Op 12 jun 2011, om 03:50 heeft Randy Carpenter het volgende geschreven:
I have an interesting situation at a business that I am working on. We
currently have the office set up with redundant connections for their mission
critical servers and such, and also have a (cheap) cable modem for
On 12/06/2011 1:42 a.m., Lynda wrote:
Mostly, I've just ignored this,
As do I with most treads on this list. However I found the link in the
OP's post offensive on so many different levels that I choose to put
some comment in with a great deal of subtly and hopefully a little humour.
On 12/06/2011 1:02 p.m., Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 11, 2011, at 15:16, Jeroen van Aartjer...@mompl.net wrote:
Randy Bush wrote:
some of us try to get work done from home. and anyone who has worked
and/or lived in a first world country thinks american 'broadband' speeds
are a joke, even for
100mbit is not luxury, it's something my business needs all it's
customers to have to drive more uptake of my services.
My customers already have 10/1 today. Now I need them to have 100/40 so
they have a reason to buy other CPE that in turn drives my business.
See:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:41:17PM -0400, Kevin Loch wrote:
VRRPv3 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5798) is still a bit broken
in that it makes mention of MUST advertise RA's
That's unintentional as per recent discussion on IETF VRRP mailing list
where I seeked for clarification as JUNOS
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:12:26PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
You must have RA to at least tell you:
Default Router
Go ask the DHCP server (M and/or O bit)
As it currently stands, an RFC-compliant host will not attempt to solicit
a DHCP response unless it receives an RA with the
On 11 jun 2011, at 16:39, David Conrad wrote:
There is no point in repeating all the IPv4 mistakes with IPv6, if that's
what you want, stay on IPv4.
As should be apparent by now, the vast majority of people don't want to move
to IPv6. They simply want access to the Internet. ISPs are
On 11 jun 2011, at 17:05, Owen DeLong wrote:
Your doctor doesn't just give you the medicine you ask for either.
You are not talking about a doctor/patient scenario here where the doctor is
an expert and the people asking for this have no
medical training. Here, we are talking about
On 12 jun 2011, at 12:35, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Could you point to any RFC which implies or explicitly states that
DHCPv6 MUST NOT be used in absence of RA with M and/or O=1?
But what's the alternative? Always run DHCPv6 even if there are no router
advertisements or router advertisements with
2011/6/11 Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org
The router isn't assigning an address, it's merely telling everyone on the
segment what the local prefix and default route is. As such, there's no
reason why the router should try to register a DNS entry.
On the other hand, the host could (and
On 12 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Fabio Mendes wrote:
2011/6/11 Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org
The router isn't assigning an address, it's merely telling everyone on the
segment what the local prefix and default route is. As such, there's no
reason why the router should try to register a
In a message written on Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Iljitsch van
Beijnum wrote:
But what's the alternative? Always run DHCPv6 even if there are no router
advertisements or router advertisements with O=0, M=0?
Yes.
Like I said before, that would pollute the network with many
dynamic dns update has been done by hosts for some time...
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2136.txt
On Jun 12, 2011, at 5:38 AM, Fabio Mendes wrote:
2011/6/11 Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org
The router isn't assigning an address, it's merely telling everyone on the
segment what the local
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:30:26PM -0300, Fabio Mendes wrote:
The router isn't assigning an address, it's merely telling everyone on the
segment what the local prefix and default route is. As such, there's no
reason
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 12 jun 2011, at 12:35, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Could you point to any RFC which implies or explicitly states that
DHCPv6 MUST NOT be used in absence of RA with M and/or O=1?
