Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Cameron Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
Owen,
On Tue, Jun
On Jun 8, 2011, at 4:52 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2011-Jun-08 13:40, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
stack at home (well, mostly, like most folks, VZ gives me a single
address and I live behind that with NATv4, but otherwise, I loves
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
Owen,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
LSN is required when access providers come
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message b7872a58-de28-4cc2-8929-931fd3ce0...@delong.com, Owen DeLong
write
s:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
=20
In message =
AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE763A3AC06@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet
.us, John van Oppen
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
Owen,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:48 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Cameron Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
Owen,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen
Just FWIW:
US, Amazon, Dlink, DIR615, $35.45 ...
/TJ
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 08:46, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message b7872a58-de28-4cc2-8929-931fd3ce0...@delong.com, Owen DeLong
write
s:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
=20
In message =
On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:09 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
In message e9d05f4b-081c-4f5d-9c6f-05f4ff8f0...@delong.com, Owen DeLong
writes:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
=20
In message b7872a58-de28-4cc2-8929-931fd3ce0...@delong.com, Owen =
DeLong write
s:
=20
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
=20
=3D20
-Original Message-
From: Tim Chown [mailto:t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:32 AM
I had to flush my MacOS X DNS cache before I'd get the
new record.
World IPv6 Day will be tomorrow.
Marcus Williams
I'm sure someone here is doing IPv6 peering with cogent. We've got a Gig
with them, So they don't do that dual peering thing with us. (They do it on
another 100Mb/s circuit we have... I despise it.)
Just kind of curious how they go about it.
Do they issue you a small IPv6 block for your
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Mark Andrews wrote:
The AUD prices include all taxes. That being said one can still buy
retail in the states including taxes, add shipping and come out in front
for a identical product. 3x markup is a rip-off.
Swedish prices are approximately equivalent of 110USD for
On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Williams, Marcus (Contractor) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Chown [mailto:t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:32 AM
I had to flush my MacOS X DNS cache before I'd get the
new record.
World IPv6 Day will be tomorrow.
The AUD prices include all taxes. That being said one can still
buy retail in the states including taxes, add shipping and come out
in front for a identical product. 3x markup is a rip-off.
No argument here, but, as I'm in the states...
The worst tax rate I know in the US is California
On 6/8/11 9:51 AM, Nick Olsen wrote:
I'm sure someone here is doing IPv6 peering with cogent. We've got a Gig
with them, So they don't do that dual peering thing with us. (They do it on
another 100Mb/s circuit we have... I despise it.)
Just kind of curious how they go about it.
Do they issue you
On 2011-Jun-08 16:09, Owen DeLong wrote:
[..]
World IPv6 day is today. It started at UTC June 8 and goes to
just before UTC June 9. As I write this, there are approximately
10 hours remaining in world IPv6 day.
I think it is quite obvious that nothing serious broke anywhere ;)
(read:
Nick,
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nick Olsen n...@flhsi.com wrote:
I'm sure someone here is doing IPv6 peering with cogent.
(snip)
Any things to be aware of before
pulling the trigger on it? (Other then them not having connectivity to HE's
IPv6 side of things, Wish they would fix that
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:51:21 -0400, Nick Olsen wrote:
I'm sure someone here is doing IPv6 peering with cogent. We've got a
Gig
with them, So they don't do that dual peering thing with us. (They do
it
on
another 100Mb/s circuit we have... I despise it.)
Just kind of curious how they go about
Do they issue you a small IPv6 block for your interface, just like they
do
for IPv4? Is it a separate session? Any things to be aware of before
pulling the trigger on it? (Other then them not having connectivity to
Hi Nick,
They issued a /112 for our interface with a separate BGP
It certainly sounds like it might be.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St
On 6/8/2011 12:42 AM, Christopher Palmer wrote:
I'm not an ISP - but I absolutely expect that IPv6 roll-outs have
long time-horizons and are fairly complex. So I hope folks are
looking at IPv6 NOW, and not simply waiting for
Google/Bing/Yahoo/Interwebz to enable permanent content access and
Please pardon my sarcasm. My point was these records may linger in dns
cache tomorrow, even if the corresponding IPv6 web site is turned off UTC
June 9, and the records are removed.
Marcus Williams
-Original Message-
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
Sent:
I was thinking the same thing. Good call :)
Ryan Pavely
Net Access Corporation
http://www.nac.net/
On 6/8/2011 10:40 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
It certainly sounds like it might be.
Cheers,
-- jra
I have a similar setting as Jamie, VZ Fios plus HE tunnel, except I am
running a FreeBSD VM to terminate tunnel and to run rtadvd. everything
works nicely, so I thought I could do some tests on IPv6 connectivity
and speed to China. There is a single-stack IPv6 website
(bt.neu6.edu.cn) hosted by a
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:33 AM, David Swafford da...@davidswafford.com wrote:
Interesting, I'm having that same issue w/ www.nist.gov this morning. Front
page loads fine, but all links return a 404. Here's my tracert if it
helps:
tracert www.nist.gov
Tracing route to nist.gov
On 8 Jun 2011, at 07:15, Andrew Koch wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 00:59, Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljit...@muada.com wrote:
BTW, how are you guys dealing with path MTU discovery for IPv6?
I've seen a few sites that have problems with this, such as www.nist.gov
,
Speaking of www.nist.gov,
Typical long trip via a sixxs.net tunnel.
Unlike Hurricane Electric (tunnelbroker.net), Sixxs has no US peering that I
know of so everything has to hit overseas before returning back.
Curtis.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Neil Long wrote:
Top of the page it says (now, may have been added)
Note: This top level web page has been setup to test IPv6 capabilities and
to participate in World IPv6 Day on June 8, 2011. This IPv6 web page will be
disabled after the end of World IPv6 Day. Links on
Interesting ... I seem to stay in North America ... I guess it depends what
POP you connect to?
traceroute6 to nist.gov (2610:20:6060:aa::a66b) from
2001:4978:snip:fe67:cafa, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 2001:snip::1 1.147 ms 0.461 ms 0.413 ms
2 gw-525.chi-02.us.sixxs.net 30.235 ms
Good catch -- I traveled the world and back today on v6! Overall though the
day seems to be going well, I've sparked a lot of enthusiasm at work by
bragging this event (I even made a shirt to promote it :-), and I'd love to see
this become a regular occurrence.
David.
- Original Message
+1
I've enjoyed it so far!
On 08/06/2011 16:07, Ryan Pavely wrote:
I was thinking the same thing. Good call :)
Ryan Pavely
Net Access Corporation
http://www.nac.net/
On 6/8/2011 10:40 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
It certainly sounds like it might be.
Cheers,
-- jra
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Rob V r...@ipninja.net wrote:
Interesting ... I seem to stay in North America ... I guess it depends what
POP you connect to?
traceroute6 to nist.gov (2610:20:6060:aa::a66b) from
2001:4978:snip:fe67:cafa, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 2001:snip::1 1.147
On 8 Jun 2011, at 16:30, Jay Ford wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Neil Long wrote:
Top of the page it says (now, may have been added)
Note: This top level web page has been setup to test IPv6
capabilities and to participate in World IPv6 Day on June 8, 2011.
This IPv6 web page will be disabled
Hi.
The main objective for today is to access the web services, that's why you
can't reach a record for a DNS query for a given NS server.
; DiG 9.5.1-P3 www.google.com
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 40029
;; flags: qr rd
I noticed that one of our vendors wasn't actually participating when
they very publicly put on their home page that they would. So I
queried the IPv6 day participation list to see who didn't have 's
for their listed website. It turned out to be around 9.5%
Before you read the list, here's me
The main objective for today is to access the web services, that's why you
can't reach a record for a DNS query for a given NS server.
So if there are no records from where we ftp6 the HOSTSV6.TXT file ?
-J
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Daniel Espejel wrote:
Hi.
The main objective for today is to access the web services, that's why you
can't reach a record for a DNS query for a given NS server.
exactly - this site provides a nice service snapshot:
http://www.mrp.net/IPv6Day.html
; DiG 9.5.1-P3
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:47:43 PDT, Owen DeLong said:
For all but the most inept of access providers, they will have some ability
to put customers on IPv6 prior to the day they would have to deploy LSN.
The cynic in me says that guarantees widespread deployment of LSN. :)
pgpfiixYhziVp.pgp
http://www.mrp.net/IPv6Day.html
The web access column reflects access to internal content or just the
home page ?
-J
Sounds good to me.
---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of Learn RouterOS
ISOC has a red/green dashboard of individual (non)participants:
http://www.worldipv6day.org/participant-websites/index.html
Cheers,
~Chris
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 09:59, James Harr james.h...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that one of our vendors wasn't actually participating when
they very
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jorge Amodio wrote:
http://www.mrp.net/IPv6Day.html
The web access column reflects access to internal content or just the
home page ?
Mark's notes explain what he tested and clicking on any link shows
the result of his diagnostics:
On 2011-Jun-08 17:26, STARNES, CURTIS wrote:
Typical long trip via a sixxs.net tunnel. Unlike Hurricane Electric
(tunnelbroker.net), Sixxs has no US peering that I know of so
everything has to hit overseas before returning back.
psst.. there is no such thing as SixXS peering.
Each PoP
The list of TownNews domains participating can be found here:
http://www.townnews365.com/ipv6/
-mjf
-Original Message-
From: James Harr [mailto:james.h...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 12:00 PM
To: nanog
Subject: IPv6 day non-participants
I noticed that one of our vendors
The list of TownNews domains participating can be found here:
http://www.townnews365.com/ipv6/
ahwatukee.com
alpineavalanche.com
anchoragepress.com
aransaspassprogress.com
argus-press.com
auburnpub.com
azdailysun.com
banderabulletin.com
beatricedailysun.com
belgrade-news.com
Was participating until we hit a rather nasty load balancer bug that
took out the entire unit if clients with a short MTU connected and it
needed to fragment packets (Citrix Netscaler running latest code). No
fix is available for it yet, so we had to shut it down. Ran for about
9 hours before
http://www.mrp.net/IPv6Day.html
The web access column reflects access to internal content or just the
home page ?