But what's the alternative? Always run
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 09:38:32AM -0300, Fabio Mendes wrote:
2011/6/11 Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org
The router isn't assigning an address, it's merely telling everyone on the
segment what the local prefix and default route is. As such, there's no
reason why the router should try to
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 08:59:50AM -0500, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
The router isn't assigning an address, it's merely telling everyone on the
segment what the local prefix and default route is. As such, there's no
reason
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:22:59PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/159964/20110609/nasa-solar-flare-tsunami-earth-sun-radio-satellite-interference-aurora-displays-coronal-mass-ejectio.htm
On 6/12/11 1:04 PM, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote:
On Jun 11, 2011, at 7:07 PM, Roy wrote:
On 6/11/2011 4:29 PM, Christopher Pilkington wrote:
Options seem to be limited to HughesNet and dial for the moment, but
things may change if I put a tower on the property. HughesNet seems to
relax
You might want to consider 655 or 825 from Dlink and the Apple Airport
Extreme and Time Capsule. We have had a pretty
good experience with these models thus far.
John
=
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Cable
e) mailto:john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com
o)
You might contact SkyBeam out of Denver. They have been buying up most of
the independent WISPs in my area. They seem to be expanding at a rapid rate.
They currently rent my tower for one of their nodes.
You might also look for a WISP mailing list to post the question on. I do
not know what the
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:04:46AM -0600, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote:
On Jun 11, 2011, at 7:07 PM, Roy wrote:
On 6/11/2011 4:29 PM, Christopher Pilkington wrote:
Options seem to be limited to HughesNet and dial for the moment, but
things may change if I put a tower on the property.
On 6/12/2011 11:44 AM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I don't believe we were talking about DHCPv6, we were talking about SLAAC.
And I *still* think it's a better idea for the client to be registering
itself in DNS; the host knows what domain(s) it should be part of, and hence
which names refer to
Good point. That is exactly how I got into the business. I had to have a T1
line run to the house to get enough bandwidth. At 425.33 a month, I decided
to have some of my students setup a WISP at my place so the neighbors would
pay for the data line instead of me. For equipment and software look
On June 11, 2011 at 20:53 jle...@lewis.org (Jon Lewis) wrote:
Have you heard the joke...ISDN = I Still Don't kNow? For whatever reason,
BRI service is something the US telcos apparently never really wanted to
sell...perhaps because it might have cut into their T1 business.
FWIW,
On 12 jun 2011, at 15:45, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Like I said before, that would pollute the network with many multicasts
which can seriously degrade wifi performance.
Huh? This is no worse than IPv4 where a host comes up and sends a
subnet-broadcast to get DHCP.
The IPv4 host does this once
Sure its old and slow, but it is or at least was readily available to use
poor country folk that cannot get DSL and so forth. The failback positions
when all else is unavailable is analog, ISDN, or T1 from a landline,
satellite or a WISP through the air with cellular data becoming more of an
When I had mine years ago I was lucky that ISDN in FL was unmetered which was
no the case in other locales. However it took forever to get it installed and
working correctly. Bell South had to change out pairs and get a tech from 200
miles away to get it installed right. Today, the central
Prefix translation looks to be exactly what we need to do here. Thanks for all
of the replies.
-Randy
On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:42, Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote:
Op 12 jun 2011, om 03:50 heeft Randy Carpenter het volgende geschreven:
I have an interesting situation at a business that I
Hi
Our company will prepare ipv6. I have the following questions
We will apply ipv6 from ARIN and try to use it in hosting business
1/ Can we use it in our current AS which is using ipv4? If not. Do we
have to apply new AS?
2/ Can arin not allow us to apply ipv4 for the future after we apply
On 6/10/2011 7:04 AM, Scott Brim wrote:
The
Internet is now more important than electricity or water --
This being a silly Sunday, I'm rolling that around on my tongue and savoring it
a bit.
While the image of a desiccated user, still typing away, is appealing -- but
possibly not all
Once upon a time, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com said:
The attraction of DSL was, among other things, that it was nailed down
to one and only one service provider, you couldn't just dial some
other provider like with ISDN.
When BellSouth switched their DSL from PVC-per-customer to PPPoE, it
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 01:16, Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote:
Randy Bush wrote:
some of us try to get work done from home. and anyone who has worked
and/or lived in a first world country thinks american 'broadband' speeds
are a joke, even for a home network.
I understand, but I
Once upon a time, Eugeniu Patrascu eu...@imacandi.net said:
I need 100Mbs at home because I want to see a streamed movie NOW, not
in a month because someone considers broadband a luxury :)
Pretty simple usage scenario I might say.
The top profile for Blu-Ray is 36 megabits per second, and that
When BellSouth switched their DSL from PVC-per-customer to PPPoE
I remember having to compress the config due to static pvc config on many of
7204/6 kit, the switch made it much more intuitive to manage.
--
m
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a
On 6/12/2011 4:01 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
IPv6 address configuration is a house of cards. Touch it and it all comes
crashing down. DHCPv6 has a number of significant flaws, and the interaction
between DHCPv6 and router advertisements only barely makes sense.
Well, at least you're
- Original Message -
From: Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
The top profile for Blu-Ray is 36 megabits per second, and that is
not used on most titles. Over-the-air HDTV is 19 megabits or less.
Cable HD channels are often only 12-15 megabits per second.
Chris glances off, but doesn't
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 14:46 -0400, Deric Kwok wrote:
We will apply ipv6 from ARIN and try to use it in hosting business
1/ Can we use it in our current AS which is using ipv4? If not. Do we
have to apply new AS?
No, you can route IPv6 IPv4 from the same ASN.
2/ Can arin not allow us to
On 12 jun 2011, at 20:46, Deric Kwok wrote:
1/ Can we use it in our current AS which is using ipv4?
Yes.
2/ Can arin not allow us to apply ipv4 for the future after we apply ipv6?
They're going to do that anyway once they run out, but it's not like you have
v6 so you don't need more v4.
Once upon a time, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com said:
- Original Message -
From: Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
The top profile for Blu-Ray is 36 megabits per second, and that is
not used on most titles. Over-the-air HDTV is 19 megabits or less.
Cable HD channels are often only
dcroc...@bbiw.net wrote:
While the image of a desiccated user, still typing away, is appealing --
but possibly not all that remarkable, given recent reports of Internet
addiction -- what's especially tasty is the idea of having an Internet
connection that works without electricity...
About
Op 12 jun 2011, om 12:05 heeft Daniel Roesen het volgende geschreven:
VRRP communications itself is via link-local addresses. There is a
requirement to have a link-local virtual address as well, but there
might be many more, e.g. global scope.
In FreeBSD with pfSense I use CARP with a v6
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 01:44 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
And I *still* think it's a better idea for the client to be
registering itself in DNS; the host knows what domain(s) it should be
part of, and hence which names refer to itself and should be updated
with it's new address.
Having tried
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 08:12:02PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 12 jun 2011, at 15:45, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Like I said before, that would pollute the network with many multicasts
which can seriously degrade wifi performance.
Huh? This is no worse than IPv4 where a host comes
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 01:46:20PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
On 6/12/2011 11:44 AM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I don't believe we were talking about DHCPv6, we were talking about SLAAC.
And I *still* think it's a better idea for the client to be registering
itself in DNS; the host knows what
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 09:56:59AM +1000, Karl Auer wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 01:44 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
And I *still* think it's a better idea for the client to be
registering itself in DNS; the host knows what domain(s) it should be
part of, and hence which names refer to
In a message written on Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 08:12:02PM +0200, Iljitsch van
Beijnum wrote:
The IPv4 host does this once and gets its lease. If there is no DHCPv6 server
then DHCPv6 clients would keep broadcasting forever. Not a good thing.
DHCP today uses an exponential backoff if there is no
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
DHCP today uses an exponential backoff if there is no response, I don't
see why that can't be kept in IPv6. Plus I wonder how long users would
keep on machines that get no useable network connectivity.
I really think the
So I found out I had an actual end-user issue related to IPv6 test day.
My mother couldn't get to our webmail with her BN Nook Color (based on
Android 2.3). I went over and couldn't connect with my T-Mobile G2
(Android 2.2) either. Their connection is via DSL and does not have
IPv6 configured,
Howdy,
Would someone with network clue at Charter hit me up offlist? Need some
assistance and I can't get past your wonderful support personnel.
Thanks!
Mike
50 matches
Mail list logo