Mark's notes explain what he tested and clicking on any link shows
the result of his diagnostics:
http://www.mrp.net//IPv6Day_files/diagnostics/aol.com.html
guessing he
Just grabbed the Trial and tested it.
Verified that IPv6 is used for World of Warcraft on the Antonidas
server. It works pretty well actually.
I see they replicated their practice of dropping all ICMP traffic for
IPv6. Not sure that's the best idea.
Anyone know if they plan to leave it
On 6/8/11 1:29 AM, Neil Long wrote:
On 8 Jun 2011, at 02:13, TJ wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:04, Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljit...@muada.comwrote:
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:31, TJ wrote:
... and Gmail, too ...
imap.gmail.com only has IPv4, though.
Good catch, applies to pop smtp as
You shouldn't. The matter of the fact is that for al leats 24 hours users
like you and me ... all we can reach the main Webpages for each participant
in the ipv6 day.
The idea is that this must be all in a transparent manner for the final
users. If you have an IPv6 supported
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 08:25:59PM +, john.herb...@usc-bt.com wrote:
Bill Woodcock [mailto:wo...@pch.net] spake:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2533454/
Uh...
This does rather assume that users can access Google/Bing (both IPv6
day participants) to search for a solution to the problems
I notice that that page currently lists as http://www.bbc.co.uk/ as
unreachable via IPv4 ! ?
j
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Chris Grundemann cgrundem...@gmail.comwrote:
ISOC has a red/green dashboard of individual (non)participants:
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Amodio [mailto:jmamo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 1:01 PM
To: Lucy Lynch
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: on various websites, but they all forgot to enable
them on their nameservers
http://www.mrp.net/IPv6Day.html
The web
I've done the same at home, HE tunnel for IPv6. I've got a Linksys
WRT54GL running DD-WRT so getting it set up was relatively straight
forward though I really need to fix the automatic startup script that's
misbehaving.
Work was another matter, one big headache, to the point where I'm
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:22 58PM, john.herb...@usc-bt.com
john.herb...@usc-bt.com wrote:
No issues connecting to FB for me on IPv6 (both to www.v6.facebook.com and to
the returned by www.facebook.com now).
Interesting (perhaps) side note - www.facebook.com has a , but
facebook.com
...yes, there is a serious lack of v6 enabled eyeballs. But it's also
not clear to me from Akamai's stats just how many of the sites they host
are v6 enabled. 2? 12? 500?
True. I'll go back to their site and dig for more detailed info about
what those hits are actually hitting.
Regards
Jorge
The ISOC dashboard that Chris mentions is indeed accurate and up to date
from our perspective. Comcast is definitely an active participant with
our website http://xfinity.comcast.net, which is live with a published
and is IPv6 reachable.
Thanks
--
Chris Griffiths
Comcast Cable
Are you really on Cook Island in the Pacific or is your email headers
date timezone string set incorrectly -1000. Your message won't be read
by me until tonight shortly after 12:19 am. Sadly you'll miss IPv6 day :(
Ryan Pavely
Net Access Corporation
http://www.nac.net/
On
Just noted that cogent does not have a IPv6 route to any subnet in HE,
and HE does not have any routes to Cogent!
Looks like we have different Global IPv6 tables? Or does Cogent just
NOT peer IPv6 peer with anyone else!
Dennis
On 6/8/2011 12:43, Dennis Burgess wrote:
Just noted that cogent does not have a IPv6 route to any subnet in HE,
and HE does not have any routes to Cogent!
Looks like we have different Global IPv6 tables? Or does Cogent just
NOT peer IPv6 peer with anyone else!
Cogent and HE don't
Has been going on for a long while now. HE even made a cake for Cogent (IIRC),
to no avail.
But, this is not surprising. A lot of public/major peering issues with v4 over
the past few years has been cogent vs. someone else.
Brielle
--Original Message--
From: Dennis Burgess
To:
What seems evident, looking at
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/06/monitoring-world-ipv6-day/ is that a
lot of folks switched it on - and then switched it off again pretty damn
quick!
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Jeroen Massar wrote:
:: It is really nice that folks where able to put records on their
:: websites for only 24 hours, but they forgot to put in the glue on their
:: nameservers.
::
:: As such, for the folks testing IPv6-only, a lot of sites will fail
:: unless they use
Correct, The only way around this currently is to peer with both cogent and
HE.
If you have cogent, You can 6to4 w/BGP with HE. I would consider that just
a patch for the problem. I would do it just for the reachablility.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:43:23 -0500, Dennis Burgess
dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote:
Just noted that cogent does not have a IPv6 route to any subnet in HE,
and HE does not have any routes to Cogent!
Looks like we have different Global IPv6 tables? Or does Cogent just
NOT peer IPv6 peer with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/8/11 3:48 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
Has been going on for a long while now. HE even made a cake for Cogent
(IIRC), to no avail.
But, this is not surprising. A lot of public/major peering issues with v4
over the past few years has been
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
